IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01961030.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Les challenges des stratégies d'innovation régionales ou l'émergence de nouveaux espaces pour les structures de l'accompagnement « traditionnelles »

Author

Listed:
  • Jérémie Faham

    (ESTIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY)

  • Éric Barquissau

    (ESTIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY)

  • Iban Lizarralde

    (ESTIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY)

  • Jérémy Legardeur

    (IMS - Laboratoire de l'intégration, du matériau au système - UB - Université Sciences et Technologies - Bordeaux 1 - Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, ESTIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY)

Abstract

Au travers du cas particulier de l'ESTIA, cette communication illustre l'exemple du positionnement d'un « Business Innovation Center » et d'une équipe de recherche dédiés à l'accompagnement à l'entrepreneuriat innovant dans les « zones intermédiaires » d'un système d'innovation régional de la Nouvelle-Aquitaine (NA) en pleine restructuration depuis l'avènement des Stratégies de Recherche et d'Innovation pour la Spécialisation Intelligente (RIS3) en 2014 et la récente réforme des régions françaises qui s'est opérée entre 2015 et 2016. Via la présentation d'un prototype de plateforme collaborative et d'une méthodologie de matching entre « Entrepreneurs Régionaux » (RE) qui sont proposés pour aider la puissance publique régionale à instrumenter les processus complexes de la RIS3 à l'échelle de la NA, cette communication tente de mettre en lumière les opportunités d'actions et de positionnements inédits que ces mutations structurelles récentes ouvrent aujourd'hui aux structures « traditionnelles » de l'accompagnement issues de la sphère publique. Car la connaissance (et la reconnaissance!) dont jouissent ce type de structures « historiques » de l'accompagnement au sein de leurs écosystèmes territoriaux respectifs (tant au niveau des institutions publiques régionales, que du tissu des entreprises individuelles régionales qu'elles accompagnent) leur confère désormais un statut privilégié pour jouer le rôle des nouveaux « acteurs intermédiaires » qui devront à la fois soutenir l'action des pouvoirs publics dans le dessein des macro-dynamiques du développement stratégique des régions tout en continuant à agir quotidiennement auprès des « entrepreneurs » au niveau microéconomique du territoire (un niveau où la puissance publique n'est plus si légitime que cela pour intervenir directement) 4e Rencontre entre acteurs des réseaux d'accompagnement et chercheurs

Suggested Citation

  • Jérémie Faham & Éric Barquissau & Iban Lizarralde & Jérémy Legardeur, 2018. "Les challenges des stratégies d'innovation régionales ou l'émergence de nouveaux espaces pour les structures de l'accompagnement « traditionnelles »," Post-Print hal-01961030, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01961030
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01961030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01961030/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberta Capello & Henning Kroll, 2016. "From theory to practice in smart specialization strategy: emerging limits and possible future trajectories," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(8), pages 1393-1406, August.
    2. A. Fayolle, 2007. "Entrepreneurship and New Value Creation - The dynamic of the Entrepreneurship Process Cambridge," Post-Print halshs-00275655, HAL.
    3. Roberto Camagni & Roberta Capello, 2013. "Regional Competitiveness and Territorial Capital: A Conceptual Approach and Empirical Evidence from the European Union," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(9), pages 1383-1402, October.
    4. Alain Fayolle, 2007. "Entrepreneurship and new value creation : The dynamic of the entrepreneurial process," Post-Print hal-02298095, HAL.
    5. Alain Fayolle, 2007. "Entrepreneurship and new value creation," Post-Print hal-01892768, HAL.
    6. Philippe Silberzahn, 2014. "Effectuation : les principes de l'entrepreneuriat pour tous," Post-Print hal-02298196, HAL.
    7. Kroll, Henning & Muller, Emmanuel & Schnabl, Esther & Zenker, Andrea, 2014. "From smart concept to challenging practice: How European regions deal with the Commission's request for novel innovation strategies," Working Papers "Firms and Region" R2/2014, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    8. Bengt-ake Lundvall & Bjorn Johnson, 1994. "The Learning Economy," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 23-42.
    9. A. Fayolle, 2007. "Entrepreneurship and New Value Creation – The Dynamic of the Entrepreneurial ProcessCambridge," Post-Print halshs-00312163, HAL.
    10. Jérémie Faham & Maxime Daniel & Benjamin Tyl & Iban Lizarralde & Iñaki Garagorri & Jérémy Legardeur, 2016. "A Dialogical Approach to increase " Matching " Efficiency before Collaborative Business Model Processes," Post-Print hal-01332579, HAL.
    11. Annabelle Jaouen & Frank Lasch, 2015. "A new typology of micro-firm owner-managers," Post-Print hal-02011095, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jérémie Faham & Maxime Daniel & Jérémy Legardeur, 2016. "Toward a Matching Approach to Support CBM (Collaborative Business Model) Processes between Regional Entrepreneurs within the RIS3 Policy," Post-Print hal-01332621, HAL.
    2. Jérémie Faham & Maxime Daniel & Jérémy Legardeur, 2016. "Toward a Matching Approach to Support CBM (Collaborative Business Model) Processes between Regional Entrepreneurs within the RIS3 Policy," Working Papers hal-01332621, HAL.
    3. Hsu, Dan K. & Burmeister-Lamp, Katrin & Simmons, Sharon A. & Foo, Maw-Der & Hong, Michelle C. & Pipes, Jesse D., 2019. "“I know I can, but I don't fit”: Perceived fit, self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 311-326.
    4. Muhamad Ahsan & Armanu Thoyib & Achmad Sudiro & Nur Khusniyah Indrawati, 2016. "Developing Entrepreneurial Spirit Based on Local Wisdom," International Journal of Social Science Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(2), pages 44-65, September.
    5. Yousef Hedjazi, 2015. "A Study on the Deterring Factors to Entrepreneurship among Graduates of Agriculture and Natural Resources: Case Study in Bushehr, Iran," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(5), pages 126-133.
    6. Erik Stam, 2018. "Measuring Entrepreneurial Ecosystems," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: Allan O'Connor & Erik Stam & Fiona Sussan & David B. Audretsch (ed.), Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, pages 173-197, Springer.
    7. F.C. Stam & Andrew van de Ven, 2018. "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: A Systems Perspective," Working Papers 18-06, Utrecht School of Economics.
    8. Wei-Loon Koe, 2016. "The relationship between Individual Entrepreneurial Orientation (IEO) and entrepreneurial intention," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Jérémie Faham & Maxime Daniel & Benjamin Tyl & Iban Lizarralde & Iñaki Garagorri & Jérémy Legardeur, 2016. "A Dialogical Approach to increase " Matching " Efficiency before Collaborative Business Model Processes," Post-Print hal-01332579, HAL.
    10. Jones, Geoffrey & Pitelis, Christos, 2015. "Entrepreneurial Imagination and a Demand and Supply-side Perspective on the MNE and Cross-border Organization," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 309-321.
    11. Danijela Stošić Panić, 2019. "The Strategic Choices Of Serbian Entrepreneurs: Are They Entrepreneurially Oriented And Do They Differ By Gender?," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 64(222), pages 147-172, July – Se.
    12. Soetanto, Danny & Jack, Sarah, 2016. "The impact of university-based incubation support on the innovation strategy of academic spin-offs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 50, pages 25-40.
    13. Bernd Wurth & Erik Stam & Ben Spigel, 2022. "Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 729-778, May.
    14. Maribel Guerrero & David Urbano & Alain Fayolle & Magnus Klofsten & Sarfraz Mian, 2016. "Entrepreneurial universities: emerging models in the new social and economic landscape," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 551-563, October.
    15. Omer Ali Ibrahim & Sonal Devesh & Vaheed Ubaidullah, 2017. "Implication of attitude of graduate students in Oman towards entrepreneurship: an empirical study," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Gabay-Mariani, Laetitia & Paillé, Pascal & Valéau, Patrick, 2023. "The long-term persistence among nascent entrepreneurs: An fsQCA analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    17. Aleksey I. Shinkevich & Alsu A. Lubnina & Alexey G. Koryakov & Vladimir G. Mikhailov & Ekaterina L. Vodolazhskaya, 2016. "Economic Aspects of Risk Management of Stakeholders Activities," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(2), pages 328-332.
    18. Justice Malebana, 2014. "Entrepreneurial intentions of South African rural university students: A test of the theory of planned behaviour," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 6(2), pages 130-143.
    19. Tasawur Hussain & Muhammad Zia-Ur-Rehman & Shah Abbas, 2021. "Role of entrepreneurial knowledge and personal attitude in developing entrepreneurial intentions in business graduates: a case of Pakistan," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 11(1), pages 439-449, December.
    20. Lucio Cassia & Tommaso Minola & Stefano Paleari, 2011. "Entrepreneurship, technology and change: a review and proposal for an interpretative framework," Working Papers 1103, Department of Management, Information and Production Engineering, University of Bergamo.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01961030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.