IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01564476.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Practices in the design of open source products by online communities

Author

Listed:
  • Jérémy Bonvoisin

    (Fraunhofer IPK - Fraunhofer Institute for Production Systems and Design Technology - Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft - Fraunhofer)

  • Robert Mies

    (Fraunhofer IPK - Fraunhofer Institute for Production Systems and Design Technology - Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft - Fraunhofer)

  • Laetitia Thomas

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019])

  • Karine Samuel

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019])

  • Céline Gros

    (G-SCOP_CC - Conception collaborative - G-SCOP - Laboratoire des sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019])

  • Jean-François Boujut

    (G-SCOP_CC - Conception collaborative - G-SCOP - Laboratoire des sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019])

  • Rainer Stark

    (Fraunhofer IPK - Fraunhofer Institute for Production Systems and Design Technology - Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft - Fraunhofer)

  • Roland Jochem

    (Fraunhofer IPK - Fraunhofer Institute for Production Systems and Design Technology - Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft - Fraunhofer)

Abstract

Le phénomène du logiciel Open Source est déjà bien décrit dans la littérature, mais son évolution vers d'autres domaines tels que le développement de produits matériels tangibles reste essentiellement théorique. La littérature existante a identifié que, pour favoriser la mise en œuvre du développement de produits open source (OSPD), un soutien supplémentaire aux processus est nécessaire pour soutenir les défis organisationnels de ces projets dans la réalisation de produits complexes de haute qualité. Les fonctionnalités de ce support de processus n'ont pas encore été caractérisées. L'objectif de cet article est de combler cette lacune en explorant les pratiques émergeant des communautés OSPD pour observer les usages actuels afin de collaborer progressivement dans le futur. À cette fin, le cadre de Fjeldsted a été activé lors d'une étude empirique qualitative et comparative réalisée avec 28 participants de projets OSPD à travers des entretiens semi-dirigés. Les résultats préliminaires indiquent 3 besoins principaux de ces communautés dans l'utilisation potentielle de la plate-forme qui devrait servir à caractériser les projets OSPD. Ils révèlent également l'importance de l'attitude des fondateurs originaux, à savoir la capacité d'ouverture et d'apprentissage mutuel, la motivation pour le «hédonisme», l'entrepreneuriat social.

Suggested Citation

  • Jérémy Bonvoisin & Robert Mies & Laetitia Thomas & Karine Samuel & Céline Gros & Jean-François Boujut & Rainer Stark & Roland Jochem, 2017. "Practices in the design of open source products by online communities," Post-Print hal-01564476, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01564476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dahlander, Linus & Gann, David M., 2010. "How open is innovation?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 699-709, July.
    2. Marcel Bogers & Ann-Kristin Zobel & Allan Afuah & Esteve Almirall & Sabine Brunswicker & Linus Dahlander & Lars Frederiksen & Annabelle Gawer & Marc Gruber & Stefan Haefliger & John Hagedoorn & Dennis, 2017. "The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 8-40, January.
    3. Alexander Osterwalder & Yves Pigneur, 2002. "An e-Business Model Ontology for Modeling e-Business," Industrial Organization 0202004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Mollick, Ethan, 2014. "The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16.
    5. von Krogh, Georg & von Hippel, Eric, 2003. "Special issue on open source software development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1149-1157, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jérémy Bonvoisin & Laetitia Thomas & Robert Mies & Rainer Stark & Karine Samuel & Roland Jochem & Jean-François Boujut & Céline Gros, 2017. "Current state of practices in open source product development," Post-Print hal-01578044, HAL.
    2. Dahlander, Linus & Gann, David M. & Wallin, Martin W., 2021. "How open is innovation? A retrospective and ideas forward," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(4).
    3. Bertschek, Irene & Kesler, Reinhold, 2022. "Let the user speak: Is feedback on Facebook a source of firms’ innovation?," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    4. Radziwon, Agnieszka & Bogers, Marcel, 2019. "Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 573-587.
    5. Anna Maria Lis & Marita McPhillips & Adrian Lis, 2020. "Sustainability of Cluster Organizations as Open Innovation Intermediaries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Cenamor, Javier, 2021. "Complementor competitive advantage: A framework for strategic decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 335-343.
    7. Bjorn Remneland Wikhamn & Alexander Styhre, 2019. "Open Innovation Groundwork," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 1-29, January.
    8. Jakob Pohlisch, 2020. "Internal Open Innovation—Lessons Learned from Internal Crowdsourcing at SAP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    9. Colin C. J. Cheng & Eric C. Shiu, 2021. "Establishing a typology of open innovation strategies and their differential impacts on innovation success in an Asia-Pacific developed economy," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 65-89, March.
    10. Marin Alexandru & Boanță Laura, 2018. "Intangible assets as “nucleus” of process innovation," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 592-600, May.
    11. Graciela Corral de Zubielqui & Noel Lindsay & Wendy Lindsay & Janice Jones, 2019. "Knowledge quality, innovation and firm performance: a study of knowledge transfer in SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 145-164, June.
    12. Jane Webb, 2017. "Keeping Alive Inter-Organisational Innovation Through Identity Work And Play," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(05), pages 1-22, June.
    13. Santoro, Gabriele & Bresciani, Stefano & Papa, Armando, 2020. "Collaborative modes with Cultural and Creative Industries and innovation performance: The moderating role of heterogeneous sources of knowledge and absorptive capacity," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 92.
    14. Cécile Ayerbe & Sandra Dubouloz & Sophie Mignon & Marc Robert, 2020. "Management Innovation and Open Innovation: For and Towards Dialogue," Post-Print hal-02985953, HAL.
    15. Pilar Bernal & Idana Salazar & Pilar Vargas, 2019. "Understanding the Open Innovation Trends: An Exploratory Analysis of Breadth and Depth Decisions," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, September.
    16. Lai-Yin Cheah, Sarah & Ho, Yuen-Ping & Li, Shiyu, 2021. "Search strategy, innovation and financial performance of firms in process industries," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    17. Leckel, Anja & Veilleux, Sophie & Dana, Leo Paul, 2020. "Local Open Innovation: A means for public policy to increase collaboration for innovation in SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    18. Saura, Jose Ramon & Palacios-Marqués, Daniel & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo, 2023. "Exploring the boundaries of open innovation: Evidence from social media mining," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    19. Lu, Qinli & Chesbrough, Henry, 2022. "Measuring open innovation practices through topic modelling: Revisiting their impact on firm financial performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    20. Torres de Oliveira, Rui & Verreynne, Martie-Louise & Steen, John & Indulska, Marta, 2021. "Creating value by giving away: A typology of different innovation revealing strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 137-150.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Open Source Product Design; Open innovation; Collaborative design platforms; Product development communities;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01564476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.