IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01555254.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Business performance and angels presence: a fresh look from France 2008–2011

Author

Listed:
  • Luc Tessier

    (UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée)

  • Cécile Fonrouge

    (UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée)

Abstract

Business angels enjoy a strong reputation for being more efficient than other investors among policy makers, practitioners, and scholars. However, due to the limited availability of specific financial data, previous research has barely assessed the impact of angels on companies' performance. This paper seeks to bridge this gap by providing evidence from a unique dataset made up of 432 angel-backed French companies which are compared to two control groups, one randomly selected and another one consisting of similar enterprises. This double comparison process enables us to purge our analysis of structural effect and to demonstrate the importance of the methodology in generating the sample. Indeed, the results we obtain significantly differ depending on the control group. Our results show that the positive influence of angels depends on the condition of the comparison. The set of BA-backed companies is more likely to exhibit superior performance when it is compared to a random sample whereas the companies' performance is either identical or worse when it is compared to a sample composed of k-nearest neighbors. In addition, using a quantile regression technique makes it possible to differentiate the effect of business angels based on the distribution of the value of the growth rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Luc Tessier & Cécile Fonrouge, 2017. "Business performance and angels presence: a fresh look from France 2008–2011," Post-Print hal-01555254, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01555254
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01555254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01555254/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alperovych, Yan & Hübner, Georges & Lobet, Fabrice, 2015. "How does governmental versus private venture capital backing affect a firm's efficiency? Evidence from Belgium," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 508-525.
    2. Shamim Ahmed & Brian Cozzarin, 2009. "Start-up funding sources and biotechnology firm growth," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(13), pages 1341-1345.
    3. Avdeitchikova, Sofia & Landström, Hans, 2014. "The Economic Significance of Business Angels - Towards Comparable Indicators," Ratio Working Papers 248, The Ratio Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joern H. Block & Massimo G. Colombo & Douglas J. Cumming & Silvio Vismara, 2018. "New players in entrepreneurial finance and why they are there," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 239-250, February.
    2. Bonini, Stefano & Capizzi, Vincenzo & Zocchi, Paola, 2019. "The performance of angel-backed companies," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 328-345.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nadine Levratto & Luc Tessier & Cecile Fonrouge, 2018. "Business performance and angels presence: a fresh look from France 2008–2011," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 339-356, February.
    2. Cécile Fonrouge, 2017. "Crowfunding et diasporas: le financement participatif vient-il remettre en cause les acteurs du financement diasporique?," Post-Print hal-01591160, HAL.
    3. Inyoung Park & Jieon Lee & Jungwoo Nam & Yuri Jo & Daeho Lee, 2022. "Which networking strategy improves ICT startup companies' technical efficiency?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2434-2443, September.
    4. Yuejia Zhang, 2018. "Gain or pain? New evidence on mixed syndication between governmental and private venture capital firms in China," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 995-1031, December.
    5. Nawab Khan & Haitao Qu & Jing Qu & ChunMiao Wei & Shihao Wang, 2021. "Does Venture Capital Investment Spur Innovation? A Cross-Countries Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    6. Balz, Frank P. & Brinkmann, Florian & Kanbach, Dominik K., 2023. "The impact of independent and heterogeneous corporate venture capital on firm efficiency," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    7. Lin, Boqiang & Xie, Yongjing, 2024. "The role of venture capital in determining the total factor productivity of renewable energy enterprises: In the context of government subsidy reduction," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    8. Diego Useche & Sophie Pommet, 2021. "Where do we go? VC firm heterogeneity and the exit routes of newly listed high-tech firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1339-1359, October.
    9. Hellmann, Thomas & Montag, Alexander & Tåg, Joacim, 2024. "Tolerating Losses for Growth: J-Curves in Venture Capital Investing," Working Paper Series 1500, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    10. Daniel Keogh & Daniel K.N. Johnson, 2021. "Survival of the funded: Econometric analysis of startup longevity and success," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 17(4), pages 29-49.
    11. R. Rupeika-Apoga S. Saksonova, 2018. "SMEs' Alternative Financing: The Case of Latvia," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 43-52.
    12. Stjepan Srhoj & Bruno Škrinjarić & Sonja Radas, 2021. "Bidding against the odds? The impact evaluation of grants for young micro and small firms during the recession," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 83-103, January.
    13. Jianjun Xu & Lijie Yu & Rakesh Gupta, 2020. "Evaluating the Performance of the Government Venture Capital Guiding Fund Using the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Engberg, Erik & Halvarsson, Daniel & Tingvall, Patrik, 2017. "Direct and Indirect Effects of Private- and Government Sponsored Venture Capital," Ratio Working Papers 288, The Ratio Institute.
    15. Tore Frimanslund, 2022. "Financial Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: An Analysis of Urban and Rural Regions of Norway," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 24-39, June.
    16. Karsai, Judit, 2015. "Állami szerepvállalás a kelet-közép-európai kockázatitőke-piacon [The role of government in the Central and East European venture-capital market]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 1172-1195.
    17. Bertoni, Fabio & Martí, Jose & Reverte, Carmelo, 2019. "The impact of government-supported participative loans on the growth of entrepreneurial ventures," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 371-384.
    18. Kalle Pajunen & Joonas Järvinen, 2018. "To survive or succeed? An analysis of biotechnology firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 757-771, October.
    19. Zhou, Xiaoyang & Xu, Zhongwen & Chai, Jian & Yao, Liming & Wang, Shouyang & Lev, Benjamin, 2019. "Efficiency evaluation for banking systems under uncertainty: A multi-period three-stage DEA model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 68-82.
    20. Annalisa Croce & Jose Martí & Carmelo Reverte, 2019. "The role of private versus governmental venture capital in fostering job creation during the crisis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 879-900, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    business angels;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01555254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.