IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01288937.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le rôle des TIC et du territoire dans la capacité d'innovation des PME : une étude empirique

Author

Listed:
  • Virginie Lethiais

    (MARSOUIN - Môle Armoricain de Recherche sur la SOciété de l'information et des usages d'INternet - UR - Université de Rennes - UEB - Université européenne de Bretagne - European University of Brittany - UBS - Université de Bretagne Sud - ENSAI - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse de l'Information [Bruz] - UBO - Université de Brest - Télécom Bretagne - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - UR2 - Université de Rennes 2, ICI - Laboratoire Information, Coordination, Incitations - UEB - Université européenne de Bretagne - European University of Brittany - UBO - Université de Brest - Télécom Bretagne - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IBSHS - Institut Brestois des Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société - UBO - Université de Brest, DS - Direction Scientifique - Télécom Bretagne - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

  • François Deltour

    (Mines Nantes - Mines Nantes, LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes)

  • Sébastien Le Gall

    (UBS - Université de Bretagne Sud, IREA - Institut de Recherche sur les Entreprises et les Administrations - UBS - Université de Bretagne Sud)

Abstract

La communication étudie le rôle du territoire et des technologies de l'information et de la communication (TIC) dans la capacité d'innovation des entreprises. La recherche analyse spécifiquement l'impact combiné de ces deux facteurs. La recherche s'inscrit dans une approche ressources et fait l'hypothèse que la mobilisation des TIC aura un impact plus important sur la capacité d'innovation des entreprises localisées dans les territoires de faible densité car ces technologies leur permettent de compenser le potentiel en ressources plus restreint de ces territoires. L'investigation empirique s'intéresse à la capacité d'innovation des PME au sens large (lancement de nouveaux produits ou procédés) d'un échantillon représentatif de 1253 PME régionales, complété par des données de localisation (densité des espaces et zone d'emplois). Nos données mettent en évidence un effet positif des TIC sur la capacité d'innovation et un effet relatif de la localisation, qui reste très lié à la mesure adoptée pour caractériser l'environnement territorial. En outre, l'investigation met en évidence l'absence d'effet combiné TIC-densité sur la capacité d'innovation, ce qui invalide notre hypothèse d'un éventuel rôle de compensation des technologies pour les entreprises localisées dans des espaces de faible densité. Ces résultats sont discutés et analysés au regard de la littérature existante.

Suggested Citation

  • Virginie Lethiais & François Deltour & Sébastien Le Gall, 2015. "Le rôle des TIC et du territoire dans la capacité d'innovation des PME : une étude empirique," Post-Print hal-01288937, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01288937
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01288937v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01288937v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mairesse, Jacques & Mohnen, Pierre, 2010. "Using Innovation Surveys for Econometric Analysis," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1129-1155, Elsevier.
    2. Bruce Kogut & Udo Zander, 1992. "Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 383-397, August.
    3. Feldman, Maryann P. & Kogler, Dieter F., 2010. "Stylized Facts in the Geography of Innovation," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 381-410, Elsevier.
    4. Danielle Galliano & Marie-Beno�t Magrini & Pierre Triboulet, 2015. "Marshall's versus Jacobs' Externalities in Firm Innovation Performance: The Case of French Industry," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(11), pages 1840-1858, November.
    5. Paul A. Pavlou & Omar A. El Sawy, 2006. "From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The Case of New Product Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 198-227, September.
    6. Braumoeller, Bear F., 2004. "Hypothesis Testing and Multiplicative Interaction Terms," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 58(4), pages 807-820, October.
    7. Raphaël Suire & Jérôme Vicente, 2008. "Théorie économique des clusters et management des réseaux d'entreprises innovantes," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(4), pages 119-136.
    8. Richard Shearmur, 2011. "Innovation, Regions and Proximity: From Neo-Regionalism to Spatial Analysis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(9), pages 1225-1243, February.
    9. Anne Aguilera & Virginie Lethiais, 2011. "Transmission des connaissances dans les relations de coopération inter-entreprises : TIC versus face à face," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(2), pages 269-293.
    10. Anne Aguilera & Virginie Lethiais & Alain Rallet, 2015. "Spatial Proximity and Intercompany Communication: Myths and Realities," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 798-810, April.
    11. Nadine Massard & Caroline Mehier, 2009. "Proximity and Innovation through an 'Accessibility to Knowledge' Lens," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 77-88.
    12. Frederic Rychen & Jean-Benoit Zimmermann, 2008. "Clusters in the Global Knowledge-based Economy: Knowledge Gatekeepers and Temporary Proximity," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(6), pages 767-776.
    13. Corinne Autant‐Bernard & James P. LeSage, 2011. "Quantifying Knowledge Spillovers Using Spatial Econometric Models," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 471-496, August.
    14. Raphaël Suire & Jérôme Vicente, 2008. "Théorie économique des clusters et management des réseaux," Post-Print halshs-00481858, HAL.
    15. Harald Bathelt & Nina Schuldt, 2008. "Between Luminaires and Meat Grinders: International Trade Fairs as Temporary Clusters," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(6), pages 853-868.
    16. Prasanna Tambe & Lorin M. Hitt & Erik Brynjolfsson, 2012. "The Extroverted Firm: How External Information Practices Affect Innovation and Productivity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 843-859, May.
    17. Michelle Mongo, 2013. "Les déterminants de l'innovation : une analyse comparative service/industrie à partir des formes d'innovation développées," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 71-108.
    18. Rajiv D. Banker & Indranil Bardhan & Ozer Asdemir, 2006. "Understanding the Impact of Collaboration Software on Product Design and Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 352-373, December.
    19. Sinan Aral & Peter Weill, 2007. "IT Assets, Organizational Capabilities, and Firm Performance: How Resource Allocations and Organizational Differences Explain Performance Variation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(5), pages 763-780, October.
    20. Bruce Kogut, 2000. "The network as knowledge: generative rules and the emergence of structure," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 405-425, March.
    21. Stefano Breschi & Francesco Lissoni, 2009. "Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(4), pages 439-468, July.
    22. Torre, André, 2010. "Jalons pour une analyse dynamique des Proximités," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Editions NecPlus, vol. 2010(03), pages 409-437, September.
    23. Bart Nooteboom, 2000. "Learning by Interaction: Absorptive Capacity, Cognitive Distance and Governance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 4(1), pages 69-92, March.
    24. Michelle Mongo, 2013. "Les déterminants de l'innovation : une analyse comparative service/industrie à partir des formes d'innovation développées," Post-Print hal-00931210, HAL.
    25. Corinne Autant-Bernard & James Lesage, 2011. "Quantifying knowledge spillovers using spatial econometric tools," Post-Print halshs-00617709, HAL.
    26. Freel, Mark S., 2003. "Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 751-770, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. François Deltour & Sébastien Le Gall & Virginie Lethiais, 2017. "Innovating not Only in Cities: Evidence from SMEs," Post-Print hal-01758281, HAL.
    2. Abbasiharofteh, Milad & Kogler, Dieter F. & Lengyel, Balázs, 2023. "Atypical combinations of technologies in regional co-inventor networks," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 52(10), pages 1-1.
    3. Robert Huggins & Piers Thompson, 2015. "Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: a network theory," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 103-128, June.
    4. Lorenzo CASSI & Emilie-Pauline GALLIÉ & Agénor LAHATTE & Valérie MERINDOL, 2018. "Scientific network centrality of European regions: the role of territorial resources," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 47, pages 5-26.
    5. Peng Huang & Marco Ceccagnoli & Chris Forman & D.J. Wu, 2022. "IT Knowledge Spillovers, Absorptive Capacity, and Productivity: Evidence from Enterprise Software," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 908-934, September.
    6. Rosina Moreno & Ernest Miguélez, 2012. "A Relational Approach To The Geography Of Innovation: A Typology Of Regions," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 492-516, July.
    7. Gallo, Julie Le & Plunket, Anne, 2020. "Regional gatekeepers, inventor networks and inventive performance: Spatial and organizational channels," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(5).
    8. Fritsch, Michael & Changoluisa, Javier, 2017. "New business formation and the productivity of manufacturing incumbents: Effects and mechanisms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 237-259.
    9. Indranil Bardhan & Viswanathan Krishnan & Shu Lin, 2013. "Research Note ---Business Value of Information Technology: Testing the Interaction Effect of IT and R&D on Tobin's Q," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1147-1161, December.
    10. Martin M�ller & Allison Stewart, 2016. "Does Temporary Geographical Proximity Predict Learning? Knowledge Dynamics in the Olympic Games," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 377-390, March.
    11. Tubiana, Matteo & Miguelez, Ernest & Moreno, Rosina, 2022. "In knowledge we trust: Learning-by-interacting and the productivity of inventors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    12. Timo Mitze & Teemu Makkonen, 2020. "When interaction matters: the contingent effects of spatial knowledge spillovers and internal R&I on firm productivity," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1088-1120, August.
    13. Gianni Guastella & Frank G. van Oort, 2015. "Regional Heterogeneity and Interregional Research Spillovers in European Innovation: Modelling and Policy Implications," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(11), pages 1772-1787, November.
    14. Umut Yilmaz Cetinkaya & Erkan Erdil, 2015. "Cohesion and Competition of Europe: Policy Suggestions from The Perspective of Network and Entropy," STPS Working Papers 1505, STPS - Science and Technology Policy Studies Center, Middle East Technical University, revised Dec 2015.
    15. Umut Yilmaz Cetinkaya & Erkan Erdil, 2016. "Cohesion and Competition of Europe: Innovation Policy from the Perspective of Networks and Entropy," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 10(4), pages 7-24.
    16. Olivier Brossard & Inès Moussa, 2012. "The trilogy of knowledge spillovers in French regions: a history of nature, channels and boundaries," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1207, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised May 2012.
    17. Grzegorz Micek, 2019. "Geographical Proximity Paradox Revisited: The Case of IT Service SMEs in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Clément Gorin, 2017. "Accessibility, absorptive capacity and innovation in European urban areas," Working Papers 1722, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    19. Sylvie Charlot & Riccardo Crescenzi & Antonio Musolesi, 2014. "Augmented and Unconstrained: revisiting the Regional Knowledge Production Function," SEEDS Working Papers 2414, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Aug 2014.
    20. Corinne Autant-Bernard, 2015. "Que savons-nous de l’impact économique des parcs scientifiques ? Une revue de la littérature," Working Papers halshs-01211662, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01288937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.