IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01221380.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quel traitement des déchets par l'analyse économique ?

Author

Listed:
  • Veronique Thireau

    (CHROME - Détection, évaluation, gestion des risques CHROniques et éMErgents (CHROME) / Université de Nîmes - UNIMES - Université de Nîmes)

Abstract

Les déchets nucléaires ont une traduction juridique sous forme de règles, de normes, de lois mais ont t-ils une (ou plusieurs) existence(s) en termes économiques ? Si oui, que nous révèle cette ou plutôt ces dernières ?

Suggested Citation

  • Veronique Thireau, 2014. "Quel traitement des déchets par l'analyse économique ?," Post-Print hal-01221380, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01221380
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01221380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01221380/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bertrand Villeneuve, 2013. "Stratégie optimale de stockage de déchets radioactifs à vie longue sous contrainte de capacité," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 64(4), pages 635-649.
    2. Alain Ayong Le Kama & Mouez Fodha, 2009. "Stockage des déchets radioactifs et incertitude," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(4), pages 39-52.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9333 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Christian Gollier & Jean-Guy Devezeaux de Lavergne, 2001. "Analyse quantitative de la réversibilité du stockage des déchets nucléaires : valorisation des déchets," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 149(3), pages 1-13.
    5. Christian Gollier, 2007. "Comment intégrer le risque dans le calcul économique ?," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 117(2), pages 209-223.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Axel Pierru & Walid Matar, 2014. "The Impact of Oil Price Volatility on Welfare in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Implications for Public Investment Decision-making," The Energy Journal, , vol. 35(2), pages 97-116, April.
    2. Alain Ayong Le Kama & Mouez Fodha, 2009. "Stockage des déchets radioactifs et incertitude," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(4), pages 39-52.
    3. Jouvet, Pierre-André & Le Cadre, Elodie & Orset, Caroline, 2012. "Irreversible investment, uncertainty, and ambiguity: The case of bioenergy sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 45-53.
    4. Christian Gollier, 2005. "Quel taux d actualisation pour quel avenir ?," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 19(4), pages 59-81.
    5. Nicolas PILUSO & Clément RAU, 2016. "Les Investissements De Sécurisation Des Sites Industriels À Risque Et La Concertation Entre Firmes Et Riverains : Une Approche Théorique," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 43, pages 59-76.
    6. Thomas Sterner & U. Martin Persson, 2008. "An Even Sterner Review: Introducing Relative Prices into the Discounting Debate," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 2(1), pages 61-76, Winter.
    7. Nicole El Karoui & Mohamed Mrad & Caroline Hillairet, 2014. "Ramsey Rule with Progressive utility and Long Term Affine Yields Curves," Post-Print hal-00974831, HAL.
    8. Nicolas Piluso, 2023. "Confrontation between shareholders and local residents over safety investments in high-risk industries," Economic Analysis Letters, Anser Press, vol. 2(3), pages 54-66, July.
    9. Nicolas Piluso, 2017. "La concertation sur les risques industriels : une modélisation," Working Papers hal-01448420, HAL.
    10. Michalis Skourtos & Dimitris Damigos & Areti Kontogianni & Christos Tourkolias & Alistair Hunt, 2019. "Embedding Preference Uncertainty for Environmental Amenities in Climate Change Economic Assessments: A “Random” Step Forward," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-22, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    dechets nucléaires; économie;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01221380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.