IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00822969.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Réduire les risques des décisions stratégiques dans les nouveaux environnements concurrentiels incertains : Cas des Entreprises Publiques Algériennes

Author

Listed:
  • Abdelkader Baaziz

    (IRSIC - Institut de Recherche en Sciences de l'Information et de Communication - AMU - Aix Marseille Université, AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Luc Quoniam

    (IRSIC - Institut de Recherche en Sciences de l'Information et de Communication - AMU - Aix Marseille Université, UTLN - Université de Toulon)

Abstract

Les bouleversements économiques qui secouent le monde, n'ont pas épargné les pays en voie de développement comme l'Algérie et ont touché la quasi-totalité des secteurs économiques y compris ceux considérés comme stratégiques en bénéficiant de la protection de l'Etat, tels que le domaine minier ou le secteur des hydrocarbures. Les entreprises algériennes se retrouvent ainsi dans un environnement concurrentiel exacerbé dus aux choix de l'économie de marché et doivent faire face à ces bouleversements qui se traduisent par l'émergence de nouveaux concurrents entrant sur un marché national traditionnellement protégé. Par ailleurs, dans ce contexte concurrentiel indiqué, l'entreprises algérienne ne peut plus compter uniquement sur ses capacités internes. Elles doivent s'ouvrir sur l'extérieur, de se créer des partenariats, aussi bien avec ses clients, ses fournisseurs, les universités et parfois même avec ses concurrents. D'où la nécessité pour ces entreprises, de : 1. Adopter de nouvelles formes d'organisation résilientes ; 2. Mettre en place un système d'information stratégique permettant une meilleure visibilité pour un pilotage adéquat de leurs activités et capable de : - fédérer ses connaissances, ses savoirs et son savoir-faire critiques, - scanner l'environnement externe où elle opère afin de détecter des signaux favorables à son positionnement, - facilite la prise de décision tout en réduisant les risques inhérents à ses choix stratégiques. Ici interviennent les concepts de Knowledge Management (KM), d'Intelligence Economique (IE) et de Business Intelligence (BI) à différents niveaux du management : du stratégique à l'opérationnel.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdelkader Baaziz & Luc Quoniam, 2013. "Réduire les risques des décisions stratégiques dans les nouveaux environnements concurrentiels incertains : Cas des Entreprises Publiques Algériennes," Post-Print hal-00822969, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00822969
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00822969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00822969/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdelkader Baaziz, 2006. "Apport du Knowledge Management dans l'amélioration de la prise de décision dans une Organisation," Post-Print hal-00823872, HAL.
    2. Zimmermann, H. -J., 2000. "An application-oriented view of modeling uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 190-198, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dias, Luis C. & Climaco, Joao N., 2005. "Dealing with imprecise information in group multicriteria decisions: a methodology and a GDSS architecture," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(2), pages 291-307, January.
    2. Manuel E. SANSALVADOR & José M. BROTONS, 2017. "The Application of OWAs in Expertise Processes: The Development of a Model for the Quantification of Hidden Quality Costs," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 51(3), pages 73-90.
    3. Kikuchi, Shinya & Chakroborty, Partha, 2006. "Place of possibility theory in transportation analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(8), pages 595-615, September.
    4. Paulo Afonso & Vishad Vyas & Ana Antunes & Sérgio Silva & Boris P. J. Bret, 2021. "A Stochastic Approach for Product Costing in Manufacturing Processes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Püschel, Tim & Schryen, Guido & Hristova, Diana & Neumann, Dirk, 2015. "Revenue management for Cloud computing providers: Decision models for service admission control under non-probabilistic uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 637-647.
    6. Wulf, David & Bertsch, Valentin, 2016. "A natural language generation approach to support understanding and traceability of multi-dimensional preferential sensitivity analysis in multi-criteria decision making," MPRA Paper 75025, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Hocine, Amine & Kouaissah, Noureddine, 2020. "XOR analytic hierarchy process and its application in the renewable energy sector," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    8. Abdelkader Baaziz & Luc Quoniam, 2014. "Contribution to reduce risks related to strategic decisions in new uncertain competitive environments: The case of Algerian State-Owned Firms," Post-Print hal-01016127, HAL.
    9. Chan, Pang & Hui, Chi-Wai & Li, Wenkai & Sakamoto, Haruo & Hirata, Kentaro & Li, Pu, 2006. "Long-term electricity contract optimization with demand uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(13), pages 2469-2485.
    10. Kangas, Annika S. & Kangas, Jyrki, 2004. "Probability, possibility and evidence: approaches to consider risk and uncertainty in forestry decision analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 169-188, March.
    11. Marcin Kulik & Rafał Gabor & Mariusz Jagieła, 2022. "Surrogate Model for Design Uncertainty Estimation of Nonlinear Electromagnetic Vibration Energy Harvester," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Heckmann, Iris & Comes, Tina & Nickel, Stefan, 2015. "A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 119-132.
    13. Coit, David W. & Zio, Enrico, 2019. "The evolution of system reliability optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    14. Goyal, S. K. & Giri, B. C., 2001. "Recent trends in modeling of deteriorating inventory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 1-16, October.
    15. Violeta Keršulienė & Zenonas Turskis, 2014. "A hybrid linguistic fuzzy multiple criteria group selection of a chief accounting officer," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 232-252, April.
    16. Mohammaddust, Faeghe & Rezapour, Shabnam & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Mofidfar, Mohammad & Hill, Alex, 2017. "Developing lean and responsive supply chains: A robust model for alternative risk mitigation strategies in supply chain designs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 632-653.
    17. Amin Vafadarnikjoo & Madjid Tavana & Tiago Botelho & Konstantinos Chalvatzis, 2020. "A neutrosophic enhanced best–worst method for considering decision-makers’ confidence in the best and worst criteria," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(2), pages 391-418, June.
    18. Janssen, J.A.E.B. & Krol, M.S. & Schielen, R.M.J. & Hoekstra, A.Y. & de Kok, J.-L., 2010. "Assessment of uncertainties in expert knowledge, illustrated in fuzzy rule-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(9), pages 1245-1251.
    19. Kijazi, Martin Herbert & Kant, Shashi, 2011. "Social acceptability of alternative forest regimes in Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, using stakeholder attitudes as metrics of uncertainty," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 242-257, April.
    20. de Brito, Marisa P. & van der Laan, Erwin A., 2009. "Inventory control with product returns: The impact of imperfect information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 85-101, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00822969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.