IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00420098.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

De la singularité de l'écopreneuriat dans les contextes français et libanais : quels enseignements pour le contexte algérien ?

Author

Listed:
  • Amale Kharrouby

    (CIRAME - Centre International de Recherches et d'Applications en Management et Economie - USEK)

  • Thierry Levy-Tadjine

    (CIRAME - Centre International de Recherches et d'Applications en Management et Economie - USEK)

Abstract

S'intéressant à l'écopreneuriat (c'est-à-dire aux entreprises conduites par des acteurs contribuant au développement durable), et prenant appui sur des études de cas réalisées dans le contexte libanais et dans le contexte français, l'objet de ce travail est à la fois de définir l'éco-entrepreneuriat et de questionner son éventuelle singularité. On peut se demander en particulier si les outils usuels d'appui à l'entrepreneuriat sont adaptés pour l'écopreneuriat ou non. Par la suite, cette réflexion peut permettre d'éclairer la réflexion des pouvoirs publics sur les moyens d'encourager le développement de l'écopreneuriat et nous concluons le papier en proposant quelques leviers d'actions concrets qui nous paraissent transposables au contexte algérien.

Suggested Citation

  • Amale Kharrouby & Thierry Levy-Tadjine, 2005. "De la singularité de l'écopreneuriat dans les contextes français et libanais : quels enseignements pour le contexte algérien ?," Post-Print hal-00420098, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00420098
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00420098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00420098/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Palich, Leslie E. & Ray Bagby, D., 1995. "Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 10(6), pages 425-438, November.
    2. Forbes, Daniel P., 2005. "Are some entrepreneurs more overconfident than others?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 623-640, September.
    3. Busenitz, Lowell W. & Barney, Jay B., 1997. "Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 9-30, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernard Simon & Amale Kharrouby & Thierry Levy-Tadjine, 2012. "L'éco-entrepreneuriat, un objet de gestion non identifié ?," Working Papers hal-00822234, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel Mongrut & Nidia Juárez, 2018. "Valuation of Start-ups: A Behavioral and Strategic Perspective," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 13(3), pages 419-439, Julio-Sep.
    2. Sandri, Serena & Schade, Christian & Mußhoff, Oliver & Odening, Martin, 2010. "Holding on for too long? An experimental study on inertia in entrepreneurs' and non-entrepreneurs' disinvestment choices," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 30-44, October.
    3. Jahangir Yadollahi Farsi & Pouria Nouri & Abdollah Ahmadi Kafeshani, 2015. "Exploring the Interconnections between Sense making, Heuristics and Biases in the Field of Entrepreneurship," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 6(2), pages 121-128.
    4. Dubard Barbosa, Saulo & Fayolle, Alain & Smith, Brett R., 2019. "Biased and overconfident, unbiased but going for it: How framing and anchoring affect the decision to start a new venture," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 528-557.
    5. Kraft, Priscilla S. & Günther, Christina & Kammerlander, Nadine H. & Lampe, Jan, 2022. "Overconfidence and entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of different types of overconfidence in the entrepreneurial process," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4).
    6. McKelvie, Alexander & Haynie, J. Michael & Gustavsson, Veronica, 2011. "Unpacking the uncertainty construct: Implications for entrepreneurial action," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 273-292, May.
    7. Andreas Hack & Frauke Bieberstein & Nils D. Kraiczy, 2016. "Reference point formation and new venture creation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 447-465, March.
    8. Najoua Dali & Sana Harbi, 2016. "The Effect of Risk Perception and Cognitive Biases on the Evaluation of Opportunity in Family and Non-Family Entrepreneurs: The Case of Tunisian Entrepreneurs," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(03), pages 281-312, September.
    9. Burmeister, Katrin & Schade, Christian, 2007. "Are entrepreneurs' decisions more biased? An experimental investigation of the susceptibility to status quo bias," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 340-362, May.
    10. Verheul, I. & Carree, M.A., 2008. "Overoptimism among Founders: The Role of Information and Motivation," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2008-008-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    11. Deniz Ucbasaran & Mike Wright & Paul Westhead, 2006. "Entrepreneurial Entry, Exit and Re-Entry: The Extent and Nature of Opportunity Identification," Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy 2006-09, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy Group.
    12. Simon, Mark & Shrader, Rodney C., 2012. "Entrepreneurial actions and optimistic overconfidence: The role of motivated reasoning in new product introductions," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 291-309.
    13. Arno Nuijten & Nick Benschop & Antoinette Rijsenbilt & Kristinka Wilmink, 2020. "Cognitive Biases in Critical Decisions Facing SME Entrepreneurs: An External Accountants’ Perspective," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, November.
    14. Megan K. Haller & Eric W. Welch, 2014. "Entrepreneurial Behavior of Academic Scientists: Network and Cognitive Determinants of Commitment to Grant Submissions and Award Outcomes," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 38(4), pages 807-831, July.
    15. Saulo Dubard Barbosa & Alain Fayolle & Brett Smith, 2019. "Biased and overconfident, unbiased but going for it: How framing and anchoring affect the decision to start a new venture," Post-Print hal-01988083, HAL.
    16. Oliver Thomas, 2018. "Two decades of cognitive bias research in entrepreneurship: What do we know and where do we go from here?," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 107-143, April.
    17. Lovgren Adam & Ross R. Brent & Leschewski Andrea & Peterson H. Christopher, 2020. "Do Entrepreneurial Assistance Programs Create Value for Agri-Food Entrepreneurs?," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    18. T. K. Das & Bing-Sheng Teng, 1998. "Time and Entrepreneurial Risk Behavior," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 22(2), pages 69-88, January.
    19. Grichnik, Dietmar & Smeja, Alexander & Welpe, Isabell, 2010. "The importance of being emotional: How do emotions affect entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation and exploitation?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 15-29, October.
    20. Eden S. Blair, 2010. "What You Think Is Not What You Think: Unconsciousness and Entrepreneurial Behavior," Chapters, in: Angela A. Stanton & Mellani Day & Isabell M. Welpe (ed.), Neuroeconomics and the Firm, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00420098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.