IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fce/doctra/2007.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L’impact du CIR sur les personnels de la recherche

Author

Listed:
  • Evens Salies

    (Sciences Po-OFCE)

Abstract

This paper surveys the literature on the impact of the French research tax credit on scientists, engineers and other R&D personnel. After reviewing the effect of this subsidy on the user cost of R&D capital, we compare the results of several econometric evaluations of its effectiveness. They reveal, among other things, that the research tax credit corrects discrimination in the hiring of PhD scientists, but with a windfall effect for PhD-engineers. In very small businesses, R&D employment aid (R&D tax credit inclusive) acts to the detriment of unaided employment. Finally, with only 2.5% of R&D activities outsourced to public research bodies, there is no visible effect on their personnel. Given that most R&D expenditures represent staff salaries, these results support previous evidence that research tax incentive has a moderate effect on aggregated R&D in France. They also question changes from the original intent of policy makers when the research tax credit was created in 1983: to remedy for failures in the market for knowledge, not to subsidize highly qualified labour costs as a tool for competitiveness, alongside cuts in employers’ social security contributions on less-skilled labor. The paper concludes with a discussion of the relevance of recent reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Evens Salies, 2020. "L’impact du CIR sur les personnels de la recherche," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2020-07, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
  • Handle: RePEc:fce:doctra:2007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ofce.sciences-po.fr/pdf/dtravail/OFCEWP2020-07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evens Salies, 2017. "Impact du crédit d'impôt recherche : une revue bibliographique des études sur données françaises," Post-Print hal-02314754, HAL.
    2. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5bk313f6su82nbb5brte3kl24i is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Pierre Courtioux & Emmanuelle Deglaire & François Métivier & Antoine Rebérioux, 2019. "Quel Est Le Rendement Du Crédit Impôt Recherche Pour Les Entreprises ?," Post-Print hal-02124480, HAL.
    4. Thomas Neubig & Fernando Galindo-Rueda & Silvia Appelt & Chiara Criscuolo & Matej Bajgar, 2016. "Fiscal incentives for R&D and innovation in a diverse world," OECD Taxation Working Papers 27, OECD Publishing.
    5. Kenneth Arrow, 1962. "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention," NBER Chapters, in: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pages 609-626, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7nt3ogjllv9vkodi7i1r53meiq is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Thomas Amossé & Bruno Ducoudré & Christine Erhel & Arnaud Mias & Carine Ollivier & Camille Peugny & Laure Pitti & Géraldine Rieucau & Véronique Simonnet, 2019. "Passer en revue quarante ans de Travail et Emploi," Travail et Emploi, La DARES, vol. 0(2), pages 7-42.
    8. Emmanuel Duguet, 2012. "The effect of the incremental R&D tax credit on the private funding of R&D an econometric evaluation on french firm level data," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 122(3), pages 405-435.
    9. repec:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2017_num_493_1_10770 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Pierre Möhnen, 2017. "Comment: Effectiveness of public support for R&D and entrepreneurship," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 493, pages 43-48.
    11. Evens Salies, 2017. "Impact du Crédit d’impôt recherche. Une revue bibliographique des études sur données françaises," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(5), pages 95-130.
    12. Marino, Marianna & Lhuillery, Stephane & Parrotta, Pierpaolo & Sala, Davide, 2016. "Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D subsidy on private R&D expenditure," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1715-1730.
    13. Meyer, Bruce D, 1995. "Natural and Quasi-experiments in Economics," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 13(2), pages 151-161, April.
    14. Pierre Courtioux & Emmanuelle Deglaire & François Métivier & Antoine Rebérioux, 2019. "Quel est le rendement du crédit impôt recherche pour les entreprises ?," Working Papers hal-02124480, HAL.
    15. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/2daq83791f958ob7v2t27f2vg2 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Benjamin Montmartin, 2018. "Le policy-mix français de soutien à la R&D privée : quelles réalités pour quels résultats ?," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03471622, HAL.
    17. Maurice Baslé & Jean Michel Josselin & Benoît Le Maux, 2018. "Dispositifs d’évaluation des politiques publiques et des programmes : connaissances de base, choix des méthodes, sociogramme des acteurs et études de cas," Post-Print halshs-01962582, HAL.
    18. Ientile, Damien & Mairesse, Jacques, 2009. "A policy to boost R&D: Does the R&D tax credit work?," EIB Papers 6/2009, European Investment Bank, Economics Department.
    19. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/2fp0058noc9hdpc70i40c934t3 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7mboadgfvr8h3avm8s867a2rtf is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/7mboadgfvr8h3avm8s867a2rtf is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Evens Salies, 2017. "Etudes d’impact du crédit d’impôt recherche (CIR)," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03613592, HAL.
    4. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/59b98fs2bu8neb8h5au501rtll is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/59b98fs2bu8neb8h5au501rtll is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Dimos, Christos & Pugh, Geoff & Hisarciklilar, Mehtap & Talam, Ema & Jackson, Ian, 2022. "The relative effectiveness of R&D tax credits and R&D subsidies: A comparative meta-regression analysis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    7. Daniel Gama e Colombo, 2016. "Impact Assessment of Tax Incentives to Foster Industrial Innovation in Brazil: The Case of Law 11,196/05," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2016_30, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    8. Chih‐Hai Yang & Chia‐Hui Huang & Wei‐Hsuan Chang, 2021. "Does Reduction In The Tax Credit Rate Retard R&D Activity? Evidence From Taiwan'S R&D Tax Credit Reform In 2010," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(2), pages 398-415, April.
    9. Montmartin, Benjamin & Herrera, Marcos & Massard, Nadine, 2018. "The impact of the French policy mix on business R&D: How geography matters," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 2010-2027.
    10. Vincent Dortet-Bernadet & Michaël Sicsic, 2017. "The effect of R&D subsidies and tax incentives on employment: an evaluation for small firms in France," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 493, pages 5-22.
    11. Ugur, Mehmet & Trushin, Eshref, 2018. "Asymmetric information and heterogeneous effects of R&D subsidies: evidence on R&D investment and employment of R&D personel," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 21943, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    12. Yu, Feifei & Wang, Liting & Li, Xiaotong, 2020. "The effects of government subsidies on new energy vehicle enterprises: The moderating role of intelligent transformation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Pöschel, Carla, 2020. "Incentive Effects of R&D Tax Incentives: A Meta-Analysis Focusing on R&D Tax Policy Designs," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 243, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre, revised 2020.
    14. Cristiano Antonelli, 2020. "Knowledge exhaustibility public support to business R&D and the additionality constraint," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 649-663, June.
    15. Stjepan Srhoj & Michael Lapinski & Janette Walde, 2019. "Size matters? Impact evaluation of business development grants on SME performance," Working Papers 2019-14, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    16. Cameron Hepburn & Jacquelyn Pless & David Popp, 2018. "Policy Brief—Encouraging Innovation that Protects Environmental Systems: Five Policy Proposals," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 12(1), pages 154-169.
    17. A. Bozio & D. Irac & L. Py, 2014. "Impact of research tax credit on R&D and innovation: evidence from the 2008 French reform," Working papers 532, Banque de France.
    18. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7rrsl07p559bjr85tr7hsft1o9 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. André Spithoven, Belgian Science Policy Office and Ghent University & Michel Dumont & Peter Teirlinck, Belgian Science Policy Office and KU Leuven, 2014. "Working Paper 08-14 - Public support for R&D and the educational mix of R&D employees," Working Papers 1408, Federal Planning Bureau, Belgium.
    20. Elina Ladinska & Marielle Non & Bas Straathof, 2015. "More R&D with tax incentives? A meta-analysis," CPB Discussion Paper 309.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    21. Gergő Tóth & Balázs Lengyel, 2021. "Inter-firm inventor mobility and the role of co-inventor networks in producing high-impact innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 117-137, February.
    22. Archibugi, Daniele & Filippetti, Andrea, 2018. "The retreat of public research and its adverse consequences on innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 97-111.
    23. Xuan Wei & Ranran Liu & Wei Chen, 2022. "How the COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts Green Inventions: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    24. Kwangsoo Shin & Minkyung Choy & Chul Lee & Gunno Park, 2019. "Government R&D Subsidy and Additionality of Biotechnology Firms: The Case of the South Korean Biotechnology Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, March.
    25. Liliana Gelabert & Martín Pereyra & Flavia Roldán, 2021. "Public support prevalence and innovation behavior. Uruguay 2007-2015," Documentos de Investigación 127, Universidad ORT Uruguay. Facultad de Administración y Ciencias Sociales.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research public policy; R&D investment; Productivity; Causal inference;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • C31 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models; Quantile Regressions; Social Interaction Models
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fce:doctra:2007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Francesco Saraceno (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ofcspfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.