IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ewp/wpaper/310web.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Some optimization and decision problems in proportional reinsurance

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Castañer

    (Facultat d'Economia i Empresa; Universitat de Barcelona (UB))

  • M.Mercè Claramunt

    (Facultat d'Economia i Empresa; Universitat de Barcelona (UB))

  • Maite Mármol

    (Facultat d'Economia i Empresa; Universitat de Barcelona (UB))

Abstract

Reinsurance is one of the tools that an insurer can use to mitigate the underwriting risk and then to control its solvency. In this paper, we focus on the proportional reinsurance arrangements and we examine several optimization and decision problems of the insurer with respect to the reinsurance strategy. To this end, we use as decision tools not only the probability of ruin but also the random variable deficit at ruin if ruin occurs. The discounted penalty function (Gerber & Shiu, 1998) is employed to calculate as particular cases the probability of ruin and the moments and the distribution function of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs. We consider the classical risk theory model assuming a Poisson process and an individual claim amount phase-type distributed, modified with a proportional reinsurance with a retention level that is not constant and depends on the level of the surplus. Depending on whether the initial surplus is below or above a threshold level, the discounted penalty function behaves differently. General expressions for this discounted penalty function are obtained, as well as interesting theoretical results and explicit expressions for phase-type 2 distribution. These results are applied in numerical examples of decision problems based on the probability of ruin and on different risk measures of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs (the expectation, the Value at Risk and the Tail Value at Risk).

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Castañer & M.Mercè Claramunt & Maite Mármol, 2014. "Some optimization and decision problems in proportional reinsurance," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2014/310, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ewp:wpaper:310web
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ub.edu/ubeconomics/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/310-Web.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willmot, Gordon E., 2007. "On the discounted penalty function in the renewal risk model with general interclaim times," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 17-31, July.
    2. Asmussen, Soren & Rolski, Tomasz, 1992. "Computational methods in risk theory: A matrix-algorithmic approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 259-274, January.
    3. Hans Gerber & Elias Shiu, 1998. "On the Time Value of Ruin," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 48-72.
    4. Hipp, Christian, 2006. "Speedy convolution algorithms and Panjer recursions for phase-type distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 176-188, February.
    5. Gerber, Hans U. & Goovaerts, Marc J. & Kaas, Rob, 1987. "On the Probability and Severity of Ruin," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 151-163, November.
    6. Anna Castañer & M. Claramunt & Maite Mármol, 2012. "Ruin probability and time of ruin with a proportional reinsurance threshold strategy," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 20(3), pages 614-638, October.
    7. Dutang, Christophe & Goulet, Vincent & Pigeon, Mathieu, 2008. "actuar: An R Package for Actuarial Science," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 25(i07).
    8. Castañer, A. & Claramunt, M.M. & Lefèvre, C., 2013. "Survival probabilities in bivariate risk models, with application to reinsurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 632-642.
    9. Dickson, David C. M. & Waters, Howard R., 1996. "Reinsurance and ruin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 61-80, December.
    10. Centeno, Maria de Lourdes, 2002. "Measuring the effects of reinsurance by the adjustment coefficient in the Sparre Anderson model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 37-49, February.
    11. Centeno, Lourdes, 1986. "Measuring the effects of reinsurance by the adjustment coefficient," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 169-182, April.
    12. Dimitrova, Dimitrina S. & Kaishev, Vladimir K., 2010. "Optimal joint survival reinsurance: An efficient frontier approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 27-35, August.
    13. Vincent Goulet & Christophe Dutang & Mathieu Pigeon, 2008. "actuar : An R Package for Actuarial Science," Post-Print hal-01616144, HAL.
    14. Bladt, Mogens, 2005. "A Review on Phase-type Distributions and their Use in Risk Theory," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 145-161, May.
    15. Kaishev, Vladimir K. & Dimitrova, Dimitrina S., 2006. "Excess of loss reinsurance under joint survival optimality," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 376-389, December.
    16. de Lourdes Centeno, Maria, 2005. "Dependent risks and excess of loss reinsurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 229-238, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Castañer & M. Claramunt & Maite Mármol, 2012. "Ruin probability and time of ruin with a proportional reinsurance threshold strategy," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 20(3), pages 614-638, October.
    2. Castañer, A. & Claramunt, M.M. & Lefèvre, C., 2013. "Survival probabilities in bivariate risk models, with application to reinsurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 632-642.
    3. Hu, Xiang & Duan, Baige & Zhang, Lianzeng, 2017. "De Vylder approximation to the optimal retention for a combination of quota-share and excess of loss reinsurance with partial information," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 48-55.
    4. Schmidli, Hanspeter, 2010. "On the Gerber-Shiu function and change of measure," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 3-11, February.
    5. Albrecher, Hansjörg & Cheung, Eric C.K. & Liu, Haibo & Woo, Jae-Kyung, 2022. "A bivariate Laguerre expansions approach for joint ruin probabilities in a two-dimensional insurance risk process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 96-118.
    6. Michael V. Boutsikas & Konstadinos Politis, 2017. "Exit Times, Overshoot and Undershoot for a Surplus Process in the Presence of an Upper Barrier," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 75-95, March.
    7. Franck Adékambi & Essodina Takouda, 2020. "Gerber–Shiu Function in a Class of Delayed and Perturbed Risk Model with Dependence," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, March.
    8. repec:jss:jstsof:35:i10 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Meng, Hui & Siu, Tak Kuen, 2011. "On optimal reinsurance, dividend and reinvestment strategies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(1-2), pages 211-218, January.
    10. Kull, Andreas, 2009. "Sharing Risk – An Economic Perspective," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 591-613, November.
    11. Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Wang, Melantha & Wong, Bernard, 2021. "SynthETIC: An individual insurance claim simulator with feature control," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 296-308.
    12. Dutang, C. & Lefèvre, C. & Loisel, S., 2013. "On an asymptotic rule A+B/u for ultimate ruin probabilities under dependence by mixing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 774-785.
    13. Psarrakos, Georgios & Politis, Konstadinos, 2008. "Tail bounds for the joint distribution of the surplus prior to and at ruin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 163-176, February.
    14. K. G. Reddy & M. G. M. Khan, 2020. "stratifyR: An R Package for optimal stratification and sample allocation for univariate populations," Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, Australian Statistical Publishing Association Inc., vol. 62(3), pages 383-405, September.
    15. Wenjun Jiang & Jiandong Ren & Ričardas Zitikis, 2017. "Optimal Reinsurance Policies under the VaR Risk Measure When the Interests of Both the Cedent and the Reinsurer Are Taken into Account," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-22, February.
    16. Albrecher, Hansjörg & Constantinescu, Corina & Pirsic, Gottlieb & Regensburger, Georg & Rosenkranz, Markus, 2010. "An algebraic operator approach to the analysis of Gerber-Shiu functions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 42-51, February.
    17. Lin, X. Sheldon & Willmot, Gordon E., 2000. "The moments of the time of ruin, the surplus before ruin, and the deficit at ruin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 19-44, August.
    18. Cheung, Eric C.K., 2011. "A generalized penalty function in Sparre Andersen risk models with surplus-dependent premium," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 384-397, May.
    19. Centeno, Maria de Lourdes, 2002. "Excess of loss reinsurance and Gerber's inequality in the Sparre Anderson model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 415-427, December.
    20. Tang, Qihe & Wei, Li, 2010. "Asymptotic aspects of the Gerber-Shiu function in the renewal risk model using Wiener-Hopf factorization and convolution equivalence," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 19-31, February.
    21. Ren, Jiandong, 2009. "A connection between the discounted and non-discounted expected penalty functions in the Sparre Andersen risk model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 324-330, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Deficit at ruin; Gerber-Shiu function; Risk measures.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ewp:wpaper:310web. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: University of Barcelona School of Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feubaes.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.