IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/19063.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Hierarchical and Circular Flow Structure of the Interfirm Transaction Network in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Yuichi KICHIKAWA
  • Takashi IINO
  • Hiroshi IYETOMI
  • Hiroyasu INOUE

Abstract

The objective of this study is to shed new light on the industrial flow structure embedded in microscopic supplier-buyer relations. We first construct directed networks from actual data from interfirm transaction relations in Japan; as one example, the dataset compiled by the Tokyo Shoko Research, Ltd. in 2016 contains five million links between one million firms. Then, we analyze the industrial flow structure of such a large-scale network with a special emphasis on its hierarchy and circularity. The Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition enables us to break down the flow on a directed network into two flow components: gradient flow and circular flow. The gradient flow between a pair of nodes is given by the difference of their potentials obtained by the Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition. The gradient flow runs from a node with higher potential to a node with lower potential; hence, the potential of a node shows its hierarchical position in a network. On the other hand, the circular flow component illuminates feedback loops built in a network. The potential values averaged over firms classified by the major industrial category describe hierarchical characteristics of sectors. The ordering of sectors according to the potential agrees well with the general idea of the supply chain. We also identify industrially integrated clusters of firms by applying a flow-based community detection method to the extracted circular flow network. We then find that each of the major communities is characterized by its main industry, forming a hierarchical supply chain with feedback loops by complementary industries such as transport and services.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuichi KICHIKAWA & Takashi IINO & Hiroshi IYETOMI & Hiroyasu INOUE, 2019. "Hierarchical and Circular Flow Structure of the Interfirm Transaction Network in Japan," Discussion papers 19063, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    • Handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:19063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/19e063.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianxi Luo & Carliss Y. Baldwin & Daniel E. Whitney & Christopher L. Magee, 2012. "The architecture of transaction networks: a comparative analysis of hierarchy in two sectors," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 21(6), pages 1307-1335, December.
    2. Tsutomu Watanabe & Iichiro Uesugi & Arito Ono (ed.), 2015. "The Economics of Interfirm Networks," Advances in Japanese Business and Economics, Springer, edition 127, number 978-4-431-55390-8, June.
    3. Slater, Paul B, 1977. "The Determination of Groups of Functionally Integrated Industries in the United States Using a 1967 Interindustry Flow Table," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-9.
    4. Elisa Letizia & Paolo Barucca & Fabrizio Lillo, 2018. "Resolution of ranking hierarchies in directed networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Giulio Cainelli & Sandro Montresor & Giuseppe Vittucci Marzetti, 2013. "Production and financial linkages in inter-firm networks: structural variety, risk-sharing and resilience," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Andreas Pyka & Esben Sloth Andersen (ed.), Long Term Economic Development, edition 127, pages 113-136, Springer.
    6. Elisa Letizia & Fabrizio Lillo, 2017. "Corporate payments networks and credit risk rating," Papers 1711.07677, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2018.
    7. Vestal, James E., 1995. "Planning for Change: Industrial Policy and Japanese Economic Development 1945-1990," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198290278.
    8. Abhijit Chakraborty & Yuichi Kichikawa & Takashi Iino & Hiroshi Iyetomi & Hiroyasu Inoue & Yoshi Fujiwara & Hideaki Aoyama, 2018. "Hierarchical communities in the walnut structure of the Japanese production network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, August.
    9. Vasco Carvalho, 2007. "Aggregate fluctuations and the network structure of intersectoral trade," Economics Working Papers 1206, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Oct 2010.
    10. Slater, P B, 1978. "The Network Structure of the United States Input-Output Table," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 49-70.
    11. Hayato Goto & Hideki Takayasu & Misako Takayasu, 2017. "Estimating risk propagation between interacting firms on inter-firm complex network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-12, October.
    12. Daron Acemoglu & Vasco M. Carvalho & Asuman Ozdaglar & Alireza Tahbaz‐Salehi, 2012. "The Network Origins of Aggregate Fluctuations," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 80(5), pages 1977-2016, September.
    13. Martha G. Alatriste Contreras & Giorgio Fagiolo, 2014. "Propagation of economic shocks in input-output networks: A cross-country analysis," Post-Print hal-01474258, HAL.
    14. McNerney, James & Fath, Brian D. & Silverberg, Gerald, 2013. "Network structure of inter-industry flows," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(24), pages 6427-6441.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yoshi Fujiwara & Hiroyasu Inoue & Takayuki Yamaguchi & Hideaki Aoyama & Takuma Tanaka, 2020. "Money flow network among firms' accounts in a regional bank of Japan," Papers 2007.14630, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joya, Omar & Rougier, Eric, 2019. "Do (all) sectoral shocks lead to aggregate volatility? Empirics from a production network perspective," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 77-107.
    2. Martha Alatriste-Contreras, 2015. "The relationship between the key sectors in the european union economy and the intra-European Union trade," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 4(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Yicheol Han & Stephan J Goetz, 2019. "Measuring network rewiring over time," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Theodore Tsekeris, 2017. "Network analysis of inter-sectoral relationships and key sectors in the Greek economy," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 12(2), pages 413-435, July.
    5. Nakano, Satoshi & Nishimura, Kazuhiko, 2018. "Structural propagation in a production network with restoring substitution elasticities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 986-999.
    6. Cantner, Uwe & Vannuccini, Simone, 2021. "Pervasive technologies and industrial linkages: Modeling acquired purposes," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 386-399.
    7. Hector Perez-Saiz & Mr. Jemma Dridi & Tunc Gursoy & Mounir Bari, 2019. "The Impact of Remittances on Economic Activity: The Importance of Sectoral Linkages," IMF Working Papers 2019/175, International Monetary Fund.
    8. Federica Cerina & Zhen Zhu & Alessandro Chessa & Massimo Riccaboni, 2015. "World Input-Output Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Emily P. Harvey & Dion R. J. O'Neale, 2019. "Using network science to quantify economic disruptions in regional input-output networks," Papers 1910.12498, arXiv.org.
    10. Chopra, Shauhrat S. & Khanna, Vikas, 2015. "Interconnectedness and interdependencies of critical infrastructures in the US economy: Implications for resilience," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 865-877.
    11. Xing, Lizhi & Dong, Xianlei & Guan, Jun, 2017. "Global industrial impact coefficient based on random walk process and inter-country input–output table," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 471(C), pages 576-591.
    12. Charles D. Brummitt & Kenan Huremović & Paolo Pin & Matthew H. Bonds & Fernando Vega-Redondo, 2017. "Contagious disruptions and complexity traps in economic development," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(9), pages 665-672, September.
    13. Vasco M. Carvalho & Nico Voigtländer, 2014. "Input Diffusion and the Evolution of Production Networks," NBER Working Papers 20025, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Michal FABINGER & Yoko SHIBUYA & TANIGUCHI Mina, 2017. "International Influences on Japanese Supply Chains," Discussion papers 17022, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    15. Bernard Herskovic & Bryan Kelly & Hanno Lustig & Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh, 2020. "Firm Volatility in Granular Networks," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(11), pages 4097-4162.
    16. Jennifer La'O & Alireza Tahbaz‐Salehi, 2022. "Optimal Monetary Policy in Production Networks," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(3), pages 1295-1336, May.
    17. Daisuke Sato & Yuichi Ikeda & Shuichi Kawai & Maxmilian Schich, 2020. "The sustainability and the survivability of Kyoto’s traditional craft industry revealed from supplier-customer network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, November.
    18. Giammetti, Raffaele, 2019. "Tariffs, Domestic Import Substitution and Trade Diversion in Input-Output Production Networks: how to deal with Brexit," MPRA Paper 93229, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Leiva-Leon, Danilo, 2013. "A New Approach to Infer Changes in the Synchronization of Business Cycle Phases," MPRA Paper 54452, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Kumar, Ashish & Chakrabarti, Anindya S. & Chakraborti, Anirban & Nandi, Tushar, 2021. "Distress propagation on production networks: Coarse-graining and modularity of linkages," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 568(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:19063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.