IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eps/ecmiwp/13150.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Derivatives Clearing and Brexit: A comment on the proposed EMIR revisions

Author

Listed:
  • Lannoo, Karel

Abstract

No less than three substantive pieces of EU legislation have been proposed over the eight-month period from November 2016 to June 2017, modifying or complementing the original EMIR Regulation of 2012. This contribution analyses the changes that have taken place in EU OTC derivatives markets since the new rules were adopted, and discusses the three drafts. It argues that the European Commission should have assessed risk management with CCPs in more detail and should have proposed a more integrated architecture for the supervision and resolution of CCPs. It further argues that the three proposals should have been part of one single package to facilitate the legislative process of such technical measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Lannoo, Karel, 2017. "Derivatives Clearing and Brexit: A comment on the proposed EMIR revisions," ECMI Papers 13150, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:eps:ecmiwp:13150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceps.eu/publications/derivatives-clearing-and-brexit-comment-proposed-emir-revisions
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elliott, David, 2013. "Financial Stability Paper No 20: Central counterparty loss-allocation rules," Bank of England Financial Stability Papers 20, Bank of England.
    2. Russell Barker & Andrew Dickinson & Alex Lipton & Rajeev Virmani, 2016. "Systemic Risks in CCP Networks," Papers 1604.00254, arXiv.org.
    3. Radoslav Raykov, 2016. "To Share or Not to Share? Uncovered Losses in a Derivatives Clearinghouse," Staff Working Papers 16-4, Bank of Canada.
    4. Robert Cox & Richard Heckinger & David A. Marshall, 2016. "Cleared Margin Setting at Selected Central Counterparties," Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, issue 4.
    5. Huertas, Thomas, 2016. "How to deal with the Resolution of Financial Market Infrastructures," CEPS Papers 11907, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lannoo, Karel & Thomadakis, Apostolos, 2020. "Derivatives in Sustainable Finance," ECMI Papers 29791, Centre for European Policy Studies.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Massimiliano Affinito & Matteo Piazza, 2021. "Always Look on the Bright Side? Central Counterparties and Interbank Markets during the Financial Crisis," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 17(1), pages 231-283, March.
    2. Wenqian Huang, 2019. "Central counterparty capitalization and misaligned incentives," BIS Working Papers 767, Bank for International Settlements.
    3. Boissel, Charles & Derrien, François & Ors, Evren & Thesmar, David, 2017. "Systemic risk in clearing houses: Evidence from the European repo market," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 511-536.
    4. Ms. Froukelien Wendt, 2015. "Central Counterparties: Addressing their Too Important to Fail Nature," IMF Working Papers 2015/021, International Monetary Fund.
    5. Lannoo, Karel & Thomadakis, Apostolos, 2020. "Derivatives in Sustainable Finance," ECMI Papers 29791, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    6. Darrell Duffie, 2014. "Financial Market Infrastructure: Too Important to Fail," Book Chapters, in: Martin Neil Baily & John B. Taylor (ed.), Across the Great Divide: New Perspectives on the Financial Crisis, chapter 11, Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
    7. Melinda Friesz & Kira Muratov-Szabó & Andrea Prepuk & Kata Váradi, 2021. "Risk Mutualization in Central Clearing: An Answer to the Cross-Guarantee Phenomenon from the Financial Stability Viewpoint," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Christian Kubitza & Loriana Pelizzon & Mila Getmansky Sherman, 2024. "Loss Sharing in Central Clearinghouses: Winners and Losers," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 237-273.
    9. Rehlon, Amandeep & Nixon, Dan, 2013. "Central counterparties: what are they, why do they matter and how does the Bank supervise them?," Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, vol. 53(2), pages 147-156.
    10. Gabrielle Demange & Thibaut Piquard, 2021. "On the market structure of central counterparties in the EU," Working Papers halshs-03107812, HAL.
    11. Alexander, Carol & Kaeck, Andreas & Sumawong, Anannit, 2019. "A parsimonious parametric model for generating margin requirements for futures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 31-43.
    12. H Peyton Young & Mark Paddrik, 2019. "How Safe are Central Counterparties in Credit Default Swap Markets?," Economics Series Working Papers 885, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    13. Vincent Bignon & Guillaume Vuillemey, 2020. "The Failure of a Clearinghouse: Empirical Evidence [Counterparty risk externality: centralized versus over-the-counter markets]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 24(1), pages 99-128.
    14. Paddrick, Mark & Young, H. Peyton, 2021. "How safe are central counterparties in credit default swap markets?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101170, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Kubitza, Christian & Pelizzon, Loriana & Getmansky, Mila, 2018. "The pitfalls of central clearing in the presence of systematic risk," ICIR Working Paper Series 31/18, Goethe University Frankfurt, International Center for Insurance Regulation (ICIR).
    16. Radoslav Raykov, 2016. "To Share or Not to Share? Uncovered Losses in a Derivatives Clearinghouse," Staff Working Papers 16-4, Bank of Canada.
    17. Demange, Gabrielle & Piquard, Thibaut, 2023. "On the choice of central counterparties in the EU," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    18. Huertas, Thomas F., 2021. "Reset required: The euro area crisis management and deposit insurance framework," SAFE White Paper Series 85, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    19. Francesco Palazzo, 2016. "Peer monitoring via loss mutualization," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1088, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    20. Andrew W Lo, 2016. "Moore's Law vs. Murphy's Law in the financial system: who's winning?," BIS Working Papers 564, Bank for International Settlements.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eps:ecmiwp:13150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Margarita Minkova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepssbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.