IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/euriss/19034.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

In defence of the household : Marx, gender and the utilitarian impasse

Author

Listed:
  • O'Laughlin, B.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • O'Laughlin, B., 1999. "In defence of the household : Marx, gender and the utilitarian impasse," ISS Working Papers - General Series 19034, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    • Handle: RePEc:ems:euriss:19034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/19034/wp289.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julie A. Nelson, 1995. "Feminism and Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 9(2), pages 131-148, Spring.
    2. Margo Russell, 1993. "Are Households Universal? On Misunderstanding Domestic Groups in Swaziland," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 24(4), pages 755-785, October.
    3. Diane L. Wolf, 1990. "Daughters, Decisions and Domination: An Empirical and Conceptual Critique of Household Strategies," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 21(1), pages 43-74, January.
    4. Molyneux, Maxine, 1981. "Women's emancipation under socialism: A model for the Third World?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 9(9-10), pages 1019-1037.
    5. Colin Murray, 1987. "Class, Gender and the Household: The Developmental Cycle in Southern Africa," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 18(2), pages 235-249, April.
    6. Moore, H., 1994. "Is There a Crisis in the Family?," Papers 3, United Nations - Research Institute of Social Development.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sylvia Chant, 1997. "Gender Aspects of Urban Economic Growth and Development," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-1997-137, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Stanley L. Brue, 1996. "Controversy and Change in the American Economics Curriculum," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 40(2), pages 44-51, October.
    3. Henrietta L. Moore, 1995. "The Future of Work," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 657-678, December.
    4. Solow, John L. & Kirkwood, Nicole, 2002. "Group identity and gender in public goods experiments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 403-412, August.
    5. Gillian Hewitson, 2001. "A Survey of Feminist Economics," Working Papers 2001.01, School of Economics, La Trobe University.
    6. Julie A. Nelson, 2012. "Is Dismissing the Precautionary Principle the Manly Thing to Do? Gender and the Economics of Climate Change," GDAE Working Papers 12-04, GDAE, Tufts University.
    7. Olena Hankivsk & Jane Friesen & Colleen Varcoe & Fiona MacPhail & Lorraine Greaves & Charmaine Spencer, 2004. "Expanding Economic Costing in Health Care: Values, Gender and Diversity," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 30(3), pages 257-282, September.
    8. Maria-Gabriella Baldarelli & Antonietta Cosentino & Mara Del Baldo & Angela Magistro, 2024. "Feminist Economics and Feminist Accounting in Dialogue: The Contribution to World Inequalities and Ecological Emergencies," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(6), pages 202-202, January.
    9. repec:dgr:rugsom:96c01 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Amy Trauger & Carolyn Sachs & Mary Barbercheck & Kathy Brasier & Nancy Kiernan, 2010. "“Our market is our community”: women farmers and civic agriculture in Pennsylvania, USA," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 27(1), pages 43-55, March.
    11. Wendy Olsen, 2007. "Structure, Agency, and Strategy Among Tenants in India," Economics Series Working Papers GPRG-WPS-080, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    12. Thomas J. Miceli & Alanson P. Minkler, 1997. "Preferences, cooperation, and Institutions," Working papers 1997-06, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    13. Eunice S. Han & Sarah F. Small, 2024. "Labor Market Experiences of US Veterans During COVID-19: Women’s Relative Advantage," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 50(3), pages 278-306, June.
    14. Leliveld, Andre, 1997. "The effects of restrictive South African migrant labor policy on the survival of rural households in Southern Africa: A sase study from rural Swaziland," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(11), pages 1839-1849, November.
    15. Giandomenica Becchio, 2018. "Gender, Feminist and Heterodox Economics: Interconnections and Differences in a Historical Perspective," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 1, pages 5-24, March.
    16. Lars Osberg, 2001. "Needs and Wants: What is Social Progress and How Should it be Measured," The Review of Economic Performance and Social Progress, in: Andrew Sharpe, Executive Director & France St-Hilaire, Vice-President , Research & Keith Banting, Di (ed.), The Review of Economic Performance and Social Progress 2001: The Longest Decade: Canada in the 1990s, volume 1, Centre for the Study of Living Standards;The Institutute for Research on Public Policy.
    17. Karin Astrid Siegmann & Myriam Blin, 2006. "The Best Of Two Worlds: Between-Method Triangulation In Feminist Economics Research," Working Papers 146, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK.
    18. Plaček, Michal & del Campo, Cristina & Valentinov, Vladislav & Vaceková, Gabriela & Šumpíková, Markéta & Ochrana, František, 2022. "Gender heterogeneity and politics in decision-making about green public procurement in the Czech Republic," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10(3), pages 239-250.
    19. Jackson, Cecile, 1996. "Rescuing gender from the poverty trap," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 489-504, March.
    20. Van Diermen, Peter, 1997. "Labor remuneration in Jakarta's small enterprises: Exploitative or equitable?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(12), pages 2129-2141, December.
    21. Brockington, Dan & Coast, Ernestina & Mdee, A & Howland, O & Randall, Sara, 2019. "Assets and domestic units: methodological challenges for longitudinal studies of poverty dynamics," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100877, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:euriss:19034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/issssnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.