IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureri/104083.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Resolving infeasibilities in railway timetabling instances

Author

Listed:
  • Polinder, G.-J.
  • Kroon, L.G.
  • Aardal, K.
  • Schmidt, M.E.
  • Molinaro, M.

Abstract

One of the key assumptions of timetabling algorithms is that a solution exists that meets the pre-specified constraints, like driving times, transfer constraints and headway constraints. If this assumption is satisfied, in most cases a timetable can be found rapidly. Nowadays, railways are being used more intensively, which leads to a higher utilization of the network. Due to this increased utilisation, capacity conflicts occur, so that no feasible solution to the timetabling models can be found, without making subtle but non-trivial changes to the initial input. Resolving these conflicts is essential for railway companies with high utilization of infrastructure. In this paper, we consider infeasible timetabling instances together with a list of allowed modifications of the constraints. We iteratively identify local conflicts in these instances and resolve them by adapting some of the constraints, until there are no more conflicts. The adaptations of the constraints are changes in the right-hand sides that we try to make as small as possible but that resolve the infeasibility. We empirically show that our method can be improved by enriching the initial minimal conflicts found with more constraints. In order to keep the problems tractable, an iterative procedure is used to find solutions to subproblems corresponding to conflicts in the complete timetabling instance. In a case study on instances from the Dutch railway network, we show that these instances can be made feasible within a few minutes.

Suggested Citation

  • Polinder, G.-J. & Kroon, L.G. & Aardal, K. & Schmidt, M.E. & Molinaro, M., 2018. "Resolving infeasibilities in railway timetabling instances," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2018-002-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureri:104083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/104083/ERS-2018-002-LIS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Liebchen & Mark Proksch & Frank H. Wagner, 2008. "Performance of Algorithms for Periodic Timetable Optimization," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Mark Hickman & Pitu Mirchandani & Stefan Voß (ed.), Computer-aided Systems in Public Transport, pages 151-180, Springer.
    2. Leo G. Kroon & Leon W. P. Peeters, 2003. "A Variable Trip Time Model for Cyclic Railway Timetabling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 198-212, May.
    3. Odijk, Michiel A., 1996. "A constraint generation algorithm for the construction of periodic railway timetables," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 455-464, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Polinder, Gert-Jaap & Schmidt, Marie & Huisman, Dennis, 2021. "Timetabling for strategic passenger railway planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 111-135.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yongxiang & Peng, Qiyuan & Yao, Yu & Zhang, Xin & Zhou, Xuesong, 2019. "Solving cyclic train timetabling problem through model reformulation: Extended time-space network construct and Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers methods," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 344-379.
    2. Rolf N. Van Lieshout, 2021. "Integrated Periodic Timetabling and Vehicle Circulation Scheduling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 768-790, May.
    3. Dennis Huisman & Leo G. Kroon & Ramon M. Lentink & Michiel J. C. M. Vromans, 2005. "Operations Research in passenger railway transportation," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 59(4), pages 467-497, November.
    4. Hartleb, Johann & Schmidt, Marie, 2022. "Railway timetabling with integrated passenger distribution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 953-966.
    5. Wenliang Zhou & Xiaorong You & Wenzhuang Fan, 2020. "A Mixed Integer Linear Programming Method for Simultaneous Multi-Periodic Train Timetabling and Routing on a High-Speed Rail Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-34, February.
    6. Burdett, R.L. & Kozan, E., 2010. "A disjunctive graph model and framework for constructing new train schedules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 85-98, January.
    7. Cacchiani, Valentina & Furini, Fabio & Kidd, Martin Philip, 2016. "Approaches to a real-world Train Timetabling Problem in a railway node," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 97-110.
    8. Sparing, Daniel & Goverde, Rob M.P., 2017. "A cycle time optimization model for generating stable periodic railway timetables," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 198-223.
    9. Yu-Jun Zheng, 2018. "Emergency Train Scheduling on Chinese High-Speed Railways," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 1077-1091, October.
    10. Christian Liebchen, 2008. "The First Optimized Railway Timetable in Practice," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 420-435, November.
    11. Zeyu Wang & Leishan Zhou & Bin Guo & Xing Chen & Hanxiao Zhou, 2021. "An Efficient Hybrid Approach for Scheduling the Train Timetable for the Longer Distance High-Speed Railway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, February.
    12. Kroon, L.G. & Peeters, L.W.P. & Wagenaar, J.C. & Zuidwijk, R.A., 2012. "Flexible Connections in PESP Models for Cyclic Passenger Railway Timetabling," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2012-008-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    13. Cordone, Roberto & Redaelli, Francesco, 2011. "Optimizing the demand captured by a railway system with a regular timetable," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 430-446, February.
    14. Leo G. Kroon & Leon W. P. Peeters & Joris C. Wagenaar & Rob A. Zuidwijk, 2014. "Flexible Connections in PESP Models for Cyclic Passenger Railway Timetabling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(1), pages 136-154, February.
    15. Cacchiani, Valentina & Toth, Paolo, 2012. "Nominal and robust train timetabling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 727-737.
    16. Pellegrini, Paola & Rodriguez, Joaquin, 2013. "Single European Sky and Single European Railway Area: A system level analysis of air and rail transportation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 64-86.
    17. Matthew E. H. Petering & Mojtaba Heydar & Dietrich R. Bergmann, 2016. "Mixed-Integer Programming for Railway Capacity Analysis and Cyclic, Combined Train Timetabling and Platforming," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 892-909, August.
    18. Zhou, Wenliang & Tian, Junli & Xue, Lijuan & Jiang, Min & Deng, Lianbo & Qin, Jin, 2017. "Multi-periodic train timetabling using a period-type-based Lagrangian relaxation decomposition," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 144-173.
    19. Zhang, Yongxiang & Peng, Qiyuan & Lu, Gongyuan & Zhong, Qingwei & Yan, Xu & Zhou, Xuesong, 2022. "Integrated line planning and train timetabling through price-based cross-resolution feedback mechanism," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 240-277.
    20. Tian, Xiaopeng & Niu, Huimin, 2020. "Optimization of demand-oriented train timetables under overtaking operations: A surrogate-dual-variable column generation for eliminating indivisibility," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 143-173.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    railway timetabling;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureri:104083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erimanl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.