IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureir/575.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modeling students' evealuation scores; comparing economics schools in Maastricht and Rotterdam

Author

Listed:
  • Franses, Ph.H.B.F.
  • Patoir, D.A.

Abstract

Each year the Dutch magazine Elsevier publishes the results of surveys amongst students concerning the perceived quality of academic studies. Unfortunately, the original survey data are not publicly available. We therefore repeat the survey for economics students in Maastricht and Rotterdam, as we wish to examine which attributes explain the overall evaluation and whether students in the two cities have different response styles. We find that the students in Rotterdam value the curriculum, while the Maastricht students value education, examination and organization of the school. We also find that a typical student in Maastricht is inclined to give a more positive evaluation than a similar student in Rotterdam. We discuss various implications of our findings

Suggested Citation

  • Franses, Ph.H.B.F. & Patoir, D.A., 2002. "Modeling students' evealuation scores; comparing economics schools in Maastricht and Rotterdam," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2002-12, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/575/feweco20020501101253.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Franses,Philip Hans & Paap,Richard, 2010. "Quantitative Models in Marketing Research," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521143653, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Risselada, Hans & Verhoef, Peter C. & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A., 2010. "Staying Power of Churn Prediction Models," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 198-208.
    2. Polo, Yolanda & Sese, F. Javier & Verhoef, Peter C., 2011. "The Effect of Pricing and Advertising on Customer Retention in a Liberalizing Market," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 201-214.
    3. Edwin Van Gameren & Michiel Ras & Evelien Eggink & Ingrid Ooms, 2005. "The demand for housing services in the Netherlands," ERSA conference papers ersa05p327, European Regional Science Association.
    4. Franses, Philip Hans, 2006. "Forecasting in Marketing," Handbook of Economic Forecasting, in: G. Elliott & C. Granger & A. Timmermann (ed.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 18, pages 983-1012, Elsevier.
    5. Clarijs, P. & Hogeling, B. & Franses, Ph.H.B.F. & Heij, C., 2007. "Evaluation of survey effects in pre-election polls," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2007-50, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    6. Sibdari, Soheil & Pyke, David F., 2010. "A competitive dynamic pricing model when demand is interdependent over time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 330-338, November.
    7. Romina Gambacorta & Maria Iannario, 2012. "Statistical models for measuring job satisfaction," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 852, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    8. Abdelfatah Ichou, 2010. "Modelling the Determinants of Job Creation: Microeconometric Models Accounting for Latent Entrepreneurial Ability," Scales Research Reports H201018, EIM Business and Policy Research.
    9. Richard Paap, 2002. "What are the advantages of MCMC based inference in latent variable models?," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 56(1), pages 2-22, February.
    10. Bioch, J.C. & Groenen, P.J.F. & Nalbantov, G.I., 2005. "Solving and interpreting binary classification problems in marketing with SVMs," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2005-46, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    11. Bas Donkers & Peter Verhoef & Martijn Jong, 2007. "Modeling CLV: A test of competing models in the insurance industry," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 163-190, June.
    12. Perez, G. Guirao & Fernandez, V. Cano & Yurda, M.I. Lopez & Donate, M.C. Rodriguez, 2002. "Socioeconomic Factors and the Consumption of Wine in Tenerife," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24798, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Lin, Kyle Y. & Sibdari, Soheil Y., 2009. "Dynamic price competition with discrete customer choices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(3), pages 969-980, September.
    14. Zhao, Li & Tian, Peng & Xiangyong Li, 2012. "Dynamic pricing in the presence of consumer inertia," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 137-148, April.
    15. Kremer, Sara T.M. & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A. & Leeflang, Peter S.H. & Wieringa, Jaap E., 2008. "Generalizations on the effectiveness of pharmaceutical promotional expenditures," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 234-246.
    16. Yabing Jiang & Hong Guo, 2015. "Design of Consumer Review Systems and Product Pricing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 714-730, December.
    17. Robert Kapłon, 2006. "A retrospective review of categorical data analysis – theory and marketing practice," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 16(1), pages 55-72.
    18. Mohamed Abdallah Ali & Mazhar Mughal & Charles Kodjo Mawusi, 2021. "Does Khat Consumption Affect Work Performance ? A Micro-Perspective from Djibouti," Working Papers hal-03375659, HAL.
    19. Christiaan Heij & Philip Hans Franses, 2011. "Correcting for survey effects in pre‐election polls," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 65(3), pages 352-370, August.
    20. Maruyama, Masayoshi & Flath, David & Minamikawa, Kazumitsu & Ohkita, Kenichi & Zennyo, Yusuke, 2015. "Platform selection by software developers: Theory and evidence," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 282-303.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feeurnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.