IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureir/12548.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A holding cost bound for the economic lot-sizing problem with time-invariant cost parameters

Author

Listed:
  • van den Heuvel, W.J.
  • Wagelmans, A.P.M.

Abstract

In this paper we derive a new structural property for an optimal solution of the economic lot-sizing problem with time-invariant cost parameters. We show that the total holding cost in an order interval of an optimal solution is bounded from above by a quantity proportional to the setup cost and the logarithm of the number of periods in the interval. Since we can also show that this bound is tight, this is in contrast to the optimality property of the economic order quantity (EOQ) model, where setup cost and holding cost are perfectly balanced. Furthermore, we show that this property can be used for the design of a new heuristic and that the result may be useful in worst case analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • van den Heuvel, W.J. & Wagelmans, A.P.M., 2008. "A holding cost bound for the economic lot-sizing problem with time-invariant cost parameters," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2008-10, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:12548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/12548/ei2008-10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilco Van den Heuvel & Albert P. M. Wagelmans, 2010. "Worst-Case Analysis for a General Class of Online Lot-Sizing Heuristics," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 59-67, February.
    2. Sven Axsäter, 1985. "Note---Performance Bounds for Lot Sizing Heuristics," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(5), pages 634-640, May.
    3. Albert Wagelmans & Stan van Hoesel & Antoon Kolen, 1992. "Economic Lot Sizing: An O(n log n) Algorithm That Runs in Linear Time in the Wagner-Whitin Case," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(1-supplem), pages 145-156, February.
    4. Harvey M. Wagner & Thomson M. Whitin, 1958. "Dynamic Version of the Economic Lot Size Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 89-96, October.
    5. Axsater, Sven, 1982. "Worst case performance for lot sizing heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 339-343, April.
    6. Hoesel, C. P. M. Van & Wagelmans, A. P. M., 2000. "Parametric analysis of setup cost in the economic lot-sizing model without speculative motives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 13-22, June.
    7. Awi Federgruen & Michal Tzur, 1991. "A Simple Forward Algorithm to Solve General Dynamic Lot Sizing Models with n Periods in 0(n log n) or 0(n) Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(8), pages 909-925, August.
    8. Alok Aggarwal & James K. Park, 1993. "Improved Algorithms for Economic Lot Size Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 549-571, June.
    9. Gabriel R. Bitran & Thomas L. Magnanti & Horacio H. Yanasse, 1984. "Approximation Methods for the Uncapacitated Dynamic Lot Size Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1121-1140, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wilco Van den Heuvel & Albert P. M. Wagelmans, 2010. "Worst-Case Analysis for a General Class of Online Lot-Sizing Heuristics," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 59-67, February.
    2. Hark-Chin Hwang & Wilco van den Heuvel & Albert P. M. Wagelmans, 2023. "Multilevel Lot-Sizing with Inventory Bounds," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(6), pages 1470-1490, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van den Heuvel, Wilco & Wagelmans, Albert P.M., 2006. "A polynomial time algorithm for a deterministic joint pricing and inventory model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 463-480, April.
    2. Massonnet, G. & Gayon, J.-P. & Rapine, C., 2014. "Approximation algorithms for deterministic continuous-review inventory lot-sizing problems with time-varying demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 641-649.
    3. Chung-Yee Lee & Sila Çetinkaya & Albert P. M. Wagelmans, 2001. "A Dynamic Lot-Sizing Model with Demand Time Windows," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(10), pages 1384-1395, October.
    4. Siao-Leu Phouratsamay & Safia Kedad-Sidhoum & Fanny Pascual, 2021. "Coordination of a two-level supply chain with contracts," 4OR, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 235-264, June.
    5. Wolosewicz, Cathy & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Aggoune, Riad, 2015. "A Lagrangian heuristic for an integrated lot-sizing and fixed scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 3-12.
    6. Stan van Hoesel & H. Edwin Romeijn & Dolores Romero Morales & Albert P. M. Wagelmans, 2005. "Integrated Lot Sizing in Serial Supply Chains with Production Capacities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(11), pages 1706-1719, November.
    7. Hark‐Chin Hwang & Wilco van den Heuvel, 2012. "Improved algorithms for a lot‐sizing problem with inventory bounds and backlogging," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(3‐4), pages 244-253, April.
    8. Martel, Alain & Gascon, Andre, 1998. "Dynamic lot-sizing with price changes and price-dependent holding costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 114-128, November.
    9. Nadjib Brahimi & Stéphane Dauzère-Pérès & Najib M. Najid, 2006. "Capacitated Multi-Item Lot-Sizing Problems with Time Windows," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(5), pages 951-967, October.
    10. Yongpei Guan, 2011. "Stochastic lot-sizing with backlogging: computational complexity analysis," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 651-678, April.
    11. Romeijn, H.E. & van den Heuvel, W.J. & Geunes, J., 2012. "Mitigating the Cost of Anarchy in Supply Chain Systems," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2012-03, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    12. Heuvel, Wilco van den & Borm, Peter & Hamers, Herbert, 2007. "Economic lot-sizing games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 1117-1130, January.
    13. Chung-Yee Lee & Sila Çetinkaya & Wikrom Jaruphongsa, 2003. "A Dynamic Model for Inventory Lot Sizing and Outbound Shipment Scheduling at a Third-Party Warehouse," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 735-747, October.
    14. Hark-Chin Hwang, 2010. "Economic Lot-Sizing for Integrated Production and Transportation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 428-444, April.
    15. Chung-Lun Li & Qingying Li, 2016. "Polynomial-Time Solvability of Dynamic Lot Size Problems," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(03), pages 1-20, June.
    16. Hark-Chin Hwang & Hyun-Soo Ahn & Philip Kaminsky, 2013. "Basis Paths and a Polynomial Algorithm for the Multistage Production-Capacitated Lot-Sizing Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(2), pages 469-482, April.
    17. Hark-Chin Hwang, 2009. "Inventory Replenishment and Inbound Shipment Scheduling Under a Minimum Replenishment Policy," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 244-264, May.
    18. Hwang, Hark-Chin & Kang, Jangha, 2020. "The two-level lot-sizing problem with outbound shipment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    19. Fink, Jiří & Hurink, Johann L., 2015. "Minimizing costs is easier than minimizing peaks when supplying the heat demand of a group of houses," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 644-650.
    20. Chung-Yee Lee & Sila Çetinkaya & Albert P.M. Wagelmans, 1999. "A Dynamic Lot-Sizing Model with Demand Time Windows," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 99-095/4, Tinbergen Institute.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:12548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feeurnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.