IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/81850.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A general 3-step maximum likelihood approach to estimate the effects of multiple latent categorical variables on a distal outcome

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu, Yajing
  • Steele, Fiona
  • Moustaki, Irini

Abstract

The 3-step approach has been recently advocated over the simultaneous 1-step approach to model a distal outcome predicted by a latent categorical variable. We generalize the 3-step approach to situations where the distal outcome is predicted by multiple and possibly associated latent categorical variables. Although the simultaneous 1-step approach has been criticized, simulation studies have found that the performance of the two approaches is similar in most situations (Bakk & Vermunt, 2016). This is consistent with our findings for a 2-LV extension when all model assumptions are satisfied. Results also indicate that under various degrees of violation of the normality and conditional independence assumption for the distal outcome and indicators, both approaches are subject to bias but the 3-step approach is less sensitive. The differences in estimates using the two approaches are illustrated in an analysis of the effects of various childhood socioeconomic circumstances on body mass index at age 50.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu, Yajing & Steele, Fiona & Moustaki, Irini, 2017. "A general 3-step maximum likelihood approach to estimate the effects of multiple latent categorical variables on a distal outcome," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 81850, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:81850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/81850/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bakk, Zsuzsa & Oberski, Daniel L. & Vermunt, Jeroen K., 2014. "Relating Latent Class Assignments to External Variables: Standard Errors for Correct Inference," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(4), pages 520-540.
    2. Vermunt, Jeroen K., 2010. "Latent Class Modeling with Covariates: Two Improved Three-Step Approaches," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 450-469.
    3. Bolck, Annabel & Croon, Marcel & Hagenaars, Jacques, 2004. "Estimating Latent Structure Models with Categorical Variables: One-Step Versus Three-Step Estimators," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 3-27, January.
    4. Schoon, Ingrid & Sacker, Amanda & Bartley, Mel, 2003. "Socio-economic adversity and psychosocial adjustment: a developmental-contextual perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 1001-1015, September.
    5. Tarani Chandola & Paul Clarke & J. N. Morris & David Blane, 2006. "Pathways between education and health: a causal modelling approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(2), pages 337-359, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhu, Yajing & Steele, Fiona & Moustaki, Irini, 2020. "A multilevel structural equation model for the interrelationships between multiple latent dimensions of childhood socio‐economic circumstances, partnership transitions and mid‐life health," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103104, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Yajing Zhu & Fiona Steele & Irini Moustaki, 2020. "A multilevel structural equation model for the interrelationships between multiple latent dimensions of childhood socio‐economic circumstances, partnership transitions and mid‐life health," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 1029-1050, June.
    3. Bakk, Zsuzsa & Kuha, Jouni, 2020. "Relating latent class membership to external variables: an overview," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107564, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Ruoxuan Li & Meilin Yao & Hongrui Liu & Yunxiang Chen, 2020. "Chinese Parental Involvement and Adolescent Learning Motivation and Subjective Well-Being: More is not Always Better," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(7), pages 2527-2555, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zsuzsa Bakk & Jouni Kuha, 2018. "Two-Step Estimation of Models Between Latent Classes and External Variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(4), pages 871-892, December.
    2. Bakk, Zsuzsa & Kuha, Jouni, 2020. "Relating latent class membership to external variables: an overview," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107564, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Bakk, Zsuzsa & Kuha, Jouni, 2018. "Two-step estimation of models between latent classes and external variables," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 85161, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Yajing Zhu & Fiona Steele & Irini Moustaki, 2020. "A multilevel structural equation model for the interrelationships between multiple latent dimensions of childhood socio‐economic circumstances, partnership transitions and mid‐life health," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 1029-1050, June.
    5. Lekkas, Peter & Howard, Natasha J & Stankov, Ivana & daniel, mark & Paquet, Catherine, 2019. "A Longitudinal Typology of Neighbourhood-level Social Fragmentation: A Finite Mixture Model Approach," SocArXiv 56x9c, Center for Open Science.
    6. Francis,David C. & Karalashvili,Nona & Murrell,Peter, 2022. "Transactional Governance Structures : New Cross-Country Data and an Application tothe Effect of Uncertainty," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10118, The World Bank.
    7. Zhu, Yajing & Steele, Fiona & Moustaki, Irini, 2020. "A multilevel structural equation model for the interrelationships between multiple latent dimensions of childhood socio‐economic circumstances, partnership transitions and mid‐life health," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103104, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Mitchell George E., 2024. "Three Models of US State-Level Charity Regulation," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.
    9. Gil, J.M. & Diaz-Montenegro, J. & Varela, E., 2018. "A Bias-Adjusted Three-Step approach for analysing the livelihood strategies and the asset mix of cacao producers in Ecuador," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277215, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Jennifer Oser & Marc Hooghe & Zsuzsa Bakk & Roberto Mari, 2023. "Changing citizenship norms among adolescents, 1999-2009-2016: A two-step latent class approach with measurement equivalence testing," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4915-4933, October.
    11. Lecegui, Antonio & Olaizola, Ana María & López-i-Gelats, Feliu & Varela, Elsa, 2022. "Implementing the livelihood resilience framework: An indicator-based model for assessing mountain pastoral farming systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    12. Aely Park & Youngmi Kim & Jennifer Murphy, 2023. "Adverse Childhood Experiences and Substance Use Among Korean College Students: Different by Gender?," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(4), pages 1811-1825, August.
    13. Gugerty, Mary Kay & Mitchell, George E. & Santamarina, Francisco J., 2021. "Discourses of evaluation: Institutional logics and organizational practices among international development agencies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    14. Paweł A. Atroszko & Bartosz Atroszko & Edyta Charzyńska, 2021. "Subpopulations of Addictive Behaviors in Different Sample Types and Their Relationships with Gender, Personality, and Well-Being: Latent Profile vs. Latent Class Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-29, August.
    15. Konte M., 2014. "Do remittances not promote growth? : a bias-adjusted three-step mixture-of-regressions," MERIT Working Papers 2014-075, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    16. F. J. Clouth & S. Pauws & F. Mols & J. K. Vermunt, 2022. "A new three-step method for using inverse propensity weighting with latent class analysis," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 16(2), pages 351-371, June.
    17. Aurélie Bertrand & Christian Hafner, 2014. "On heterogeneous latent class models with applications to the analysis of rating scores," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 307-330, February.
    18. Lucy Prior, 2021. "Allostatic Load and Exposure Histories of Disadvantage," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Martin Lukac & Nadja Doerflinger & Valeria Pulignano, 2019. "Developing a Cross-National Comparative Framework for Studying Labour Market Segmentation: Measurement Equivalence with Latent Class Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 233-255, August.
    20. Jason V. Chen & Kurt H. Gee & Jed J. Neilson, 2021. "Disclosure Prominence and the Quality of Non‐GAAP Earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 163-213, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    latent class analysis; multiple latent variables; robustness; 3-step approach;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:81850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.