IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/develp/v59y2016i1d10.1057_s41301-017-0097-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Common but Differentiated Responsibilities: Which Way Forward?

Author

Listed:
  • Mariama Williams
  • Manuel F. Montes

Abstract

The principle of common but differentiated responsibility (CBDR) has been based on the international community’s recognition of historical responsibilities and the principles of fairness and solidarity. It has been argued that the newly fashionable notion of universality overturns the principle. On the contrary, universality and common responsibility would be impossible in practice without responsibilities being differentiated because of disparities in capabilities, including those that are historically rooted, among human communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariama Williams & Manuel F. Montes, 2016. "Common but Differentiated Responsibilities: Which Way Forward?," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 59(1), pages 114-120, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:develp:v:59:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1057_s41301-017-0097-6
    DOI: 10.1057/s41301-017-0097-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41301-017-0097-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41301-017-0097-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mbeva, Kennedy Liti & Pauw, Pieter, 2016. "Self-differentiation of countries’ responsibilities: addressing climate change through intended nationally determined contributions," IDOS Discussion Papers 4/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. Robert Reinstein, 2004. "A Possible Way Forward on Climate Change," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 245-309, July.
    3. Paul G. Harris & Jonathan Symons, 2013. "Norm Conflict in Climate Governance: Greenhouse Gas Accounting and the Problem of Consumption," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 13(1), pages 9-29, February.
    4. Pauw, Pieter & Brandi, Clara & Richerzhagen, Carmen & Bauer, Steffen & Schmole, Hanna, 2014. "Different perspectives on differentiated responsibilities: a state-of-the-art review of the notion of common but differentiated responsibilities in international negotiations," IDOS Discussion Papers 6/2014, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mbeva, Kennedy Liti & Pauw, Pieter, 2016. "Self-differentiation of countries’ responsibilities: addressing climate change through intended nationally determined contributions," IDOS Discussion Papers 4/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. Pieter Pauw & Kennedy Mbeva & Harro Asselt, 2019. "Subtle differentiation of countries’ responsibilities under the Paris Agreement," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, December.
    3. Daniel Moran & Richard Wood, 2014. "Convergence Between The Eora, Wiod, Exiobase, And Openeu'S Consumption-Based Carbon Accounts," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 245-261, September.
    4. Mysiak, Jaroslav & Surminski, Swenja & Thieken, Annegret & Mechler, Reinhard & Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H., 2016. "Brief communication: Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction – success or warning sign for Paris?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68267, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Cahill-Webb, Finn, 2018. "International environmental governance and the Paris agreement on climate change: The adoption of the "pledge and review" governance approach," IPE Working Papers 99/2018, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    6. Carlo Carraro & Barbara Buchner, 2006. "Parallel Climate Blocs. Incentives to cooperation in international climate negotiations," Working Papers 2006_45, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    7. Carraro, Carlo & Buchner, Barbara, 2005. "Regional and Sub-Global Climate Blocs. A Game-Theoretic Perspective on Bottom-up Climate Regimes," CEPR Discussion Papers 5034, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Andries Hof & Michel Elzen & Detlef Vuuren, 2009. "Environmental effectiveness and economic consequences of fragmented versus universal regimes: what can we learn from model studies?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 39-62, February.
    9. Harald Winkler & Niklas Höhne & Guy Cunliffe & Takeshi Kuramochi & Amanda April & Maria Jose Villafranca Casas, 2018. "Countries start to explain how their climate contributions are fair: more rigour needed," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 99-115, February.
    10. Paul G. Harris & Taedong Lee, 2017. "Compliance with climate change agreements: the constraints of consumption," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 779-794, December.
    11. Roberts, J. Timmons & Huq, Saleemul & Durand, Alexis & Hoffmeister, Victoria & Gewirtzman, Jonathan & Natson, Sujay & Weikmans, Romain, 2016. "Financing options for loss and damage: a review and roadmap," IDOS Discussion Papers 21/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    12. Zander, Rauno, 2016. "Risks and opportunities of non-bank based financing for agriculture: the case of agricultural value chain financing," IDOS Discussion Papers 7/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    13. Steven R. Brechin & Maria I. Espinoza, 2017. "A case for further refinement of the Green Climate Fund’s 50:50 ratio climate change mitigation and adaptation allocation framework: toward a more targeted approach," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 311-320, June.
    14. Alexander Thompson, 2020. "Emerging Powers and Differentiation in Global Climate Institutions," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 61-72, October.
    15. Balsiger, Jörg & Prys, Miriam & Steinhoff, Niko, 2012. "The Nature and Role of Regional Agreements in International Environmental Politics: Mapping Agreements, Outlining Future Research," GIGA Working Papers 208, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    16. Scarlato, Margherita & D'Agostino, Giorgio, 2016. "The political economy of cash transfers: a comparative analysis of Latin American and sub-Saharan African experiences," IDOS Discussion Papers 6/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    17. MacFeely Steve, 2017. "Measuring the Sustainable Development Goals: What does it mean for Ireland?," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 65(4), pages 41-71, December.
    18. Klingebiel, Stephan, 2017. "Rising powers and the provision of transnational public goods: conceptual considerations and features of South Africa as a case study," IDOS Discussion Papers 3/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    19. Jingwen Huo & Jing Meng & Heran Zheng & Priti Parikh & Dabo Guan, 2023. "Achieving decent living standards in emerging economies challenges national mitigation goals for CO2 emissions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Tobias Nielsen & Nicolai Baumert & Astrid Kander & Magnus Jiborn & Viktoras Kulionis, 2021. "The risk of carbon leakage in global climate agreements," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 147-163, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:develp:v:59:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1057_s41301-017-0097-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.