IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/57213.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stability of the exponential utility maximization problem with respect to preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Xing, Hao

Abstract

This paper studies stability of the exponential utility maximization when there are small variations on agent's utility function. Two settings are considered. First, in a general semi-martingale model where random endowments are present, a sequence of utilities depned on R converges to the exponential utility. Under a uniform condition on their marginal utilities, convergence of value functions, optimal payouts and optimal investment strategies are obtained, their rate of con-vergence are also determined. Stability of utility-based pricing is studied as an application. Second, a sequence of utilities depened on R+ converges to the exponential utility after shifting and scaling. Their associated optimal strategies, after appropriate scaling, converge to the optimal strategy for the exponential hedging problem. This complements Theorem 3.2 in M. Nutz, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields, 152, 2012, which establishes the convergence for a sequence of power utilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Xing, Hao, 2017. "Stability of the exponential utility maximization problem with respect to preferences," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57213, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:57213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/57213/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcel Nutz, 2009. "The Opportunity Process for Optimal Consumption and Investment with Power Utility," Papers 0912.1879, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2010.
    2. Sara Biagini & Marco Frittelli, 2005. "Utility maximization in incomplete markets for unbounded processes," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 493-517, October.
    3. Kasper Larsen & Gordan Zitkovic, 2007. "Stability of utility-maximization in incomplete markets," Papers 0706.0474, arXiv.org.
    4. Paolo Guasoni & Scott Robertson, 2012. "Portfolios and risk premia for the long run," Papers 1203.1399, arXiv.org.
    5. Yuri M. Kabanov & Christophe Stricker, 2002. "On the optimal portfolio for the exponential utility maximization: remarks to the six‐author paper," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 125-134, April.
    6. Sara Biagini & Marco Frittelli, 2007. "The supermartingale property of the optimal wealth process for general semimartingales," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 253-266, April.
    7. Larsen, Kasper & Zitkovic, Gordan, 2007. "Stability of utility-maximization in incomplete markets," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 117(11), pages 1642-1662, November.
    8. Elyès Jouini & Clotilde Napp, 2004. "Convergence of utility functions and convergence of optimal strategies," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 133-144, January.
    9. Bayraktar, Erhan & Kravitz, Ross, 2013. "Stability of exponential utility maximization with respect to market perturbations," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 123(5), pages 1671-1690.
    10. Mark P. Owen & Gordan Žitković, 2009. "Optimal Investment With An Unbounded Random Endowment And Utility‐Based Pricing," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 129-159, January.
    11. M. Musiela & T. Zariphopoulou, 2009. "Portfolio choice under dynamic investment performance criteria," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 161-170.
    12. Freddy Delbaen & Peter Grandits & Thorsten Rheinländer & Dominick Samperi & Martin Schweizer & Christophe Stricker, 2002. "Exponential Hedging and Entropic Penalties," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 99-123, April.
    13. Kasper Larsen, 2009. "Continuity Of Utility‐Maximization With Respect To Preferences," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 237-250, April.
    14. repec:dau:papers:123456789/355 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lingqi Gu & Yiqing Lin & Junjian Yang, 2017. "Utility maximization problem under transaction costs: optimal dual processes and stability," Papers 1710.04363, arXiv.org.
    2. Korotkov, Vladimir & Wu, Desheng, 2021. "Benchmarking project portfolios using optimality thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hao Xing, 2012. "Stability of the exponential utility maximization problem with respect to preferences," Papers 1205.6160, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2013.
    2. Kim Weston, 2016. "Stability of utility maximization in nonequivalent markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 511-541, April.
    3. Kim Weston, 2014. "Stability of Utility Maximization in Nonequivalent Markets," Papers 1410.0915, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2015.
    4. Gordan Žitković, 2012. "An example of a stochastic equilibrium with incomplete markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 177-206, April.
    5. Martin Herdegen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2018. "Stability of Radner equilibria with respect to small frictions," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 443-502, April.
    6. Lingqi Gu & Yiqing Lin & Junjian Yang, 2017. "Utility maximization problem under transaction costs: optimal dual processes and stability," Papers 1710.04363, arXiv.org.
    7. Markus Mocha & Nicholas Westray, 2011. "The Stability of the Constrained Utility Maximization Problem - A BSDE Approach," Papers 1107.0190, arXiv.org.
    8. Pietro Siorpaes, 2015. "Optimal investment and price dependence in a semi-static market," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 161-187, January.
    9. Horst, Ulrich & Hu, Ying & Imkeller, Peter & Réveillac, Anthony & Zhang, Jianing, 2014. "Forward–backward systems for expected utility maximization," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 124(5), pages 1813-1848.
    10. Michail Anthropelos & Gordan Zitkovic, 2009. "Partial Equilibria with Convex Capital Requirements: Existence, Uniqueness and Stability," Papers 0901.3318, arXiv.org.
    11. Gu, Lingqi & Lin, Yiqing & Yang, Junjian, 2016. "On the dual problem of utility maximization in incomplete markets," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 126(4), pages 1019-1035.
    12. Michail Anthropelos & Gordan Žitković, 2010. "Partial equilibria with convex capital requirements: existence, uniqueness and stability," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 107-135, January.
    13. Johannes Gerer & Gregor Dorfleitner, 2016. "A Note On Utility Indifference Pricing," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(06), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Gordan Zitkovic, 2009. "An example of a stochastic equilibrium with incomplete markets," Papers 0906.0208, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2010.
    15. Bayraktar, Erhan & Kravitz, Ross, 2013. "Stability of exponential utility maximization with respect to market perturbations," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 123(5), pages 1671-1690.
    16. Kasper Larsen & Halil Mete Soner & Gordan Žitković, 2020. "Conditional Davis pricing," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 565-599, July.
    17. Mark P. Owen & Gordan Žitković, 2009. "Optimal Investment With An Unbounded Random Endowment And Utility‐Based Pricing," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 129-159, January.
    18. Kasper Larsen & Hang Yu, 2012. "Horizon dependence of utility optimizers in incomplete models," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 779-801, October.
    19. Pietro Siorpaes, 2013. "Optimal investment and price dependence in a semi-static market," Papers 1303.0237, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2013.
    20. Michail Anthropelos & Scott Robertson & Konstantinos Spiliopoulos, 2018. "Optimal Investment, Demand and Arbitrage under Price Impact," Papers 1804.09151, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2018.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General
    • F3 - International Economics - - International Finance
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:57213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.