IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/119908.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Longitudinal analysis of exchanges of support between parents and children in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Steele, Fiona
  • Zhang, Siliang
  • Grundy, Emily
  • Burchardt, Tania

Abstract

We consider how exchanges of support between parents and adult children vary by demographic and socio-economic characteristics and examine evidence for reciprocity in transfers and substitution between practical and financial support. Using data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study 2011–19, repeated measures of help given and received are analysed jointly using multivariate random effects probit models. Exchanges are considered from both a child and parent perspective. In the latter case, we propose a novel approach to account for the correlation between mother and father reports and develop an efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm suitable for large datasets with multiple outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Steele, Fiona & Zhang, Siliang & Grundy, Emily & Burchardt, Tania, 2024. "Longitudinal analysis of exchanges of support between parents and children in the UK," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119908, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:119908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/119908/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valeria Bordone & Helga A. G. Valk, 2016. "Intergenerational support among migrant families in Europe," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 259-270, September.
    2. Emily E. Wiemers & Suzanne M. Bianchi, 2015. "Competing Demands from Aging Parents and Adult Children in Two Cohorts of American Women," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 41(1), pages 127-146, March.
    3. Tak Wing Chan & John Ermisch, 2015. "Residential proximity of parents and their adult offspring in the United Kingdom, 2009-10," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(3), pages 355-372, November.
    4. John C. Henretta & Matthew F. Voorhis & Beth J. Soldo, 2018. "Cohort Differences in Parental Financial Help to Adult Children," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(4), pages 1567-1582, August.
    5. Emily Grundy & Sanna Read, 2012. "Social Contacts and Receipt of Help Among Older People in England: Are There Benefits of Having More Children?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 67(6), pages 742-754.
    6. Eric Bonsang, 2007. "How do middle-aged children allocate time and money transfers to their older parents in Europe?," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 34(2), pages 171-188, April.
    7. Hajivassiliou, Vassilis & McFadden, Daniel & Ruud, Paul, 1996. "Simulation of multivariate normal rectangle probabilities and their derivatives theoretical and computational results," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1-2), pages 85-134.
    8. Merril Silverstein & Stephen J. Conroy & Haitao Wang & Roseann Giarrusso & Vern L. Bengtson, 2002. "Reciprocity in Parent–Child Relations Over the Adult Life Course," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 57(1), pages 3-13.
    9. Steele, Fiona & Clarke, Paul & Kuha, Jouni, 2019. "Modeling within-household associations in household panel studies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 88162, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Fiona Steele & Emily Grundy, 2021. "Random effects dynamic panel models for unequally spaced multivariate categorical repeated measures: an application to child–parent exchanges of support," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 3-23, January.
    11. Leen Heylen & Dimitri Mortelmans & Maarten Hermans & Kim Boudiny, 2012. "The intermediate effect of geographic proximity on intergenerational support," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 27(17), pages 455-486.
    12. Matthijs Kalmijn, 2019. "The Effects of Ageing on Intergenerational Support Exchange: A New Look at the Hypothesis of Flow Reversal," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 35(2), pages 263-284, May.
    13. Matthijs Kalmijn, 2016. "Children’s Divorce and Parent–Child Contact: A Within-Family Analysis of Older European Parents," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 71(2), pages 332-343.
    14. Kyungmin Kim & Steven H. Zarit & David J. Eggebeen & Kira S. Birditt & Karen L. Fingerman, 2011. "Discrepancies in Reports of Support Exchanges Between Aging Parents and Their Middle-Aged Children," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 66(5), pages 527-537.
    15. James R. Bland & Amanda C. Cook, 2019. "Random effects probit and logit: understanding predictions and marginal effects," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 116-123, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuha, Jouni & Zhang, Siliang & Steele, Fiona, 2023. "Latent variable models for multivariate dyadic data with zero inflation: analysis of intergenerational exchanges of family support," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116006, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Diederich, Freya & König, Hans-Helmut & Brettschneider, Christian, 2021. "A longitudinal perspective on inter vivos transfers between children and their parents in need of long-term care," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    3. Adriana M. Reyes, 2022. "Race and Ethnic Differences in Financial Dependency of Coresident Young Adults During Economic Recessions and Over Time," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 51-65, March.
    4. Steele, Fiona & Grundy, Emily, 2021. "Random effects dynamic panel models for unequally-spaced multivariate categorical repeated measures: an application to child-parent exchanges of support," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106255, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Fiona Steele & Emily Grundy, 2021. "Random effects dynamic panel models for unequally spaced multivariate categorical repeated measures: an application to child–parent exchanges of support," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 3-23, January.
    6. Linda Kridahl & Ann-Zofie Duvander, 2021. "Are Mothers and Daughters Most Important? How Gender, Childhood Family Dissolution and Parents’ Current Living Arrangements Affect the Personal Care of Parents," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Eliza Lai-Yi Wong & Jennifer Mengwei Liao & Christopher Etherton-Beer & Loretta Baldassar & Gary Cheung & Claire Margaret Dale & Elisabeth Flo & Bettina Sandgathe Husebø & Roy Lay-Yee & Adele Millard , 2020. "Scoping Review: Intergenerational Resource Transfer and Possible Enabling Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-22, October.
    8. Michael King, 2012. "The Unbanked Four-Fifths: Informality and Barriers to Financial Services in Nigeria," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp411, IIIS.
    9. Paleti, Rajesh, 2018. "Generalized multinomial probit Model: Accommodating constrained random parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 248-262.
    10. Yannis M. Ioannides & Vassilis A. Hajivassiliou, 2007. "Unemployment and liquidity constraints," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 479-510.
    11. Marissa M Rurka & J Jill Suitor & Megan Gilligan & Robert T Frase & Zhen Cong, 2023. "How Do Own and Siblings’ Genders Shape Caregivers’ Risk of Perceiving Care-Related Criticism From Siblings?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(3), pages 520-531.
    12. Jyoti Savla & Steven H Zarit & David M Almeida, 2018. "Routine Support to Parents and Stressors in Everyday Domains: Associations With Negative Affect and Cortisol," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(3), pages 437-446.
    13. Haaijer, Marinus E., 1996. "Predictions in conjoint choice experiments : the x-factor probit model," Research Report 96B22, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    14. Jaehwan Kim & Greg M. Allenby & Peter E. Rossi, 2002. "Modeling Consumer Demand for Variety," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 229-250, December.
    15. Park, Cheolsung & Kang, Changhui, 2008. "Does education induce healthy lifestyle?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 1516-1531, December.
    16. de Palma, Andre & Kilani, Karim, 2007. "Invariance of conditional maximum utility," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 137-146, January.
    17. Penelope A. Smith & Peter M. Summers, 2005. "How well do Markov switching models describe actual business cycles? The case of synchronization," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(2), pages 253-274.
    18. Ziegler, Andreas, 2002. "Simulated Classical Tests in the Multiperiod Multinomial Probit Model," ZEW Discussion Papers 02-38, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    19. Klaus Moeltner & David F. Layton, 2002. "A Censored Random Coefficients Model For Pooled Survey Data With Application To The Estimation Of Power Outage Costs," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 84(3), pages 552-561, August.
    20. Kajal Lahiri & Chuanming Gao & Bernard Wixon, 2020. "Value of Sample Separation Information in a Sequential Probit Model," Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, , vol. 19(2), pages 151-176, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    intergenerational exchanges; longitudinal dyadic data; reciprocity; multivariate random effects probit model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:119908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.