IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/119423.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Scarcity and predictability of income over time: experimental games as a way to study consumption smoothing

Author

Listed:
  • Kappes, Heather Barry
  • Campbell, Rebecca
  • Ivchenko, Andriy

Abstract

Consumer research typically examines discrete financial decisions. These measures are uninformative about behavior over time, like consumption smoothing, the extent to which people spend consistently across periods of high and low income. We developed a multiround game to study consumption smoothing and tested hypotheses about initial resource scarcity and the predictability of income. The game was played by museum visitors across a wide age range (6–80+, N=2,104) and by online participants (N=1,294) in a preregistered partial replication. Participants spent their money in the game more smoothly over the multiple rounds when they had abundant rather than scarce initial resources, and this was particularly true when they received income on a predictable schedule. When income was unpredictable, initial scarcity did not hurt performance. We discuss implications for theorizing about the effects of scarcity.

Suggested Citation

  • Kappes, Heather Barry & Campbell, Rebecca & Ivchenko, Andriy, 2023. "Scarcity and predictability of income over time: experimental games as a way to study consumption smoothing," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119423, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:119423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/119423/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    consumption smoothing; scarcity; spending; consumption; gamification; Knowledge Exchange and Impact fund;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J50 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:119423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.