IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/113677.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Women who host: an intersectional critique of rentier capitalism on AirBnB

Author

Listed:
  • Gilchrist, Kate
  • Maier, George

Abstract

Scholarship on AirBnB has often brought critical focus to the advancement of rentier capitalism and gentrification through the sharing economy. In this article we draw upon in-depth interviews with women in London who host their shared living space on AirBnB, to present meaningful empirical examples of women utilizing the platform as a way of surviving. Often, women in our research turned to AirBnB after facing exclusion from traditional labor markets, based on gender, age and/or disability. Others relied on AirBnB to meet their own housing needs, for instance: subletting their own bed to meet rent payments. Rather than departing from a critical class analysis, we instead hope to nuance understandings of rentierism on AirBnB by focusing on these women as complex intersectional subjects of capitalism. While many hosts fall clearly into the category of rentier capitalists, making money through property ownership, the lived realities of hosting were often more complex. We therefore use these women's lived experiences to complicate understandings of class subjectivity in the “sharing economy”, drawing upon an intersectional perspective to showcase women who are hosting in order to subsist.

Suggested Citation

  • Gilchrist, Kate & Maier, George, 2022. "Women who host: an intersectional critique of rentier capitalism on AirBnB," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113677, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:113677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/113677/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariana Mazzucato & Alan Shipman, 2014. "Accounting for productive investment and value creation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 23(4), pages 1059-1085.
    2. Alexandrea J. Ravenelle, 2017. "Sharing economy workers: selling, not sharing," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(2), pages 281-295.
    3. Soo-Hyun Jun, 2020. "The Effects of Perceived Risk, Brand Credibility and Past Experience on Purchase Intention in the Airbnb Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Petter Törnberg & Letizia Chiappini, 2020. "Selling black places on Airbnb: Colonial discourse and the marketing of black communities in New York City," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(3), pages 553-572, May.
    5. Juliet B. Schor, 2017. "Does the sharing economy increase inequality within the eighty percent?: findings from a qualitative study of platform providers," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(2), pages 263-279.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George Maier & Kate R. Gilchrist, 2022. "Women who host: An intersectional critique of rentier capitalism on AirBnB," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 817-829, May.
    2. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Everding, Sebastian, 2020. "Do hybrids impede sustainability? How semantic reorientations and governance reforms can produce and preserve sustainability in sharing business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 174-185.
    3. Jing Lan & Yuge Ma & Dajian Zhu & Diana Mangalagiu & Thomas F. Thornton, 2017. "Enabling Value Co-Creation in the Sharing Economy: The Case of Mobike," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Katarzyna Gruszka & Andreas Novy, 2018. "Sharing the liberal utopia. The case of Uber in France and the US," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2018_07, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    5. Antonio Menor-Campos & María de los Baños García-Moreno & Tomás López-Guzmán & Amalia Hidalgo-Fernández, 2019. "Effects of Collaborative Economy: A Reflection," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-13, May.
    6. Jing Lan & Diana Mangalagiu & Yuge Ma & Thomas F. Thornton & Dajian Zhu, 2020. "Modelling consumption behaviour changes in a B2C electric vehicle-sharing system: a perceived systemic risk perspective," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 655-669, June.
    7. Agustin Cocola-Gant & Angela Hof & Christian Smigiel & Ismael Yrigoy, 2021. "Short-term rentals as a new urban frontier – evidence from European cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(7), pages 1601-1608, October.
    8. Crommelin, Laura & Troy, Laurence & Martin, Chris & Parkinson, Sharon & Hayward, Richard Donald, 2018. "Technological disruption in private housing markets: the case of Airbnb," SocArXiv cb8z3, Center for Open Science.
    9. Dolnicar, Sara, 2019. "A review of research into paid online peer-to-peer accommodation," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 248-264.
    10. Sally Zhu, 2020. "Sharing Property Sharing Labour: The Co-Production of Value in Platform Economies," Laws, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Jesús M Artero & Cristina Borra & Rosario Gómez-Alvarez, 2020. "Education, inequality and use of digital collaborative platforms: The European case," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 31(3), pages 364-382, September.
    12. Yoon Koh & Amanda Belarmino & Min Gyung Kim, 2020. "Good fences make good revenue: An examination of revenue management practices at peer-to-peer accommodations," Tourism Economics, , vol. 26(7), pages 1108-1128, November.
    13. Lerch, Christian M. & Horvat, Djerdj & Jasny, Johannes, 2024. "When manufacturers turn into digital platform providers: A transformation model to understand the platformization pathway," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    14. Gürel, Burak & Kozluca, Mina, 2022. "Chinese investment in Turkey: the Belt and Road Initiative, rising expectations and ground realities," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113841, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Rossmannek, Oliver & David, Natalie & Schramm-Klein, Hanna, 2022. "Suppliers’ loyalty to their sharing platform: The influence of multiple roles," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 272-281.
    16. Hannah JOHNSTON, 2020. "Labour geographies of the platform economy: Understanding collective organizing strategies in the context of digitally mediated work," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(1), pages 25-45, March.
    17. Yu, Zehui & Li, Yiming & Dai, Lihua, 2023. "Digital finance and regional economic resilience: Theoretical framework and empirical test," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    18. Küster, Inés & Pascual, Juan J., 2021. "Non-monetary price perceived in e-peer-to peer accommodation. Airbnb guests’ perspective," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    19. Gerber, Christine, 2022. "Gender and precarity in platform work: Old inequalities in the new world of work," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 37(2), pages 206-230.
    20. Kaushal Leena Ajit, 2018. "The Sharing Economy and Sustainability: a Case Study of India," Valahian Journal of Economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 7-16, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    class; disability; gender; platform economy; sharing economy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General
    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:113677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.