IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/1716.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

When Good Brands Do Bad

Author

Listed:
  • Aaker, Jennifer L.

    (Stanford U)

  • Fournier, Susan

    (Harvard U)

  • Brasel, Adam

    (Stanford U)

Abstract

This paper reports results from a longitudinal field experiment examining the evolution of relationships between consumers and an on-line photography brand in response to brand personality and transgression manipulations. Development patterns differed significantly for the two personalities, whereby relationships with sincere brands deepened over time in line with friendship templates, and relationships with exciting brands evinced a trajectory characteristic of short-lived flings. However, these patterns held only when the relationship proceeded without a brand transgression. Relationships with sincere brands suffered dramatically and irrevocably in the wake of transgressions but, surprisingly, showed signs of reinvigoration for exciting brands. Character inferences concerning the quality of the brand as a relationship partner mediated the results. Findings suggest a dynamic construal of brand personality, greater attention to interrupt events including transgressions, and consideration of the relationship contracts formed at the hands of different brands.

Suggested Citation

  • Aaker, Jennifer L. & Fournier, Susan & Brasel, Adam, 2003. "When Good Brands Do Bad," Research Papers 1716, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:1716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP1716.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Belk, Russell W, 1988. "Possessions and the Extended Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 139-168, September.
    2. Fournier, Susan, 1998. "Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(4), pages 343-373, March.
    3. Bolton, Ruth N & Drew, James H, 1991. "A Multistage Model of Customers' Assessments of Service Quality and Value," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(4), pages 375-384, March.
    4. Caprara, Gian Vittorio & Barbaranelli, Claudio & Guido, Gianluigi, 2001. "Brand personality: How to make the metaphor fit?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 377-395, June.
    5. Aaker, Jennifer & Benet-Martinez, Veronica & Garolera, Jordi, 2001. "Consumption Symbols as Carriers of Culture: A Study of Japanese and Spanish Brand Personality Constructs," Research Papers 1668r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sara Amoroso, 2020. "Chronicles of Consumer-Brand Experience: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 100-100, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geuens, Maggie & Weijters, Bert & De Wulf, Kristof, 2009. "A new measure of brand personality," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 97-107.
    2. Vytautas Dikcius & Eleonora Seimiene & Ramunas Casas, 2018. "Brand Personality Scale: Is It Applicable For A Small Emerging Country?," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 9(2).
    3. Viktoria Maria Radler, 2018. "20 Years of brand personality: a bibliometric review and research agenda," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 370-383, July.
    4. Stadler Blank, Ashley & Koenigstorfer, Joerg & Baumgartner, Hans, 2018. "Sport team personality: It’s not all about winning!," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 114-132.
    5. Tischer, Sven, 2012. "Measuring the impact of critical incidents on brand personality," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2012-064, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    6. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2012-064 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Jijo George & Victor Anandkumar, 2018. "Dimensions of Product Brand Personality," Vision, , vol. 22(4), pages 377-386, December.
    8. Pechtl, Hans & Heidarian, Elham, 2016. "Can a cause-related brand be perceived different from other brands?," Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Diskussionspapiere 02/2016, University of Greifswald, Faculty of Law and Economics.
    9. Klaus Heine & Glyn Atwal & Sandrine Crener-Ricard & Michel Phan, 2018. "Personality-driven luxury brand management," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(5), pages 474-487, September.
    10. Yi Xie & Siqing Peng & Daniel P. Hampson, 0. "Brand user imagery clarity (BUIC): conceptualization, measurement, and consequences," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    11. Das, Gopal, 2014. "Impacts of retail brand personality and self-congruity on store loyalty: The moderating role of gender," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 130-138.
    12. Avis, Mark, 2012. "Brand personality factor based models: A critical review," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 89-96.
    13. Strizhakova, Yuliya & Coulter, Robin A. & Price, Linda L., 2008. "The meanings of branded products: A cross-national scale development and meaning assessment," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 82-93.
    14. Cruz Tarrillo, Jose Joel & Haro Zea, Karla Liliana & Soria Quijaite, Juan Jesús, 2022. "Revisión sistemática: situación actual de la personalidad de marca para el posicionamiento estratégico," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 23(1), pages 315-340, January.
    15. Nobre, Helena & Simões, Cláudia, 2019. "NewLux Brand Relationship Scale: Capturing the scope of mass-consumed luxury brand relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 328-338.
    16. Ahmet TUZCUOĞLU, Sema Nur FAYDA, Yasenkare TUNIYAZI, Zübeyde ÖZ, 2018. "Do The Effects Of Brand Personality Dimensions On Brand Loyalty Change According To Consumers’ Personalities?," Turkish Journal of Marketing, Ali Çağlar Çakmak, vol. 3(2), pages 1-24.
    17. Ranfagni, Silvia & Crawford Camiciottoli, Belinda & Faraoni, Monica, 2016. "How to Measure Alignment in Perceptions of Brand Personality Within Online Communities: Interdisciplinary Insights," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 70-85.
    18. Japutra, Arnold & Molinillo, Sebastian, 2019. "Responsible and active brand personality: On the relationships with brand experience and key relationship constructs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 464-471.
    19. Ingrid Moons & Patrick De Pelsmacker, 2015. "Self-Brand Personality Differences and Attitudes towards Electric Cars," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-18, September.
    20. María de la Paz Toldos Romero, 2012. "Dimensions Of Brand Personality In Mexico," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(5), pages 35-47.
    21. Pan, Li & Zhang, Meng & Gursoy, Dogan & Lu, Lu, 2017. "Development and validation of a destination personality scale for mainland Chinese travelers," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 338-348.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:1716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.