IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/harjfk/rwp03-004.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Information, Institutions and Governance: Advancing a Basic Social Science Research Program for Digital Government

Author

Listed:
  • Fountain, Jane E.

    (Harvard U)

Abstract

Throughout the globe, the sweep of information and communication technologies offers unprecedented opportunities for the advancement of governance and society. But information and communication technologies alone are inadequate to foster such benefits. An important, time-sensitive opportunity exists to make a major difference in the development of digital governance and society globally. An applied, rigorous research agenda would clarify for policymakers and the research community the costs and benefits of alternative future visions and paths. A solid research agenda, built through a global network of researchers, possesses the potential to forecast likely positive results and negative outcomes before government actions are taken and resources committed. A strong basic research agenda can potentially save billions of dollars by generating knowledge and recommendations proactively rather than post mortems retroactively. A coherent, focused global research agenda for technology and governance, whose outlines are presented in this report, holds promise to catalyze an invigoration of the applied social sciences. Social science departments worldwide have tended to lag behind empirical developments in the societal and governmental use of information and communication technologies. Many academic researchers have been slow, perhaps even reluctant, to consider information and communication technologies as endogenous variables and to take on the difficult and risky intellectual work involved in the extension and refinement of standard theories and conceptual frameworks. Thus, more attention to theory development and empirical research in mainstream social sciences has the potential both to leverage existing knowledge to better understand the information revolution and, reciprocally, to extend many twentieth century theories and concepts in which information and communication technologies are implicitly assumed to be pre-Internet. This wide-ranging report, written to provide guidance to the National Science Foundation, draws from several disciplines and applied fields, including political science, computer science, public policy and management, sociology, psychology, and organizational behavior. Its purpose is to broaden and deepen the global research base for digital government by drawing more extensively and strategically on the social and policy sciences to expand the range of theories and conceptual frameworks that might be leveraged in this domain. A powerful, global research base is critical if information and communication technologies are to be developed and used to foster stronger democratic societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Fountain, Jane E., 2003. "Information, Institutions and Governance: Advancing a Basic Social Science Research Program for Digital Government," Working Paper Series rwp03-004, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp03-004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=68
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maxine Robertson & Jacky Swan & Sue Newell, 1996. "The Role of Networks In the Diffusion of Technological Innovation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 333-359, May.
    2. Madhavan Parthasarathy & Anol Bhattacherjee, 1998. "Understanding Post-Adoption Behavior in the Context of Online Services," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 362-379, December.
    3. anonymous, 1982. "Communication," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(11), pages 1350-1351, November.
    4. Dennis Epple & Linda Argote & Rukmini Devadas, 1991. "Organizational Learning Curves: A Method for Investigating Intra-Plant Transfer of Knowledge Acquired Through Learning by Doing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 58-70, February.
    5. Paul Attewell, 1992. "Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Robert E. Kraut & Ronald E. Rice & Colleen Cool & Robert S. Fish, 1998. "Varieties of Social Influence: The Role of Utility and Norms in the Success of a New Communication Medium," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 437-453, August.
    7. anonymous, 1982. "Communication," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 337-337, March.
    8. Manju K. Ahuja & Kathleen M. Carley, 1999. "Network Structure in Virtual Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(6), pages 741-757, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reggi, Luigi & Arduini, Davide & Biagetti, Marco & Zanfei, Antonello, 2014. "How advanced are Italian regions in terms of public e-services? The construction of a composite indicator to analyze patterns of innovation diffusion in the public sector," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 514-529.
    2. Ada Scupola & Antonello Zanfei, 2014. "The changing organization of innovation in public services.The case of digital library," Working Papers 1411, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics - Scientific Committee - L. Stefanini & G. Travaglini, revised 2014.
    3. Arduini, Davide & Denni, Mario & Lucchese, Matteo & Nurra, Alessandra & Zanfei, Antonello, 2013. "The role of technology, organization and contextual factors in the development of e-Government services: An empirical analysis on Italian Local Public Administrations," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 177-189.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dorra Yahiaoui & Hela Chebbi, 2008. "The limits of top-down transfers within a multinational corporation: the need for knowledge hybridization," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 85-104.
    2. Richard Higgins & Arijit Mukherjee, 2010. "Deregulation redux: does mandating access to bottleneck facilities necessarily improve welfare?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 363-377, March.
    3. Robert S. Huckman & Bradley R. Staats, 2008. "Variation in Experience and Team Familiarity: Addressing the Knowledge Acquisition-Application Problem," Harvard Business School Working Papers 09-035, Harvard Business School.
    4. Aaron Cicourel, 2006. "Cognitive/affective processes, social interaction, and social structure as representational re-descriptions: their contrastive bandwidths and spatio-temporal foci," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 5(1), pages 39-70, June.
    5. Neil Karunaratne, 1997. "High-Tech Innovation, Growth and Trade Dynamics in Australia," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 151-170, April.
    6. Hippel, Eric von., 1995. ""Sticky information" and new marketing research methods," Working papers 3753-95., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    7. Muhammad Islam & Wassim Shahin, 2001. "Applying economic methodology to the war on terrorism," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 31(1), pages 7-26, September.
    8. Gerald C. Kane & Maryam Alavi, 2007. "Information Technology and Organizational Learning: An Investigation of Exploration and Exploitation Processes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(5), pages 796-812, October.
    9. Zhen Wang & Yi-feng Chen & Dean Tjosvold & Kan Shi, 2010. "Cooperative goals and team agreeableness composition for constructive controversy in China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 139-153, March.
    10. Hannu Nurmi & Hannu Salonen, 2008. "More Borda Count Variations for Project Assesment," Czech Economic Review, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, vol. 2(2), pages 109-122, September.
    11. Walter Wasserfallen & Jean-Marie Gassmann & Andreas Gfeller, 1986. "Die Nachfrage nach Telefongesprächen - Erklärung und Prognose Eine empirische Untersuchung für die Schweiz," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 122(II), pages 187-197, June.
    12. Paulson, Nicholas D. & Hart, Chad E., 2006. "A Spatial Approach to Addressing Weather Derivative Basis Risk: A Drought Insurance Example," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21249, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Sosa, Manuel E., 2003. "Factors that influence technical communication in distributed product development : an empirical study in the telecommunications industry," Working papers WP 4123-00., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    14. Ancona, Deborah G. (Deborah Gladstein). & Caldwell, David F., 1987. "Understanding the task of the new product team," Working papers 1947-87., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    15. West, Gale E. & Larue, Bruno, 2004. "Profiling Consumer Trend-setters in the Canadian Healthy-foods Market," CAFRI: Current Agriculture, Food and Resource Issues, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society, issue 5, pages 1-18, March.
    16. Hauser, John R. & Simester, Duncan I. & Wernerfelt, Birger., 1995. "Internal customers and internal suppliers," Working papers 3759-95. WP (Internationa, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    17. Ancona, Deborah G. (Deborah Gladstein). & Caldwell, David E., 1990. "Cross functional teams : blessing or curse for new problem development," Working papers 3179-90., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    18. Di Stefano, Giada & Gambardella, Alfonso & Verona, Gianmario, 2012. "Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 1283-1295.
    19. Griffin, Abbie. & International Center for Research on the Management of Technology., 1990. "Patterns of communication among marketing, engineering and manufacturing : a comparison between two new product teams," Working papers #16-90., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    20. Malone, Thomas W., 2003. "Toward intelligent message routing systems," Working papers no. 129 90s ; no. 85-010, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp03-004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ksharus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.