IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ebg/heccah/1358.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring Regulatory Complexity

Author

Listed:
  • Colliard, Jean-Edouard

    (HEC Paris)

  • Georg, Co-Pierre

    (EDHEC Business School)

Abstract

Despite a heated debate on the complexity of financial regulation, a comprehensive framework to study regulatory complexity is lacking. We propose one inspired by the analysis of algorithmic complexity in computer science. We use this framework to distinguish different dimensions of complexity, classify existing measures, develop new ones, compute them on two examples - Basel I and the Dodd-Frank Act - and validate them using novel experiments. Our framework offers a quantitative approach to the policy trade-off between regulatory complexity and precision. Our toolkit is freely available and allows researchers to measure the complexity of any normative text and test alternative measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Colliard, Jean-Edouard & Georg, Co-Pierre, 2020. "Measuring Regulatory Complexity," HEC Research Papers Series 1358, HEC Paris.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebg:heccah:1358
    DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3523824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3523824
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2139/ssrn.3523824?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gai, Prasanna & Kemp, Malcolm & Sánchez Serrano, Antonio & Schnabel, Isabel, 2019. "Regulatory complexity and the quest for robust regulation," Report of the Advisory Scientific Committee 8, European Systemic Risk Board.
    2. Herring, Richard J., 2018. "The Evolving Complexity of Capital Regulation," Working Papers 18-01, University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Weiss Center.
    3. Germán Gutiérrez & Thomas Philippon, 2019. "The Failure of Free Entry," NBER Working Papers 26001, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. repec:ces:ifodic:v:8:y:2010:i:2:p:14566986 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Richard J. Herring, 2018. "The Evolving Complexity of Capital Regulation," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 53(2), pages 183-205, June.
    6. Carlin, Bruce I., 2009. "Strategic price complexity in retail financial markets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 278-287, March.
    7. Martin Hellwig, 2010. "Capital Regulation after the Crisis: Business as Usual?," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 8(02), pages 40-46, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vita, Giuseppe Di, 2021. "Political corruption and legislative complexity: Two sides of same coin?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 136-147.
    2. Singla, Shikhar, 2023. "Regulatory costs and market power," LawFin Working Paper Series 47, Goethe University, Center for Advanced Studies on the Foundations of Law and Finance (LawFin).
    3. Hałaj, Grzegorz & Martinez-Jaramillo, Serafin & Battiston, Stefano, 2024. "Financial stability through the lens of complex systems," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Witte, Niklas, 2024. "Capital requirements in Pillar 1 or Pillar 2: does it matter for market discipline?," Working Paper Series 2988, European Central Bank.
    2. Marcus Buckmann & Andy Haldane & Anne-Caroline Hüser, 2021. "Comparing minds and machines: implications for financial stability," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 479-508.
    3. Renaud Beaupain & Yann Braouezec, 2022. "International banking regulation and Tier 1 capital ratios. On the robustness of the critical average risk weight framework," Working Papers 2022-ACF-06, IESEG School of Management.
    4. Beaupain, Renaud & Braouezec, Yann, 2024. "International banking regulation and Tier 1 capital ratios. On the robustness of the critical average risk weight framework," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. James R. Barth & Stephen Matteo Miller, 2018. "On the Rising Complexity of Bank Regulatory Capital Requirements: From Global Guidelines to their United States (US) Implementation," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-33, November.
    6. Thomas L. Hogan, 2021. "A Review of the Regulatory Impact Analysis of Risk-Based Capital and Related Liquidity Rules," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-29, January.
    7. Ly, Kim Cuong & Shimizu, Katsutoshi, 2021. "Did Basel regulation cause a significant procyclicality?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    8. Barth, James R. & Miller, Stephen Matteo, 2018. "Benefits and costs of a higher bank “leverage ratio”," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 37-52.
    9. Hughes, Joseph P. & Moon, Choon-Geol, 2022. "How bad is a bad loan? Distinguishing inherent credit risk from inefficient lending (Does the capital market price this difference?)," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. Franklin Allen & Itay Goldstein & Julapa Jagtiani, 2018. "The Interplay among Financial Regulations, Resilience, and Growth," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 53(2), pages 141-162, June.
    11. Joseph P. Hughes, 2018. "Comments on “The Evolving Complexity of Capital Regulation”," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 53(2), pages 207-210, June.
    12. Stephen Matteo Miller & Blake Hoarty, 2021. "On regulation and excess reserves: The case of Basel III," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 44(2), pages 215-247, June.
    13. repec:ies:wpaper:f202211 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Muhammad Farhan Basheer & Mohamad Helmi Hidthiir & Waeibrorheem Waemustafa, 2019. "Impact of Bank Regulatory Change and Bank Specific Factors Upon Off-Balance-Sheet Activities Across Commercial Banks in South Asia," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(4), pages 419-431, April.
    15. Michele Leonardo Bianchi & Alberto Maria Sorrentino, 2022. "Exploring the Systemic Risk of Domestic Banks with ΔCoVaR and Elastic-Net," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 62(1), pages 127-141, October.
    16. Douglas da Rosa München & Herbert Kimura, 2020. "Regulatory Banking Leverage: what do you know?," Working Papers Series 540, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
    17. Krause, Thomas & Sfrappini, Eleonora & Tonzer, Lena & Zgherea, Cristina, 2024. "How do EU banks' funding costs respond to the CRD IV? An assessment based on the Banking Union directives database," IWH Discussion Papers 12/2024, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    18. Allen, Franklin & Jagtiani, Julapa & Goldstein, Itay, 2018. "The Interplay between Financial Regulations, Resilience, and Growth," CEPR Discussion Papers 12861, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Huang, Qiubin & de Haan, Jakob & Scholtens, Bert, 2020. "Does bank capitalization matter for bank stock returns?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    20. Persson, Petra, 2018. "Attention manipulation and information overload," Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 78-106, May.
    21. Francesco Trebbi & Miao Ben Zhang, 2022. "The Cost of Regulatory Compliance in the United States," NBER Working Papers 30691, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Financial Regulation; Capital Regulation; Regulatory Complexity; Basel Accords;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G41 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebg:heccah:1358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antoine Haldemann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hecpafr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.