IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dnb/dnbwpp/814.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The ecosystem service degradation sensitivity indicator (EDSI): A new framework for understanding the financial risk repercussions of nature degradation

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastien Gallet
  • Antje Hendricks
  • Julja Prodani

Abstract

This paper introduces a new framework for integrating dependence on nature (ecosystem services) and the degree of nature degradation in estimations of credit risk-related losses for banks. The framework brings the field of nature-related financial risks forward by proposing a capital-based sensitivity indicator to nature degradation, thereby moving from an “exposure†approach to a “financial risk†approach. This ecosystem service degradation sensitivity indicator (EDSI) shows how much of a bank’s available capital buffer on top of its minimum requirements is lost due to a shock on nature. It enables cross-bank and cross-country comparison of potential financial losses related to nature degradation. Our results indicate that incorporating nature degradation into financial risk estimates adds an important - and currently missing - layer of risk and offers additional differentiation in capital impact among banks and countries. While in this paper the framework uses hypothetical shocks on nature and can therefore only produce comparative sensitivity indicators, upon calibrating a shock on different ecosystem services the framework can be used to stress-test financial institutions’ solvency position.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastien Gallet & Antje Hendricks & Julja Prodani, 2024. "The ecosystem service degradation sensitivity indicator (EDSI): A new framework for understanding the financial risk repercussions of nature degradation," Working Papers 814, DNB.
  • Handle: RePEc:dnb:dnbwpp:814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.dnb.nl/media/yiqpkmy0/working_paper_no-814.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hadji-Lazaro, Paul & Salin, Mathilde & Svartzman, Romain & Espagne, Etienne & Gauthey, Julien & Berger, Joshua & Calas, Julien & Godin, Antoine & Vallier, Antoine, 2024. "Biodiversity loss and financial stability as a new frontier for central banks: An exploration for France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    2. Julien CALAS & Etienne ESPAGNE & Antoine GODIN & Julie MAURIN, 2022. "Global biodiversity scenarios: what do they tell us for Biodiversity-Related Financial Risks?," Working Paper df49be12-6355-45d6-84e3-4, Agence française de développement.
    3. Merton, Robert C, 1974. "On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 29(2), pages 449-470, May.
    4. Lelli, Chiara & Parisi, Laura & Heemskerk, Irene & Boldrini, Simone & Ceglar, Andrej, 2023. "Living in a world of disappearing nature: physical risk and the implications for financial stability," Occasional Paper Series 333, European Central Bank.
    5. Mr. Amadou N Sy & Mr. Jorge A Chan-Lau, 2006. "Distance-to-Default in Banking: A Bridge Too Far?," IMF Working Papers 2006/215, International Monetary Fund.
    6. Reinders, Henk Jan & Schoenmaker, Dirk & van Dijk, Mathijs, 2023. "A finance approach to climate stress testing," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anastasia I. Koutsomanoli‐Filippaki & Emmanuel C. Mamatzakis, 2011. "Efficiency under quantile regression: What is the relationship with risk in the EU banking industry?," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 84-95, May.
    2. Saldías, Martín, 2013. "Systemic risk analysis using forward-looking Distance-to-Default series," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 498-517.
    3. D. E. Allen & M. McAleer & R. J. Powell & A. K. Singh, 2016. "A capital adequacy buffer model," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 175-179, February.
    4. Giovanni Calice & Christos Ioannidis & Julian Williams, 2012. "Credit Derivatives and the Default Risk of Large Complex Financial Institutions," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 42(1), pages 85-107, October.
    5. Andrene Senior & Sherene A. Bailey, 2017. "Estimación y pronóstico del riesgo de incumplimiento: evidencias para Jamaica," Monetaria, Centro de Estudios Monetarios Latinoamericanos, CEMLA, vol. 0(1), pages 141-174, enero-jun.
    6. Nguyen, Quyen & Diaz-Rainey, Ivan & Kuruppuarachchi, Duminda, 2023. "In search of climate distress risk," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    7. Rachita Gulati & M. Kabir Hassan & Vincent Charles, 2024. "Developing a New Multidimensional Index of Bank Stability and Its Usage in the Design of Optimal Policy Interventions," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(4), pages 1281-1325, April.
    8. Winsen, Joseph K., 2010. "An overview of project finance binomial loan valuation," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 84-89, April.
    9. Jung, Alexander & Uhlig, Harald, 2019. "Monetary policy shocks and the health of banks," Working Paper Series 2303, European Central Bank.
    10. László Békési & Lorant Kaszab & Szabolcs Szentmihályi, 2017. "The EAGLE model for Hungary - a global perspective," MNB Working Papers 2017/7, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary).
    11. Kimie Harada & Takatoshi Ito & Shuhei Takahashi, 2010. "Is the Distance to Default a Good Measure in Predicting Bank Failures? Case Studies," NBER Working Papers 16182, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Berlin, Mitchell & Byun, Sung Je & D'Erasmo, Pablo & Yu, Edison, 2024. "Measuring climate transition risk at the regional level with an application to community banks," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    13. R.J. Powell, 2017. "New perspectives on bank risk in Malaysia," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1326217-132, January.
    14. Schoenmaker, Dirk & Reinders, Henk Jan & Van Dijk, Mathijs, 2020. "Is COVID-19 a threat to financial stability in Europe?," CEPR Discussion Papers 14922, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Harada, Kimie & Ito, Takatoshi, 2011. "Did mergers help Japanese mega-banks avoid failure? Analysis of the distance to default of banks," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 1-22, March.
    16. Chabot, Miia & Bertrand, Jean-Louis, 2023. "Climate risks and financial stability: Evidence from the European financial system," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    17. Kim Ristolainen, 2016. "The relationship between distance-to-default and CDS spreads as measures of default risk for European banks," Journal of Banking and Financial Economics, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(5), pages 121-143, June.
    18. Nguyen, Quyen & Diaz-Rainey, Ivan & Kuruppuarachchi, Duminda & McCarten, Matthew & Tan, Eric K.M., 2023. "Climate transition risk in U.S. loan portfolios: Are all banks the same?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    19. Chan, Stephanie & Wijnbergen, Sweder, 2017. "CoCo Design, Risk Shifting Incentives and Financial Fragility," ECMI Papers 12166, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    20. Chao, Wang & Jing, Ma & Xiaoxing, Liu, 2023. "Optimizing systemic risk through credit network reconstruction," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    nature degradation; ecosystem services; biodiversity loss; dependence score; financial stability; risk; credit risk losses; Merton model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dnb:dnbwpp:814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: DNB (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dnbgvnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.