IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/diw/diwrup/42de.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Die Kontroverse um das Freihandelsabkommen TTIP

Author

Listed:
  • Philipp M. Richter
  • Greta F. Schäffer

Abstract

Ein kurzer Name sorgt für eine anhaltende Debatte: TTIP [tiːt|p]. Seit Beginn der Verhandlungen im Sommer 2013 trägt die mediale Berichterstattung über die geplante „Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership“ zwischen der EU und den USA zur kritischen Auseinandersetzung mit der Thematik bei. Hierbei ergibt sich bisweilen die Schwierigkeit, sachlich fundierte Argumente von einseitigen Stellungnahmen zu differenzieren. Faktisch handelt es sich bei TTIP um ein Freihandels- und Investitionsabkommen, dessen konkrete Ausgestaltung derzeit verhandelt wird. Befürworter erwarten einen Wachstumsimpuls der amerikanischen und europäischen Wirtschaft, neue Arbeitsplätze und eine Stärkung der transatlantischen Wertegemeinschaft. Kritiker weisen demgegenüber auf die Intransparenz des Verhandlungsprozesses hin und fürchten einen Abbau von Standards, eine Beeinträchtigung des Verbraucherschutzes und den Verlust staatlicher Souveränität bei Rechtsprechungen.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp M. Richter & Greta F. Schäffer, 2014. "Die Kontroverse um das Freihandelsabkommen TTIP," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 42, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwrup:42de
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.486057.de/DIW_Roundup_42_de.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriel Felbermayr & Mario Larch & Finn Krüger & Lisandra Flach & Erdal Yalcin & Sebastian Benz, 2013. "Dimensionen und Auswirkungen eines Freihandelsabkommens zwischen der EU und den USA," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 62, October.
    2. Gabriel Felbermayr & Mario Larch & Gabriel J. Felbermayr, 2013. "The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP): Potentials, Problems and Perspectives," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 14(02), pages 49-60, August.
    3. Lionel Fontagné & Julien Gourdon & Sébastien Jean, 2013. "Transatlantic Trade: Whither Partnership, Which Economic Consequences?," CEPII Policy Brief 2013-01, CEPII research center.
    4. Fredrik Erixon, 2014. "The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and the Shifting Structure of Global Trade Policy," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 14(04), pages 18-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weeber, Joachim & Becker, Amelie & Elvers, Joost Henrik & Fruggel, Kathrin & Laouros, Anastasios & Pergande, Katharina & Ritz, Fabian & Schmitt, Finja & Werner, Christopher & Wilkens, Marc & Wulf, Arn, 2014. "TTIP: Theoretische Grundlagen, Maßnahmen und Wirkungen," Arbeitspapiere der Nordakademie 2014-08, Nordakademie - Hochschule der Wirtschaft.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philipp M. Richter & Greta F. Schäffer, 2014. "The Controversy over the Free-Trade Agreement TTIP," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 42, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Gabriel Felbermayr & Benedikt Heid & Mario Larch & Erdal Yalcin, 2015. "Macroeconomic potentials of transatlantic free trade: a high resolution perspective for Europe and the world," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 30(83), pages 491-537.
    3. Disdier, Anne‐Célia & Emlinger, Charlotte & Fouré, Jean, 2016. "Interdependencies between Atlantic and Pacific agreements: Evidence from agri-food sectors," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 241-253.
    4. Gabriel Felbermayr & Mario Larch & Mario Larch, 2014. "Transatlantic Free Trade: Questions and Answers from the Vantage Point of Trade Theory," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 14(04), pages 03-17, January.
    5. Oliver Krebs & Michael Pflüger, 2018. "How deep is your love? A quantitative spatial analysis of the transatlantic trade partnership," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 171-222, February.
    6. Bekkers, Eddy, 2019. "The welfare effects of trade policy experiments in quantitative trade models: The role of solution methods and baseline calibration," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2019-02, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    7. Eddy Bekkers & Hugo Rojas-Romagosa, 2018. "Non-tariff Measure Estimations in Different Impact Assessments," RSCAS Working Papers 2018/40, European University Institute.
    8. Krebs, Oliver & Pflüger, Michael P., 2015. "How Deep Is Your Love? A Quantitative Spatial Analysis of the Transatlantic Trade Partnership," IZA Discussion Papers 9021, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Anne-Célia Disdier & Charlotte Emlinger & Jean Fouré, 2015. "Atlantic versus Pacific Agreement in Agri-food Sectors: Does the Winner Take it All?," Working Papers halshs-01190840, HAL.
    10. John C. Beghin & Jean-Christophe Bureau & Alexandre Gohin, 2017. "The Impact of an EU–US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement on Biofuel and Feedstock Markets," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(2), pages 321-344, June.
    11. Beghin, John C. & Bureau, Jean-Christophe & Gohin, Alex, 2014. "The Impact of an EU-US TTIP Agreement on Biofuel and Feedstock Markets," 2014: Food, Resources and Conflict, December 7-9, 2014. San Diego, California 197153, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    12. Guimbard, Houssein & Le Goff, Maëlan, 2014. "Mega Deals: What Consequences for sub-Saharan Africa?," Conference papers 332514, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    13. Paul Welfens & Tony Irawan, 2014. "Transatlantic trade and investment partnership: sectoral and macroeconomic perspectives for Germany, the EU and the US," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 293-328, September.
    14. John C. Beghin & Jean-Christophe Bureau & Alexandre Gohin, 2017. "The Impact of an EU–US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement on Biofuel and Feedstock Markets," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(2), pages 321-344, June.
    15. Fritz Breuss, 2014. "TTIP und ihre Auswirkungen auf Österreich. Ein kritischer Literaturüberblick," WIFO Working Papers 468, WIFO.
    16. Raza, Werner & Grumiller, Jan & Taylor, Lance & Tröster, Bernhard & von Arnim, Rudi, 2014. "ASSESS_TTIP: Assessing the claimed benefits of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership," Policy Notes 10/2014, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE).
    17. Gabriel Felbermayr & Benedikt Heid & Mario Larch, 2015. "TTIP: Small Gains, High Risks?," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 15(04), pages 20-30, January.
    18. Gabriel Felbermayr & Wilhelm Kohler & Rahel Aichele & Günther Klee & Erdal Yalcin, 2015. "Potential impact of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partner (TTIP) on developing and emerging countries," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 67, October.
    19. Latorre, María C. & Yonezawa, Hidemichi, 2018. "Stopped TTIP? Its potential impact on the world and the role of neglected FDI," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 99-120.
    20. Mario Larch & Yoto Yotov, 2017. "On the impact of TTIP in Southeastern and Eastern Europe: A quantitative analysis," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 54-73,74-92.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwrup:42de. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.