IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dal/wpaper/daleconwp2007-05.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Kinked Demand Curve with a Conjectural Hitch – A Micro Extension with Macro Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Bradfield

    (Department of Economics, Dalhousie University)

Abstract

Textbooks present the kinked demand curve model as an interesting but largely irrelevant explanation for oligopoly markets with stable prices. This follows Stigler’s misrepresentation of Sweezy’s article. Yet the original articles suggested that the kinked demand curve might also explain price instability and apparently perverse business decisions. This paper uses an extension of the kinked demand curve, the “conjectural hitch,” which recognizes that a firm may feel that new market conditions require a change in behaviour to protect profits. Firms may raise prices because of falling demand. If a significant number of industries behave this way, stagflation and even job- less recovery will be generated in the economy at large. On the cost side, the conjectural hitch can explain why firms raise prices when fixed costs increase, for instance, when interest rates rise.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Bradfield, 2007. "The Kinked Demand Curve with a Conjectural Hitch – A Micro Extension with Macro Implications," Working Papers daleconwp2007-05, Dalhousie University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:dal:wpaper:daleconwp2007-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wp.economics.dal.ca/RePEc/dal/wpaper/DalEconWP2007-05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rothschild, R, 1992. "A Simple Proof of Sweezy's 'Kinked-Demand' Conjecture," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 39(1), pages 69-75, February.
    2. C. W. Efroymson, 1955. "The Kinked Oligopoly Curve Reconsidered," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 69(1), pages 119-136.
    3. Joydeep Bhattacharya & Noritaka Kudoh, 2002. "Tight money policies and inflation revisited," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(2), pages 185-217, May.
    4. Katharine S. Neiss, 2001. "The markup and inflation: evidence in OECD countries," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 34(2), pages 570-587, May.
    5. Pierre Fortin, 1999. "The great Canadian slump: a rejoinder to Freedman and Macklem," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 32(4), pages 1082-1092, August.
    6. Craig Freedman, 1995. "The Economist as Mythmaker–Stigler’s Kinky Transformation," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 175-209, March.
    7. Paul M. Sweezy, 1939. "Demand Under Conditions of Oligopoly," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(4), pages 568-568.
    8. Skinner, Andrew S, 1981. "Of Factor and Commodity Markets: A Note on E. H. Chamberlin," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 122-134, March.
    9. Stigler, George J, 1978. "The Literature of Economics: The Case of the Kinked Oligopoly Demand Curve," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 16(2), pages 185-204, April.
    10. R. L. Hall & C. J. Hitch, 1939. "Price Theory And Business Behaviour," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 0(1), pages 12-45.
    11. George J. Stigler, 1947. "The Kinky Oligopoly Demand Curve and Rigid Prices," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 55(5), pages 432-432.
    12. M. W. Reder, 1947. "A Reconsideration of the Marginal Productivity Theory," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 55(5), pages 450-450.
    13. Booth, D L, et al, 1991. "An Empirical Model of Capacity Expansion and Pricing in an Oligopoly with Barometric Price Leadership: A Case Study of the Newsprint Industry in North America," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 255-276, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sen, Debapriya, 2004. "The kinked demand curve revisited," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 99-105, July.
    2. Currarini, Sergio & Marini, Marco, 2011. "Kinked norms of behaviour and cooperation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 110(3), pages 223-225, March.
    3. R. Rothschild, 2010. "Kinked Demand Curves," Chapters, in: Mark Blaug & Peter Lloyd (ed.), Famous Figures and Diagrams in Economics, chapter 19, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Stéphane Dupraz, 2024. "A Kinked‐Demand Theory of Price Rigidity," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 56(2-3), pages 325-363, March.
    5. Rudel, R.K. & Creek, C.R. & Walsh, R.G., 1972. "Advertised and Instore Specials: A Kinked Oligopoly Demand Theory of Supermarket Behavior," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 323732, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    6. Stuckey, John A. & Anderson, Jock R., 1974. "Demand Analysis of the Sydney Banana Market," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(01), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Alexander L. Wolman, 2007. "The frequency and costs of individual price adjustment," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 531-552.
    8. Surendra K. Kaushik & William L. Casey Jr., 1982. "The Kinked-Demand Model of Oligopoly: Textbook Departures from the Original Sweezy Model," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 26(2), pages 25-32, October.
    9. Kimolo, Deogratius, 2018. "Price adjustment behaviour of manufacturing and service sector firms in Tanzania: a survey evidence of price stickiness," MPRA Paper 114941, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Luís Cabral, 2016. "Living Up to Expectations: Corporate Reputation and Persistence of Firm Performance," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(1), pages 2-11, March.
    11. Richards, Timothy J. & Gómez, Miguel I. & Printezis, Iryna, 2014. "Hysteresis, Price Acceptance, and Reference Prices," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 164872, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Cynthia L. Doniger & J. David López-Salido, 2017. "Hysteresis via Endogenous Rigidity in Wages and Participation," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2017-044, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    13. Garrod, Luke, 2012. "Collusive price rigidity under price-matching punishments," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 471-482.
    14. Ahrens, Steffen & Pirschel, Inske & Snower, Dennis J., 2017. "A theory of price adjustment under loss aversion," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 78-95.
    15. Jaylson Jair da Silveira & Gilberto Tadeu Lima, 2016. "Effort Elicitation, Wage Differentials and Income Distribution in A Wage-Led Growth Regime," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(1), pages 44-75, February.
    16. ., 2013. "Variations in the fitness of firms, dynamic economic performance, and vulnerability," Chapters, in: Competition, Diversity and Economic Performance, chapter 10, pages 202-217, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Gilberto Tadeu Lima & Jaylson Jair da Silveira, 2020. "Macroeconomic performance under evolutionary dynamics of employee profit-sharing," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 8(4), pages 589–615-5, October.
    18. Maman Setiawan & Grigorios Emvalomatis & Alfons Oude Lansink, 2015. "Price Rigidity and Industrial Concentration: Evidence from the Indonesian Food and Beverages Industry," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 29(1), pages 61-72, March.
    19. Hansen, Per Svejstrup & Mollgaard, Hans Peter & Overgaard, Per Baltzer & Sorensen, Jan Rose, 1996. "Asymmetric adjustment in symmetric duopoly," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 183-188, November.
    20. Figus, Gioele & McGregor, Peter G. & Swales, J. Kim & Turner, Karen, 2020. "Do sticky energy prices impact the time paths of rebound effects associated with energy efficiency actions?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dal:wpaper:daleconwp2007-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: James McNeil (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dedalca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.