IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crs/wpaper/2003-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Deviance Information Criteria for Missing Data Models

Author

Listed:
  • Gilles Celeux

    (Crest)

  • Florence Forbes

    (Crest)

  • Christian P, Robert

    (Crest)

  • Michael Titterington

    (Crest)

Abstract

The deviance information criterion (DIC) introduced by Spiegelhalteret al. (2002) is directly inspired by linear and generalised linear models,but it is not so naturally de ned for missing data models. In this paper,we reassess the criterion for such models, testing the behaviour of variousextensions in the cases of mixture and random e ect models.

Suggested Citation

  • Gilles Celeux & Florence Forbes & Christian P, Robert & Michael Titterington, 2003. "Deviance Information Criteria for Missing Data Models," Working Papers 2003-30, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    • Handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2003-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crest.science/RePEc/wpstorage/2003-30.pdf
    File Function: Crest working paper version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    2. Matthew Stephens, 2000. "Dealing with label switching in mixture models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(4), pages 795-809.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Papastamoulis, Panagiotis, 2018. "Overfitting Bayesian mixtures of factor analyzers with an unknown number of components," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 220-234.
    2. Royce Anders & William Batchelder, 2015. "Cultural Consensus Theory for the Ordinal Data Case," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 151-181, March.
    3. Lu, Xiaosun & Huang, Yangxin & Zhu, Yiliang, 2016. "Finite mixture of nonlinear mixed-effects joint models in the presence of missing and mismeasured covariate, with application to AIDS studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 119-130.
    4. Yuan Fang & Dimitris Karlis & Sanjeena Subedi, 2022. "Infinite Mixtures of Multivariate Normal-Inverse Gaussian Distributions for Clustering of Skewed Data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 39(3), pages 510-552, November.
    5. Terrance Savitsky & Daniel McCaffrey, 2014. "Bayesian Hierarchical Multivariate Formulation with Factor Analysis for Nested Ordinal Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 275-302, April.
    6. Lubrano, Michel & Ndoye, Abdoul Aziz Junior, 2016. "Income inequality decomposition using a finite mixture of log-normal distributions: A Bayesian approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 830-846.
    7. Brian Neelon & A. James O'Malley & Sharon-Lise T. Normand, 2011. "A Bayesian Two-Part Latent Class Model for Longitudinal Medical Expenditure Data: Assessing the Impact of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Parity," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 280-289, March.
    8. Shotwell Matthew S & Slate Elizabeth H, 2010. "Bayesian Modeling of Footrace Finishing Times," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 6(3), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Komárek, Arnost, 2009. "A new R package for Bayesian estimation of multivariate normal mixtures allowing for selection of the number of components and interval-censored data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 3932-3947, October.
    10. Eric M. Schwartz & Eric T. Bradlow & Peter S. Fader, 2014. "Model Selection Using Database Characteristics: Developing a Classification Tree for Longitudinal Incidence Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 188-205, March.
    11. Benjamin E. Leiby & Mary D. Sammel & Thomas R. Ten Have & Kevin G. Lynch, 2009. "Identification of multivariate responders and non‐responders by using Bayesian growth curve latent class models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 58(4), pages 505-524, September.
    12. Arima, Serena & Basset, Alberto & Jona Lasinio, Giovanna & Pollice, Alessio & Rosati, Ilaria, 2013. "A hierarchical Bayesian model for the ecological status classification of lagoons," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 187-195.
    13. Xiaoyi Han & Lung-Fei Lee, 2016. "Bayesian Analysis of Spatial Panel Autoregressive Models With Time-Varying Endogenous Spatial Weight Matrices, Common Factors, and Random Coefficients," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 642-660, October.
    14. James C. Slaughter & Amy H. Herring & John M. Thorp, 2009. "A Bayesian Latent Variable Mixture Model for Longitudinal Fetal Growth," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1233-1242, December.
    15. Park, Byung-Jung & Zhang, Yunlong & Lord, Dominique, 2010. "Bayesian mixture modeling approach to account for heterogeneity in speed data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 662-673, June.
    16. Marco, Nicholas & Şentürk, Damla & Jeste, Shafali & DiStefano, Charlotte C. & Dickinson, Abigail & Telesca, Donatello, 2024. "Flexible regularized estimation in high-dimensional mixed membership models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    17. Hui, Francis K.C., 2017. "Model-based simultaneous clustering and ordination of multivariate abundance data in ecology," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-10.
    18. Bei Jiang & Michael R. Elliott & Mary D. Sammel & Naisyin Wang, 2015. "Joint modeling of cross-sectional health outcomes and longitudinal predictors via mixtures of means and variances," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 487-497, June.
    19. Oliver J. Rutz & Garrett P. Sonnier, 2019. "VANISH regularization for generalized linear models," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 415-437, December.
    20. Lin, L. & Fong, D.K.H., 2019. "Bayesian multidimensional scaling procedure with variable selection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1-13.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2003-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crestfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.