Understanding Performance in Test Taking: The Role of Question Difficulty Order
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.
Other versions of this item:
- Anaya, Lina & Iriberri, Nagore & Rey-Biel, Pedro & Zamarro, Gema, 2022. "Understanding performance in test taking: The role of question difficulty order," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
References listed on IDEAS
- Riener, Gerhard & Wagner, Valentin, 2017. "Shying away from demanding tasks? Experimental evidence on gender differences in answering multiple-choice questions," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 43-62.
- Nagore Iriberri & Pedro Rey-Biel, 2019.
"Competitive Pressure Widens the Gender Gap in Performance: Evidence from a Two-stage Competition in Mathematics,"
The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 129(620), pages 1863-1893.
- Nagore Iriberri & Pedro Rey-Biel, 2016. "Competitive Pressure Widens the Gender Gap in Performance: Evidence from a Two-Stage Competition in Mathematics," Working Papers 879, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Iriberri, Nagore & Rey Biel, Pedro, 2016. "Competitive Pressure Widens the Gender Gap in Performance: Evidence from a Two-Stage Competition in Mathematics," CEPR Discussion Papers 11493, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Pelin Akyol & James Key & Kala Krishna, 2022.
"Hit or Miss? Test Taking Behavior in Multiple Choice Exams,"
Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 147, pages 3-50.
- Ş. Pelin Akyol & James Key & Kala Krishna, 2016. "Hit or Miss? Test Taking Behavior in Multiple Choice Exams," NBER Working Papers 22401, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Riener, Gerhard & Wagner, Valentin, 2018. "Gender differences in willingness to compete and answering multiple-choice questions—The role of age," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 86-89.
- Pekkarinen, Tuomas, 2015. "Gender differences in behaviour under competitive pressure: Evidence on omission patterns in university entrance examinations," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 94-110.
- Claire Duquennois, 2022. "Fictional Money, Real Costs: Impacts of Financial Salience on Disadvantaged Students," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(3), pages 798-826, March.
- Pedro Bordalo & Katherine Coffman & Nicola Gennaioli & Andrei Shleifer, 2019.
"Beliefs about Gender,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(3), pages 739-773, March.
- Pedro Bordalo & Katherine B. Coffman & Nicola Gennaioli & Andrei Shleifer, 2016. "Beliefs about Gender," NBER Working Papers 22972, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Pedro Bordalo & Katie Coffman & Nicola Gennaioli & Andrei Shleifer, 2016. "Beliefs about Gender," Working Paper 478946, Harvard University OpenScholar.
- Pau Balart & Matthijs Oosterveen, 2019. "Females show more sustained performance during test-taking than males," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
- Ben Weidmann & David J. Deming, 2021. "Team Players: How Social Skills Improve Team Performance," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(6), pages 2637-2657, November.
- Katherine B. Coffman & David Klinowski, 2020. "The impact of penalties for wrong answers on the gender gap in test scores," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(16), pages 8794-8803, April.
- Iriberri, Nagore & Rey-Biel, Pedro, 2021.
"Brave boys and play-it-safe girls: Gender differences in willingness to guess in a large scale natural field experiment,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
- Iriberri, Nagore & Rey Biel, Pedro, 2019. "Brave Boys and Play-it-Safe Girls: Gender Differences in Willingness to Guess in a Large Scale Natural Field Experiment," CEPR Discussion Papers 13541, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Perrone, Helena & Funk, Patricia, 2016. "Gender Di erences in Academic Performance: The Role of Negative Marking in Multiple-Choice Exams," CEPR Discussion Papers 11716, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Gema Zamarro & Collin Hitt & Ildefonso Mendez, 2019. "When Students Don’t Care: Reexamining International Differences in Achievement and Student Effort," Journal of Human Capital, University of Chicago Press, vol. 13(4), pages 519-552.
- Katherine Baldiga, 2014. "Gender Differences in Willingness to Guess," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 434-448, February.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Candan Erdemli & Judit Vall Castelló, 2024. "Gender differences in online education," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 349-388, December.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Iriberri, Nagore & Rey-Biel, Pedro, 2021.
"Brave boys and play-it-safe girls: Gender differences in willingness to guess in a large scale natural field experiment,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
- Iriberri, Nagore & Rey Biel, Pedro, 2019. "Brave Boys and Play-it-Safe Girls: Gender Differences in Willingness to Guess in a Large Scale Natural Field Experiment," CEPR Discussion Papers 13541, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Saygin, Perihan O. & Atwater, Ann, 2021. "Gender differences in leaving questions blank on high-stakes standardized tests," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
- Montolio, Daniel & Taberner, Pere A., 2021.
"Gender differences under test pressure and their impact on academic performance: A quasi-experimental design,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 1065-1090.
- Daniel Montolio & Pere A. Taberner, 2018. "Gender differences under test pressure and their impact on academic performance: a quasi-experimental design," Working Papers 2018/21, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
- Griselda, Silvia, 2024. "Gender gap in standardized tests: What are we measuring?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 191-229.
- J. Ignacio Conde-Ruiz & Juan José Ganuza & Manuel García, 2020.
"Gender Gap and Multiple Choice Exams in Public Selection Processes,"
Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 235(4), pages 11-28, December.
- J.I. Conde-Ruiz & J.J. Ganuza & M. García, 2020. "Gender Gap and Multiple Choice Exams in Public Selection Processes," Studies on the Spanish Economy eee2020-07, FEDEA.
- Pau Balart & Lara Ezquerra & Iñigo Hernandez-Arenaz, 2022. "Framing effects on risk-taking behavior: evidence from a field experiment in multiple-choice tests," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(4), pages 1268-1297, September.
- Silvia Griselda, 2020. "Different Questions, Different Gender Gap: Can the Format of Questions Explain the Gender Gap in Mathematics?," 2020 Papers pgr710, Job Market Papers.
- Devereux, Paul J. & Delaney, Judith, 2021.
"Gender and Educational Achievement: Stylized Facts and Causal Evidence,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
15753, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Judith M. Delaney & Paul J. Devereux, 2021. "Gender and Educational Achievement: Stylized Facts and Causal Evidence," Working Papers 202103, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
- Delaney, Judith M. & Devereux, Paul J., 2021. "Gender and Educational Achievement: Stylized Facts and Causal Evidence," IZA Discussion Papers 14074, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Maddalena Davoli, 2023. "A, B, or C? Question Format and the Gender Gap in Financial Literacy," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0206, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
- Jef Vanderoost & Rianne Janssen & Jan Eggermont & Riet Callens & Tinne De Laet, 2018. "Elimination testing with adapted scoring reduces guessing and anxiety in multiple-choice assessments, but does not increase grade average in comparison with negative marking," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, October.
- Espinosa Maria Paz & Gardeazabal Javier, 2020.
"The Gender-bias Effect of Test Scoring and Framing: A Concern for Personnel Selection and College Admission,"
The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(3), pages 1-23, July.
- Espinosa Maria Paz & Gardeazabal Javier, 2020. "The Gender-bias Effect of Test Scoring and Framing: A Concern for Personnel Selection and College Admission," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(3), pages 1-23, July.
- Ballis, Briana & Lusher, Lester & Martorell, Paco, 2022. "The effects of exam frames on student effort and performance," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
- Xavier Ramos & Marcela Gomez-Ruiz & MarÃa Cervini-Plá, 2024.
"Do women fare worse when men are around? Quasi-experimental evidence,"
Working Papers
665, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
- Gomez-Ruiz, Marcela & Cervini-Plá, María & Ramos, Xavier, 2024. "Do Women Fare Worse When Men Are Around? Quasi-Experimental Evidence," IZA Discussion Papers 16782, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Riener, Gerhard & Wagner, Valentin, 2018. "Gender differences in willingness to compete and answering multiple-choice questions—The role of age," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 86-89.
- Heiko Karle & Dirk Engelmann & Martin Peitz, 2022.
"Student performance and loss aversion,"
Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 124(2), pages 420-456, April.
- Karle, Heiko & Engelmann, Dirk & Peitz, Martin, 2019. "Student Performance and Loss Aversion," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 182, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
- Heiko Karle & Dirk Engelmann & Martin Peitz, 2020. "Student Performance and Loss Aversion," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2020_150, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
- Booth, Alison & Lee, Jungmin, 2021.
"Girls’ and boys’ performance in competitions: What we can learn from a Korean quiz show,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 431-447.
- Booth, Alison L. & Lee, Jungmin, 2019. "Girls' and Boys' Performance in Competitions: What We Can Learn from a Korean Quiz Show," IZA Discussion Papers 12182, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Claire Duquennois, 2022. "Fictional Money, Real Costs: Impacts of Financial Salience on Disadvantaged Students," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(3), pages 798-826, March.
- Riener, Gerhard & Wagner, Valentin, 2017. "Shying away from demanding tasks? Experimental evidence on gender differences in answering multiple-choice questions," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 43-62.
- Charness, Gary & Dao, Lien & Shurchkov, Olga, 2022. "Competing now and then: The effects of delay on competitiveness across gender," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 612-630.
- Bottazzi, Laura & Lusardi, Annamaria, 2021.
"Stereotypes in financial literacy: Evidence from PISA,"
Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
- Lusardi, Annamaria & ,, 2020. "Stereotypes in Financial Literacy: Evidence from PISA," CEPR Discussion Papers 15429, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Laura Bottazzi & Annamaria Lusardi, 2020. "Stereotypes in Financial Literacy: Evidence from PISA," NBER Working Papers 28065, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
More about this item
JEL classification:
- C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
- D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
- I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General
- J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.