IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirpro/2020rp-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Baromètre de la confiance des consommateurs québécois à l’égard des aliments -1 re édition

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin
  • Ingrid Peignier

Abstract

The Quebec government's Biofood Policy places consumer expectations and health at the heart of its priorities for the coming years. Offering products that meet consumers' needs is one of the main orientations defined to achieve the ambitions and targets of this policy. In this context, CIRANO's Barometer of Quebec consumers' confidence in food is an important and very useful tool for decision making for the government, but also for all stakeholders in the bio-food sector. Conducted on a regular basis, the Barometer makes it possible to identify trends and take into account the changing context in which Quebecers make food choices. This report is the first edition of the Barometer and provides rich, timely and unprecedented information on a range of issues related to consumer confidence in food. This first edition is based on a survey administered from May 9 to 15, 2019 to a representative sample of 1017 people and is especially useful in order to have a picture of the situation in Quebec in 2019, which will serve as a benchmark for other editions. La Politique bioalimentaire du gouvernement du Québec place les attentes des consommateurs et leur santé au cœur des priorités pour les prochaines années. Offrir des produits répondants aux besoins des consommateurs figure parmi les principales orientations définies pour atteindre les ambitions et les cibles de cette politique. Dans ce contexte, le Baromètre de la confiance des consommateurs québécois à l’égard des aliments du CIRANO est un outil important et très utile à la prise de décisions pour le gouvernement, mais aussi pour l’ensemble des parties prenantes du secteur bioalimentaire. Réalisé sur une base régulière, le Baromètre permet de bien cerner les tendances et de tenir compte de l’évolution du contexte dans lequel les Québécoises et Québécois font des choix en matière d’alimentation. Ce rapport constitue la première édition du Baromètre et fournit des informations riches, opportunes et inédites sur un ensemble d’enjeux reliés au niveau de confiance des consommateurs à l’égard des aliments. Cette première édition est fondée sur une enquête administrée du 9 au 15 mai 2019 auprès d’un échantillon représentatif de 1017 personnes et est surtout utile afin d’avoir une photo de la situation au Québec en 2019, ce qui servira de point de repère pour les autres éditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin & Ingrid Peignier, 2022. "Baromètre de la confiance des consommateurs québécois à l’égard des aliments -1 re édition," CIRANO Project Reports 2020rp-39, CIRANO.
    • Handle: RePEc:cir:cirpro:2020rp-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2020RP-39.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin & Ingrid Peignier, 2012. "Perception des risques au Québec – Baromètre CIRANO 2012," CIRANO Monographs, CIRANO, number 2012mo-02.
    2. Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin & Ingrid Peignier & Yoann Guntzburger, 2018. "The Value of Food Certification and Labels for Consumers in Québec (Canada)," CIRANO Project Reports 2018rp-11, CIRANO.
    3. Paul Slovic & Baruch Fischhoff & Sarah Lichtenstein, 1982. "Why Study Risk Perception?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 83-93, June.
    4. Kriege-Steffen, Astrid & Boland, Hermann & Lohscheidt, Julia & Schneider, Flurina & Stolze, Matthias, 2010. "Transparent Food and Consumer Trust," 2010 International European Forum, February 8-12, 2010, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 100504, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    5. Michelle Bergadaà & Bertrand Urien, 2006. "Le risque alimentaire perçu comme risque vital de consommation. Émergences, adaptation et gestion," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 162(3), pages 127-144.
    6. Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin & Ingrid Peignier, 2017. "Perception des risques au Québec – Baromètre CIRANO 2017," CIRANO Papers 2017n-02a, CIRANO.
    7. Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin & Ingrid Peignier, 2017. "Perception des risques au Québec – Baromètre CIRANO 2017," CIRANO Papers 2017n-02f, CIRANO.
    8. Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin & Ingrid Peignier, 2017. "Perception des risques au Québec – Baromètre CIRANO 2017," CIRANO Monographs, CIRANO, number 2017mo-02.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin & Ingrid Peignier & Yoann Guntzburger, 2018. "The Value of Food Certification and Labels for Consumers in Québec (Canada)," CIRANO Project Reports 2018rp-11, CIRANO.
    2. Joanna Sokolowska & Patrycja Sleboda, 2015. "The Inverse Relation Between Risks and Benefits: The Role of Affect and Expertise," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(7), pages 1252-1267, July.
    3. Marie-Eve Laporte & Géraldine Michel & Sophie Rieunier, 2017. "Towards a better understanding of eating behaviour through the concept of Perception of Nutritional Risk," Post-Print halshs-02923251, HAL.
    4. Lekfuangfu, Warn N., 2022. "Mortality risk, perception, and human capital investments: The legacy of landmines in Cambodia," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Yacov Y. Haimes, 2012. "Systems‐Based Guiding Principles for Risk Modeling, Planning, Assessment, Management, and Communication," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(9), pages 1451-1467, September.
    6. Laura K. Siebeneck & Thomas J. Cova, 2012. "Spatial and Temporal Variation in Evacuee Risk Perception Throughout the Evacuation and Return‐Entry Process," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(9), pages 1468-1480, September.
    7. Henri-Paul Rousseau, 2020. "The Blue Basket: A Tool to FastTrack Quebec’s Digital and Ecological Transition," CIRANO Burgundy Reports 2020rb-07, CIRANO.
    8. Noland, Robert B & Kunreuther, Howard, 1995. "Short-run and long-run policies for increasing bicycle transportation for daily commuter trips," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 67-79, January.
    9. Sandra Cortés & Soledad Burgos & Héctor Adaros & Boris Lucero & Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá, 2021. "Environmental Health Risk Perception: Adaptation of a Population-Based Questionnaire from Latin America," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-13, August.
    10. Andree Ehlert & Jan Seidel & Ursula Weisenfeld, 2020. "Trouble on my mind: the effect of catastrophic events on people’s worries," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 951-975, August.
    11. Branden B. Johnson & Adam M. Finkel, 2016. "Public Perceptions of Regulatory Costs, Their Uncertainty and Interindividual Distribution," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(6), pages 1148-1170, June.
    12. Ophélie Mugel & Madeleine Besson & Patricia Gurviez, 2013. "Le rôle de l’orientation régulatrice chronique sur les représentations du lien santé-alimentation et les comportements alimentaires: une étude exploratoire," Post-Print hal-01385136, HAL.
    13. Meredith Frances Dobbie & Rebekah Ruth Brown, 2014. "A Framework for Understanding Risk Perception, Explored from the Perspective of the Water Practitioner," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 294-308, February.
    14. Andrea Cerase & Lorenzo Cugliari, 2023. "Something Still Remains: Factors Affecting Tsunami Risk Perception on the Coasts Hit by the Reggio Calabria-Messina 1908 Event (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, February.
    15. Sander C. S. Clahsen & Irene van Kamp & Betty C. Hakkert & Theo G. Vermeire & Aldert H. Piersma & Erik Lebret, 2019. "Why Do Countries Regulate Environmental Health Risks Differently? A Theoretical Perspective," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 439-461, February.
    16. P. Marijn Poortvliet & Anne Marike Lokhorst, 2016. "The Key Role of Experiential Uncertainty when Dealing with Risks: Its Relationships with Demand for Regulation and Institutional Trust," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(8), pages 1615-1629, August.
    17. Ao Zhang & Hao Yang & Zhenlei Tian & Shuning Tong, 2022. "Evolution Model and Simulation Study of the Public Risk Perception of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-29, September.
    18. Byoung Joon Kim & Seoyong Kim & Youngcheoul Kang & Sohee Kim, 2022. "Searching for the New Behavioral Model in Energy Transition Age: Analyzing the Forward and Reverse Causal Relationships between Belief, Attitude, and Behavior in Nuclear Policy across Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-24, June.
    19. Liu, Wenjuan & Agusdinata, Datu B. & Eakin, Hallie & Romero, Hugo, 2022. "Sustainable minerals extraction for electric vehicles: A pilot study of consumers’ perceptions of impacts," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    20. Hoehn, John P., 1989. "Consumer Demand for Innovation in Food Safety," Staff Paper Series 201028, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirpro:2020rp-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.