IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chy/respap/93chedp.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The HMQ: measuring health status in the community

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Kind

    (Centre for Health Economics, The University of York)

  • Claire Gudex

Abstract

The measurement of health outcome is central to the evaluation of medical treatment and intervention. In the past, such measurement has been based on data relating to survival and life expectancy. There is now general acknowledgment that a through assessment of the benefits of health care must examine the quality of life, as well as its quantity. The Health Measurement Questionnaire (HMQ) has been developed as a way of collecting self-report information from which a disability/distress rating could be derived on the Rosser Classification of Illness States. This discussion paper provides a fuller review of the data collected as part of a general population survey in which the HMQ was used as a self-report measure of health status alongside the GHQ and the NHP. The HMQ appears to have both construct and convergent validity. It has also discriminated between groups of the population which differ in terms of health status or in the degree of psychiatric morbidity. Several factors have been shown to contribute to overall distress, particularly pain, sadness/depression and dependence on others. It is evident that there is considerable morbidity in the community. These data reinforce the need for continued measurement of health status within the general population, with the dual aim of identifying areas of need, and then monitoring improvement as services are adjusted to meet that need.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Kind & Claire Gudex, 1991. "The HMQ: measuring health status in the community," Working Papers 093chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
  • Handle: RePEc:chy:respap:93chedp
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/discussionpapers/CHE%20Discussion%20Paper%2093.pdf
    File Function: First version, 1991
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kind, Paul & Carr-Hill, Roy, 1987. "The Nottingham health profile: A useful tool for epidemiologists?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 25(8), pages 905-910, January.
    2. Paul Kind, 1988. "The design and construction of quality of life measures," Working Papers 043chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    3. Claire Gudex & Paul Kind, 1988. "The QALY toolkit," Working Papers 038chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    4. Claire Gudex, 1986. "QALYs and their use by the health service," Working Papers 020chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David K. Whynes & Aileen R. Neilson, 1993. "Convergent validity of two measures of the quality of life," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 2(3), pages 229-235, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David K. Whynes & Aileen R. Neilson, 1993. "Convergent validity of two measures of the quality of life," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 2(3), pages 229-235, October.
    2. Fernando San Miguel & Mandy Ryan & Emma McIntosh, 2000. "Applying conjoint analysis in economic evaluations: an application to menorrhagia," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(7), pages 823-833.
    3. Anders Wimo & Bengt Mattsson & Ingvar Krakau & Tua Eriksson & Anders Nelvig, 1994. "Cost‐effectiveness analysis of day care for patients with dementia disorders," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(6), pages 395-404, November.
    4. Claude Le Pen, 1997. "Théorie de l'utilité et mesure des états de santé, le débat QALYs-HYEs," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 129(3), pages 37-54.
    5. Gugushvili, Alexi & Jarosz, Ewa, 2024. "A longitudinal study of perceived social position and health-related quality of life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    6. Mikel Tous-Espelosín & Ilargi Gorostegi-Anduaga & Pablo Corres & Aitor MartinezAguirre-Betolaza & Sara Maldonado-Martín, 2020. "Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life after Different Aerobic Exercise Programs in Physically Inactive Adults with Overweight/Obesity and Primary Hypertension: Data from the EXERDIET-HTA Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Rocco Palumbo, 2017. "Toward a new conceptualization of health care services to inspire public health. Public national health service as a “common pool of resources”," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 14(3), pages 271-287, September.
    8. Crispin Jenkinson, 1990. "Health Status and Mood State in a Migraine Sample," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 36(1), pages 42-48, March.
    9. J. Richardson, 1991. "Economic Assessment of Health Care: Theory and Practice," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 24(1), pages 4-21, January.
    10. MacKillop, Eleanor & Sheard, Sally, 2018. "Quantifying life: Understanding the history of Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 359-366.
    11. Joe Durkan, 1994. "Economic appraisal in health : some conceptual and methodological issues," Open Access publications 10197/1092, School of Economics, University College Dublin.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chy:respap:93chedp. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gill Forder (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/chyoruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.