IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v36y1990i1p42-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Status and Mood State in a Migraine Sample

Author

Listed:
  • Crispin Jenkinson

Abstract

This paper is a report of the results gained from the administration of a health status questionnaire, the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), on a sample of migraine sufferers. It is argued that chronic migraine suffering is an illness that has implications for perceived health status, and that the NHP is sufficiently sensitive to detect this. The results suggest that scores on the domains of Energy, Sleep and Social Relation ships are associated with respondents' mood state as measured on an established psychiatric screening device, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30). It is argued that the NHP has important uses as a survey measure of perceived ill-health in popula tions, and as an indicator of psychiatric morbidity.

Suggested Citation

  • Crispin Jenkinson, 1990. "Health Status and Mood State in a Migraine Sample," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 36(1), pages 42-48, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:36:y:1990:i:1:p:42-48
    DOI: 10.1177/002076409003600105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002076409003600105
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002076409003600105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williams, Simon Johnson, 1989. "Chronic respiratory illness and disability: A critical review of the psychosocial literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 28(8), pages 791-803, January.
    2. Kind, Paul & Carr-Hill, Roy, 1987. "The Nottingham health profile: A useful tool for epidemiologists?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 25(8), pages 905-910, January.
    3. Jenkinson, Crispin & Fitzpatrick, Ray & Argyle, Michael, 1988. "The Nottingham health profile: An analysis of its sensitivity in differentiating illness groups," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 27(12), pages 1411-1414, January.
    4. Williams, Simon J. & Bury, Michael R., 1989. "Impairment, disability and handicap in chronic respiratory illness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 609-616, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David K. Whynes & Aileen R. Neilson, 1993. "Convergent validity of two measures of the quality of life," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 2(3), pages 229-235, October.
    2. Mikel Tous-Espelosín & Ilargi Gorostegi-Anduaga & Pablo Corres & Aitor MartinezAguirre-Betolaza & Sara Maldonado-Martín, 2020. "Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life after Different Aerobic Exercise Programs in Physically Inactive Adults with Overweight/Obesity and Primary Hypertension: Data from the EXERDIET-HTA Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Paul Kind & Claire Gudex, 1991. "The HMQ: measuring health status in the community," Working Papers 093chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    4. Gugushvili, Alexi & Jarosz, Ewa, 2024. "A longitudinal study of perceived social position and health-related quality of life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    5. G. Ardine De Wit & Jan J.V. Busschbach & Frank Th. De Charro, 2000. "Sensitivity and perspective in the valuation of health status: whose values count?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(2), pages 109-126, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:36:y:1990:i:1:p:42-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.