IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/cepdps/dp2021.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Online versus in-person services: Effects on patients and providers

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda Dahlstrand
  • Nestor Le Nestour
  • Guy Michaels

Abstract

Online delivery of one-to-one services offers potential cost savings and increased convenience, yet relatively little is known about its impacts on providers and consumers. This paper studies the online delivery of healthcare, focusing on primary care doctor consultations. We use novel data from Sweden and an effectively random assignment of patients to nurses, who differ in their propensity to direct patients to online versus in-person consultations. Our findings reveal that online consultations are delivered sooner, are shorter, and yield similar in-consultation outcomes, including rates of diagnosis, prescriptions, and specialist referrals, as well as patient satisfaction. However, in the short term, online consultations lead to more emergency department (ED) visits and additional in-person primary care visits, though no significant medium-term health effects are observed. We discuss the extent to which follow-ups reduce online's cost savings, as well as online's advantages for different patients and how to improve hybrid organizations' cost effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda Dahlstrand & Nestor Le Nestour & Guy Michaels, 2024. "Online versus in-person services: Effects on patients and providers," CEP Discussion Papers dp2021, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    • Handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp2021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp2021.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Björn Ekman, 2018. "Cost Analysis of a Digital Health Care Model in Sweden," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 347-354, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ellegård, Lina Maria & Kjellsson, Gustav & Mattisson, Linn, 2021. "An App Call a Day Keeps the Patient Away? Substitution of Online and In-Person Doctor Consultations Among Young Adults," Working Papers in Economics 808, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics, revised May 2022.
    2. Cecilia Dahlgren & Emma Spånberg & Sofia Sveréus & Margareta Dackehag & Per Wändell & Clas Rehnberg, 2024. "Short- and intermediate-term impact of DTC telemedicine consultations on subsequent healthcare consumption," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(1), pages 157-176, February.
    3. Michela Franchini & Massimiliano Salvatori & Francesca Denoth & Sabrina Molinaro & Stefania Pieroni, 2022. "Participation in Low Back Pain Management: It Is Time for the To-Be Scenarios in Digital Public Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-18, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    telehealth; remote work; online services;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J44 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Professional Labor Markets and Occupations
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp2021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/discussion-papers/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.