IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v2y2018i3d10.1007_s41669-017-0059-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost Analysis of a Digital Health Care Model in Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Björn Ekman

    (Lund University)

Abstract

Background Digital technologies in health care are expected to increase in scope and to affect ever more parts of the health care system. It is important to enhance the knowledge of whether new digital methods and innovations provide value for money compared with traditional models of care. Objective The objective of the study was to evaluate whether a digital health care model for primary care is a less costly alternative compared with traditional in-office primary care in Sweden. Methods Cost data for the two care models were collected and analyzed to obtain a measure in local currency per care contact. Results The comparison showed that the total economic cost of a digital consultation is 1960 Swedish krona (SEK) (SEK100 = US$11.29; February 2017) compared with SEK3348 for a traditional consultation at a health care clinic. Cost differences arose on both the provider side and on the user side. Conclusion The digital health care model may be a less costly alternative to the traditional health care model. Depending on the rate of digital substitution, gross economic cost savings of between SEK1 billion and SEK10 billion per year could be realized if more digital consultations were made. Further studies are needed to validate the findings, assess the types of care most suitable for digital care, and also to obtain various quality-adjusted outcome measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Björn Ekman, 2018. "Cost Analysis of a Digital Health Care Model in Sweden," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 347-354, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:2:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s41669-017-0059-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-017-0059-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-017-0059-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-017-0059-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ellegård, Lina Maria & Kjellsson, Gustav & Mattisson, Linn, 2021. "An App Call a Day Keeps the Patient Away? Substitution of Online and In-Person Doctor Consultations Among Young Adults," Working Papers in Economics 808, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics, revised May 2022.
    2. Cecilia Dahlgren & Emma Spånberg & Sofia Sveréus & Margareta Dackehag & Per Wändell & Clas Rehnberg, 2024. "Short- and intermediate-term impact of DTC telemedicine consultations on subsequent healthcare consumption," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(1), pages 157-176, February.
    3. Michela Franchini & Massimiliano Salvatori & Francesca Denoth & Sabrina Molinaro & Stefania Pieroni, 2022. "Participation in Low Back Pain Management: It Is Time for the To-Be Scenarios in Digital Public Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Amanda Dahlstrand & Nestor Le Nestour & Guy Michaels, 2024. "Online versus In-Person Services: Effects on Patients and Providers," CESifo Working Paper Series 11250, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:2:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s41669-017-0059-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.