IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v25y2024i1d10.1007_s10198-023-01572-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Short- and intermediate-term impact of DTC telemedicine consultations on subsequent healthcare consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Cecilia Dahlgren

    (Karolinska Institutet
    Region Stockholm, Center for Health Economics, Informatics and Healthcare Research)

  • Emma Spånberg

    (Karolinska Institutet
    Region Dalarna, Department of Analysis)

  • Sofia Sveréus

    (Karolinska Institutet
    Region Stockholm, Center for Health Economics, Informatics and Healthcare Research)

  • Margareta Dackehag

    (Lund University)

  • Per Wändell

    (Karolinska Institutet)

  • Clas Rehnberg

    (Karolinska Institutet)

Abstract

Aim The use of direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine consultations in primary healthcare has increased rapidly, in Sweden and internationally. Such consultations may be a low-cost alternative to face-to-face visits, but there is limited evidence on their effects on overall healthcare consumption. The aim of this study was to assess the short- and intermediate-term impact of DTC telemedicine consultations on subsequent primary healthcare consumption, by comparing DTC telemedicine users to matched controls in a Swedish setting. Methods We constructed a database with individual-level data on healthcare consumption, for all residents of Region Stockholm in 2018, by linking national and regional registries. The study population included all individuals who had ≥ 1 physician consultation (telemedicine or face-to-face) during the first half of 2018. DTC telemedicine users were matched 1:2 to controls who were non-users of DTC telemedicine but who had a traditional face-to-face consultation during the study period. The matching criteria were diagnosis and demographic and socioeconomic variables. An interrupted time series analysis was performed to compare the healthcare consumption of DTC telemedicine users to that of the control group. Results DTC telemedicine users increased their healthcare consumption more than controls. The effect seemed to be mostly short term (within a month), but was also present at the intermediate term (2–6 months after the initial consultation). The results were robust across age and disease groups. Conclusion The results indicate that DTC telemedicine consultations increase the total number of physician consultations in primary healthcare. From a policy perspective, it is therefore important to further investigate for which diagnoses and treatments DTC telemedicine is suitable so that its use can be encouraged when it is most cost-efficient and limited when it is not. Given the fundamentally different models for reimbursement, there are reasons to review and possibly harmonise the incentive structures for DTC telemedicine and traditional primary healthcare.

Suggested Citation

  • Cecilia Dahlgren & Emma Spånberg & Sofia Sveréus & Margareta Dackehag & Per Wändell & Clas Rehnberg, 2024. "Short- and intermediate-term impact of DTC telemedicine consultations on subsequent healthcare consumption," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(1), pages 157-176, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:25:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10198-023-01572-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01572-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-023-01572-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-023-01572-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Livio Garattini & Marco Badinella Martini & Michele Zanetti, 2021. "More room for telemedicine after COVID-19: lessons for primary care?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(2), pages 183-186, March.
    2. Hessam Bavafa & Lorin M. Hitt & Christian Terwiesch, 2018. "The Impact of E-Visits on Visit Frequencies and Patient Health: Evidence from Primary Care," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(12), pages 5461-5480, December.
    3. Björn Ekman, 2018. "Cost Analysis of a Digital Health Care Model in Sweden," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 347-354, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ellegård, Lina Maria & Kjellsson, Gustav & Mattisson, Linn, 2021. "An App Call a Day Keeps the Patient Away? Substitution of Online and In-Person Doctor Consultations Among Young Adults," Working Papers in Economics 808, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics, revised May 2022.
    2. Cannavacciuolo, Lorella & Capaldo, Guido & Ponsiglione, Cristina, 2023. "Digital innovation and organizational changes in the healthcare sector: Multiple case studies of telemedicine project implementation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Karolina Pogorzelska & Ludmila Marcinowicz & Slawomir Chlabicz, 2023. "A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Physicians’ Experiences with Telemedicine during the COVID-19 Pandemic in North-Eastern Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Amanda Dahlstrand & Nestor Le Nestour & Guy Michaels, 2024. "Online versus In-Person Services: Effects on Patients and Providers," CESifo Working Paper Series 11250, CESifo.
    5. Hessam Bavafa & Sergei Savin & Christian Terwiesch, 2021. "Customizing Primary Care Delivery Using E‐Visits," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4306-4327, November.
    6. Tom Fangyun Tan & Serguei Netessine, 2020. "At Your Service on the Table: Impact of Tabletop Technology on Restaurant Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4496-4515, October.
    7. Tomer Geva & Maytal Saar‐Tsechansky, 2021. "Who Is a Better Decision Maker? Data‐Driven Expert Ranking Under Unobserved Quality," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(1), pages 127-144, January.
    8. Xiao Yu & Armagan Bayram, 2021. "Managing capacity for virtual and office appointments in chronic care," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 742-767, December.
    9. Diwas Singh KC & Stefan Scholtes & Christian Terwiesch, 2020. "Empirical Research in Healthcare Operations: Past Research, Present Understanding, and Future Opportunities," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 73-83, January.
    10. Foglia, Emanuela & Garagiola, Elisabetta & Bellavia, Daniele & Rossetto, Federica & Baglio, Francesca, 2024. "Digital technology and COVID-19 pandemic: Feasibility and acceptance of an innovative telemedicine platform," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    11. Matias Busso & Maria P. Gonzalez & Carlos Scartascini, 2022. "On the demand for telemedicine: Evidence from the COVID‐19 pandemic," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(7), pages 1491-1505, July.
    12. Guoliang Frank Jiang & Jeffrey J. Reuer & Colette Southam & Paul W. Beamish, 2022. "The impact of initial public offerings on SMEs’ foreign investment decisions," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(5), pages 879-901, July.
    13. Necati Ertekin & Mehmet Gümüş & Mohammad E. Nikoofal, 2022. "Online-Exclusive or Hybrid? Channel Merchandising Strategies for Ship-to-Store Implementation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 5828-5846, August.
    14. Saligrama Agnihothri & Leon Cui & Mohammad Delasay & Balaraman Rajan, 2020. "The value of mHealth for managing chronic conditions," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 185-202, June.
    15. Sungwook Yoon & Duk Bin Jun & Sungho Park, 2020. "The effect of general health checks on healthcare utilization: accounting for self‐selection bias," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(1), pages 3-36, January.
    16. Chen Chen & Dylan Walker, 2023. "A Bitter Pill to Swallow? The Consequences of Patient Evaluation in Online Health Question-and-Answer Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 867-889, September.
    17. Kraig Delana & Sarang Deo & Kamalini Ramdas & Ganesh-Babu B. Subburaman & Thulasiraj Ravilla, 2023. "Multichannel Delivery in Healthcare: The Impact of Telemedicine Centers in Southern India," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 2568-2586, May.
    18. Chakraborty, Imon & Ilavarasan, P. Vigneswara & Edirippulige, Sisira, 2021. "Health-tech startups in healthcare service delivery: A scoping review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    19. Ni Huang & Zhijun Yan & Haonan Yin, 2021. "Effects of Online–Offline Service Integration on e‐Healthcare Providers: A Quasi‐Natural Experiment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(8), pages 2359-2378, August.
    20. Christian Terwiesch, 2019. "OM Forum—Empirical Research in Operations Management: From Field Studies to Analyzing Digital Exhaust," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 713-722, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Telemedicine; e-health; Primary healthcare; Healthcare consumption; Interrupted time series analysis; Sweden;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:25:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10198-023-01572-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.