IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/cepdps/dp0249.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Patterns of Employee Particpation and Industrial Democracy in UK ESOPs

Author

Listed:
  • J McDonald
  • A Pendleton
  • A Robinson
  • N Wilson

Abstract

This paper examines the institutional characteristics of UK ESOPs and considers the extent to which ESOPs extend employee participation and industrial democracy. It is suggested that ESOPs in themselves do not extend industrial democracy. Instead patterns of employee participation are substantially determined by the goals of those primarily responsible for establishing the ESOP. Three constellations of ESOPs are discerned on the basis of their participative characteristics: `technical ESOPs' where there is little or no development of industrial democracy; `paternalist ESOPs' which tend to develop individualistic forms of employee participation; and `representative ESOPs' where new institutions are created to give some opportunity for involvement of employee representatives in top decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • J McDonald & A Pendleton & A Robinson & N Wilson, 1995. "Patterns of Employee Particpation and Industrial Democracy in UK ESOPs," CEP Discussion Papers dp0249, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    • Handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/DP0249.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Turnbull & Syd Weston, 1993. "Co-operation or Control? Capital Restructuring and Labour Relations on the Docks," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 31(1), pages 115-134, March.
    2. P Dewe & S Dunn & R Richardson, 1991. "The Impact of Employee Share Ownership on Worker Attitudes. A Longitudinal Case Study," CEP Discussion Papers dp0024, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    3. Patrick Michael Rooney, 1988. "Worker Participation in Employee-Owned Firms," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 451-458, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pendleton, A. & McDonald, J. & Robinson, A. & Wilson, N., 1995. "Patterns of employee participation and industrial democracy in UK ESOPs," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20717, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Derek C. Jones & Srecko Goic, 2010. "Do innovative workplace practices foster mutual gains? Evidence from Croatia," Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory & Labor-Managed Firms, in: Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory & Labor-Managed Firms, pages 23-68, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    3. Peter Turnbull & Victoria Wass, 1994. "The Greatest Game no more - Redundant Dockers and the Demise of `Dock Work'," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 8(4), pages 487-506, December.
    4. Cheon, SangHyun, 2007. "World Port Institutions and Productivity: Roles of Ownership, Corporate Structure, and Inter-port Competition," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7t64h5wr, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Cullinane, Kevin & Ji, Ping & Wang, Teng-fei, 2005. "The relationship between privatization and DEA estimates of efficiency in the container port industry," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(5), pages 433-462.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/discussion-papers/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.