IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v8y1994i4p487-506.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Greatest Game no more - Redundant Dockers and the Demise of `Dock Work'

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Turnbull

    (School of Business and Economic Studies at the University of Leeds)

  • Victoria Wass

    (Cardiff Business School, University of Wales College of Cardiff)

Abstract

Prior to the abolition of the National Dock Labour Scheme (NDLS) in July 1989, registered dock workers had good jobs. This was the result, first and foremost, of militant solidarity on the part of dock workers and, of course, the NDLS, which was itself a principal outcome of organised struggle. Deregulation post-1989 has transformed `dock work' to such an extent that the industry no longer offers the kind of extrinsic or intrinsic rewards enjoyed by dockers in the past; but the restructuring of the industry was only made possible by the mass redundancy of ex-registered dockers, in particular trade union activists. It was redundancy, in conjunction with the abolition of the NDLS, that led to the demise of what was once the `greatest game in the world'.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Turnbull & Victoria Wass, 1994. "The Greatest Game no more - Redundant Dockers and the Demise of `Dock Work'," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 8(4), pages 487-506, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:8:y:1994:i:4:p:487-506
    DOI: 10.1177/095001709484001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/095001709484001
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/095001709484001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Turnbull & Syd Weston, 1993. "Co-operation or Control? Capital Restructuring and Labour Relations on the Docks," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 31(1), pages 115-134, March.
    2. MacKay, D I, 1972. "After the 'Shake-out.'," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 89-110, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pendleton, A. & McDonald, J. & Robinson, A. & Wilson, N., 1995. "Patterns of employee participation and industrial democracy in UK ESOPs," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20717, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. J McDonald & A Pendleton & A Robinson & N Wilson, 1995. "Patterns of Employee Particpation and Industrial Democracy in UK ESOPs," CEP Discussion Papers dp0249, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    3. Cheon, SangHyun, 2007. "World Port Institutions and Productivity: Roles of Ownership, Corporate Structure, and Inter-port Competition," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7t64h5wr, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Phillip B. Beaumont, 1976. "Assisted Labour Mobility Policy in Scotland 1973-19741," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 13(1), pages 75-79, February.
    5. Cullinane, Kevin & Ji, Ping & Wang, Teng-fei, 2005. "The relationship between privatization and DEA estimates of efficiency in the container port industry," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(5), pages 433-462.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:8:y:1994:i:4:p:487-506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.