IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt8cx9j5vg.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The External Damage Cost of Direct Noise From Motor Vehicles

Author

Listed:
  • Delucchi, Mark A.
  • Hsu, Shi-Ling

Abstract

In many urban areas, noise is a serious problem. Noise disturbs sleep, disrupts activities, hinders work, impedes learning, and causes stress (Linster, 1990). Indeed, surveys often find that noise is the most common disturbance in the home (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD], 1988). And motor vehicles usually are the primary source of that noise (OECD, 1988)1. Noise is a prominent enough problem that it measurably affects the value of homes. Econometric or “hedonic” price analyses measure this effect by estimating the sales price of a house as a function of a number of important characteristics, including the ambient noise level or distance from a major noise source (Nelson, 1978; Hall and Welland, 1987; O’Byrne et al., 1985). If such an analysis does not omit important determinants of sales price, it can tell us how much an additional decibel of noise (above a certain threshold) reduces the value of a home2. This $/decibel measure, multiplied by the average value of homes, the number of homes exposed to noise above a threshold, and the amount of motor-vehicle noise above a threshold, will tell us the external “damage cost” of motor-vehicle noise in and around the home. The cost of noise in and around the home then can be scaled by the ratio of time spent in all activities affected by motor-vehicle noise to time spent in or around the home, to produce the total external damage cost of motor-vehicle noise. In this report, we present such a model of the total external damage cost of direct motor-vehicle noise in the U. S.3. We find that the external damage cost of direct motor-vehicle noise could range from as little as $100 million per year to approximately $40 billion per year (1990 data, 1991$), although we believe that the cost is not likely to exceed $5 billion. In sensitivity analyses presented at the end of the report, we show that this wide range is due primarily to uncertainty regarding the cost of noise per decibel above a threshold, the interest rate, the amount of noise attenuation due to ground cover and intervening structures, the threshold level below which damages are assumed to be zero, the density of housing alongside roads, average traffic speeds, and the cost of noise outside of the home.

Suggested Citation

  • Delucchi, Mark A. & Hsu, Shi-Ling, 1996. "The External Damage Cost of Direct Noise From Motor Vehicles," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt8cx9j5vg, University of California Transportation Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt8cx9j5vg
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8cx9j5vg.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melville L. McMillan & Bradford G. Reid & David W. Gillen, 1980. "An Extension of the Hedonic Approach for Estimating the Value of Quiet," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 56(3), pages 315-328.
    2. Verhoef, Erik, 1994. "External effects and social costs of road transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 273-287, July.
    3. Kenneth Button, 1993. "Transport, The Environment And Economic Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. E T Verhoef & J C J M van den Bergh & K J Button, 1997. "Transport, Spatial Economy, and the Global Environment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 29(7), pages 1195-1213, July.
    2. Forkenbrock, David J., 1999. "External costs of intercity truck freight transportation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 505-526.
    3. Rita Prior Filipe & Andrew Heath & Nick McCullen, 2024. "The Distribution of the Economic Impacts of Sustainable Regional Transport Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Celia Bilbao-Terol, 2009. "Impacts of an Iron and Steel Plant on Residential Property Values," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1421-1436, September.
    5. Ngee-Choon Chia & Albert K C Tsui & John Whalley, 2003. "Taxes and Traffic in Asian Cities: Ownership and use taxes on Autos in Singapore," University of Western Ontario, Departmental Research Report Series 20035, University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics.
    6. D’Alfonso, Tiziana & Jiang, Changmin & Bracaglia, Valentina, 2016. "Air transport and high-speed rail competition: Environmental implications and mitigation strategies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 261-276.
    7. Anders Skonhoft & Bjart Holtsmark, 2014. "The Norwegian support and subsidy of electric cars. Should it be adopted by other countries?," Working Paper Series 15814, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
    8. Damart, Sébastien & Roy, Bernard, 2009. "The uses of cost-benefit analysis in public transportation decision-making in France," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 200-212, August.
    9. Konkoly, Attila, 1996. "Development of a price visualization procedure of cash grain markets using GIS," ISU General Staff Papers 1996010108000017634, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    10. Fumitoshi Mizutani & Yusuke Suzuki & Shuji Uranishi, 2017. "Magnitude of external costs of highways in Japan," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 337-357, October.
    11. Delucchi, Mark, 2007. "Do Motor-Vehicle Users in the US Pay Their Way?," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt5841z3kx, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    12. Assunta Di Vaio & Luisa Varriale, 2018. "Management Innovation for Environmental Sustainability in Seaports: Managerial Accounting Instruments and Training for Competitive Green Ports beyond the Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-35, March.
    13. Jochem, Patrick & Doll, Claus & Fichtner, Wolf, 2016. "External costs of electric vehicles," MPRA Paper 91602, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Noëlvia Sedoarisoa & Didier Desponds & Laurent Dalmas & Catherine Lavandier, 2017. "Housing prices and the proximity of the Paris -Charles- de-Gaulle (CDG) airport [Prix de l’immobilier et proximité de la plate-forme aéroportuaire de Paris – Charles-de-Gaulle (CDG)]," Post-Print hal-02526101, HAL.
    15. Delucchi, Mark & Kurani, Ken, 2010. "How We Can Have Safe, Clean, Convenient, Affordable, Pleasant Transportation Without Making People Drive Less or Give Up Suburban Living," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0x92n7rg, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    16. Kopsch, Fredrik, 2016. "The cost of aircraft noise – Does it differ from road noise? A meta-analysis," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 138-142.
    17. Delucchi, Mark A., 1997. "The Annualized Social Cost of Motor-Vehicle Use in the U.S., 1990-1991: Summary of Theory, Data, Methods, and Results," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt43s6n28v, University of California Transportation Center.
    18. Alcaraz Carrillo de Albornoz, Vicente & Molina Millán, Juan & Lara Galera, Antonio & Muñoz Medina, Belén, 2022. "Road speed limit matters – Are politicians doing the right thing?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Delucchi, Mark A., 1998. "The Annualized Social Cost of Motor-Vehicle Use in the US: Summary of Theory, Data, Methods, and Results: Report #1 in the series: The Annualized Social Cost of Motor-Vehicle Use in the United States,," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4tt4d75f, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    20. Button, Kenneth, 1994. "The Impacts of Transport What Can We Learn Using Meta-analysis?," Transportation Research Forum Proceedings 1990s 319112, Transportation Research Forum.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt8cx9j5vg. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.