IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt2ws1x83f.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Incorporating Residential Choice into Travel Behavior-Land Use Interaction Research: A Conceptual Model with Methodologies for Investigating Causal Relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Bagley, Michael N

Abstract

This dissertation investigates the factors that influence an individual's residential choice. The role that residential choice plays in other individual decisions is also investigated, with an emphasis placed on understanding the importance of land use configuration on individual travel demand. To achieve this, a conceptual model of residential choice/preference was developed that was a comprehensive reflection of those relationships supported by the literature and by informed judgment. The complexity of this model is seen in the many interdependent relationships that involve residential choice. For example, in choosing a place to live, a household may evaluate a dwelling unit and/or neighborhood according to how it fits along several interrelated dimensions, such as: housing type, neighborhood type, distance to work, distance to shopping and other household-related activities, type of mode to work and car ownership. The measurement of neighborhood type as a continuous variable through factor analysis was another important part of this work. A two-factor disaggregate solution representing traditional and suburban neighborhood dimensions was used in this study. This approach allowed for a single area to possess attributes of both types of neighborhoods, and allowed individuals within the same area to face different neighborhood characteristics - a flexibility amply justified by the empirical results. Further, it has the statistical advantage of producing continuous measures of endogenous variables, a trait that is desirable in both regression and structural equation models. The data analyzed in this study came from 852 individuals from five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Information such as trip records, life style preferences, and attitudes towards urban transportation, housing and the environment, were incorporated with household demographic and socio-economic data to perform multivariate statistical analyses of an individual's residential choice. Specifically, three different sets of models were estimated: 1) a binary model of residential choice (adjusted ? = 0.52), where residential choice alternatives include suburb (=1) and traditional (=0), 2) single-equation regression models of elements in the conceptual model (with adjusted R2 values ranging from 0.39 for residential choice = traditional to 0.02 for travel demand = daily walk/bike miles rate, and 3) structural equation models (with good model fit indices such as the relative fit index = 0.913) A particularly noteworthy finding supported by all of the models referred to above is that attitude and lifestyle variables play the greatest role in explaining residential choice and travel demand. Results suggest that the association commonly observed between neighborhood type and travel patterns is not one of the direct causality, but due to correlations of each of those variables with others. In particular, is believed that when attitudinal, lifestyle, and sociodemographic variables are accounted for, neighborhood type has very little influence on travel behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Bagley, Michael N, 1999. "Incorporating Residential Choice into Travel Behavior-Land Use Interaction Research: A Conceptual Model with Methodologies for Investigating Causal Relationships," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2ws1x83f, University of California Transportation Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt2ws1x83f
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2ws1x83f.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nijkamp, Peter & Van Wissen, Leo & Rima, Annemarie, 1993. "A household life cycle model for residential relocation behaviour," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 35-53, March.
    2. Kitamura, Ryuichi & Laidet, Laura & Mokhtarian, Patricia L & Buckinger, Carol & Gianelli, Fred, 1994. "Land Use and Travel Behavior," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4k88522t, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Mokhtarian, Patricia L. & Salomon, Ilan, 1997. "Modeling the Desire to Telecommute: The Importance of Attitudinal Factors in Behavioral Models," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt29z267km, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Moshe Ben-Akiva & John L. Bowman, 1998. "Integration of an Activity-based Model System and a Residential Location Model," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(7), pages 1131-1153, June.
    5. M Menchik, 1972. "Residential Environmental Preferences and Choice: Empirically Validating Preference Measures," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 4(4), pages 445-458, December.
    6. Dubin, Robin A., 1985. "Transportation costs and the residential location decision: A new approach," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 58-72, January.
    7. Hamilton, Bruce W, 1982. "Wasteful Commuting," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 90(5), pages 1035-1051, October.
    8. M Los & S Nguyen, 1983. "Solution Algorithms for a Combined Residential Location and Transportation Model," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 15(4), pages 515-524, April.
    9. J.F. Kain & J.M. Quigley, 1970. "Evaluating the Quality of the Residential Environment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 2(1), pages 23-32, March.
    10. J L Onaka, 1983. "A Multiple-Attribute Housing Disequilibrium Model of Residential Mobility," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 15(6), pages 751-765, June.
    11. Marlon G. Boarnet & Sharon Sarmiento, 1998. "Can Land-use Policy Really Affect Travel Behaviour? A Study of the Link between Non-work Travel and Land-use Characteristics," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(7), pages 1155-1169, June.
    12. Cheol-Joo Cho, 1997. "Joint Choice of Tenure and Dwelling Type: A Multinomial Logit Analysis for the City of Chongju," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(9), pages 1459-1473, August.
    13. Handy, Susan, 1993. "Regional Versus Local Accessibility: Implications for Nonwork Travel," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2z79q67d, University of California Transportation Center.
    14. Quigley, John M., 1985. "Consumer choice of dwelling, neighborhood and public services," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 41-63, February.
    15. Giuliano, Genevieve, 1989. "New Directions for Understanding Transportation and Land Use," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt72f0362d, University of California Transportation Center.
    16. Roell, Ailsa, 1982. "Wasteful Commuting: Appendix," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 90(5), pages 1052-1053, October.
    17. Ryan, S. & McNally, M. G., 1995. "Accessibility of neotraditional neighborhoods: A review of design concepts, policies, and recent literature," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 87-105, March.
    18. Mokhtarian, Patricia L. & Salomon, Ilan, 1997. "Modeling the desire to telecommute: The importance of attitudinal factors in behavioral models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 35-50, January.
    19. Cervero, Robert, 1996. "Mixed land-uses and commuting: Evidence from the American Housing Survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 361-377, September.
    20. Cullinane, Sharon, 1992. "Attitudes towards the car in the U.K.: Some implications for policies on congestion and the environment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 291-301, July.
    21. I Salomon & M Ben-Akiva, 1983. "The Use of the Life-Style Concept in Travel Demand Models," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 15(5), pages 623-638, May.
    22. H Timmermans & A Borgers & J van Dijk & H Oppewal, 1992. "Residential Choice Behaviour of Dual Earner Households: A Decompositional Joint Choice Model," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(4), pages 517-533, April.
    23. Andrejs Skaburskis, 1997. "Gender Differences in Housing Demand," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(2), pages 275-320, February.
    24. K J Veldhuisen & H J P Timmermans, 1984. "Specification of Individual Residential Utility Functions: A Comparative Analysis of Three Measurement Procedures," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 16(12), pages 1573-1582, December.
    25. Blumenberg, Evelyn & Ong, Paul, 1997. "Can Welfare Recipients Afford to Work Far from Home?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4xb4s0wh, University of California Transportation Center.
    26. Prevedouros, Panos D., 1992. "Associations of personality characteristics with transport behavior and residence location decisions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 381-391, September.
    27. Cervero, Robert & Radisch, Carolyn, 1996. "Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 127-141, July.
    28. D A Hensher & A K Taylor, 1983. "Intraurban Residential Relocation Choices for Students: An Empirical Inquiry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 15(6), pages 815-830, June.
    29. A G Houghton, 1971. "The Simulation and Evaluation of Housing Location," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 3(4), pages 383-394, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Van Acker, Véronique & Mulley, Corinne & Ho, Loan, 2019. "Impact of childhood experiences on public transport travel behaviour," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 783-798.
    2. Michael N. Bagley & Patricia L. Mokhtarian & Ryuichi Kitamura, 2002. "A Methodology for the Disaggregate, Multidimensional Measurement of Residential Neighbourhood Type," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(4), pages 689-704, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael N. Bagley & Patricia L. Mokhtarian & Ryuichi Kitamura, 2002. "A Methodology for the Disaggregate, Multidimensional Measurement of Residential Neighbourhood Type," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(4), pages 689-704, April.
    2. Crane, Randall & Crepeau, Richard, 1998. "Does Neighborhood Design Influence Travel?: Behavioral Analysis of Travel Diary and GIS Data," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4pj4s7t8, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Luz, Gregório & Barboza, Matheus H.C. & Portugal, Licinio & Giannotti, Mariana & van Wee, Bert, 2022. "Does better accessibility help to reduce social exclusion? Evidence from the city of São Paulo, Brazil," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 186-217.
    4. Luz, Gregorio & Barboza, Matheus Henrique Cunha & da Silva Portugal, Licinio & Giannotti, Mariana & van Wee, Bert, 2022. "Does better accessibility help to reduce social exclusion? Evidence from the City of São Paulo, Brazil," SocArXiv 2p896, Center for Open Science.
    5. Cao, Xinyu, 2006. "The Causal Relationship between the Built Environment and Personal Travel Choice: Evidence from Northern California," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt07q5p340, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Mokhtarian, Patricia L & Salomon, Ilan, 1998. "What Happens When Mobility-Inclined Market Segments Face Accessibility-Enhancing Policies?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9ns6v74t, University of California Transportation Center.
    7. Jen-Jia Lin & An-Tsei Yang, 2009. "Structural Analysis of How Urban Form Impacts Travel Demand: Evidence from Taipei," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(9), pages 1951-1967, August.
    8. Yusak O. Susilo & Chengxi Liu & Maria Börjesson, 2019. "The changes of activity-travel participation across gender, life-cycle, and generations in Sweden over 30 years," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 793-818, June.
    9. Cao, XinYu, 2007. "The Causal Relationship between the Built Environment and Personal Travel Choice: Evidence from Northern California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1n90z8h8, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    10. Etminani-Ghasrodashti, Roya & Ardeshiri, Mahyar, 2015. "Modeling travel behavior by the structural relationships between lifestyle, built environment and non-working trips," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 506-518.
    11. Rahul, T.M. & Verma, Ashish, 2017. "The influence of stratification by motor-vehicle ownership on the impact of built environment factors in Indian cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 40-51.
    12. Patricia L. Mokhtarian, 1998. "A Synthetic Approach to Estimating the Impacts of Telecommuting on Travel," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(2), pages 215-241, February.
    13. Susilo, Yusak & Liu, Chengxi & Börjesson, Maria, 2018. "The changes of activity-travel participation across gender, life-cycle, and generations in Sweden over 30 years," Working papers in Transport Economics 2018:8, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    14. Veronique Acker & Frank Witlox, 2011. "Commuting trips within tours: how is commuting related to land use?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 465-486, May.
    15. Cervero, Robert & Duncan, Michael, 2008. "Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: Jobs-Housing Balauce or Retail-Housing Mixing?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1s110395, University of California Transportation Center.
    16. Cao, Xinyu (Jason) & Mokhtarian, Patricia L. & Handy, Susan L., 2009. "The relationship between the built environment and nonwork travel: A case study of Northern California," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 548-559, June.
    17. Cervero, Robert & Duncan, Michael, 2006. "Balanced Growth, Travel Demand, and Physical Activity," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5c95t59t, University of California Transportation Center.
    18. Zhu, Pengyu & Zhao, Songnian & Jiang, Yanpeng, 2022. "Residential segregation, built environment and commuting outcomes: Experience from contemporary China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 269-277.
    19. Galit Cohen-Blankshtain & Peter Nijkamp & Kees van Montfort, 2004. "Modelling ICT Perceptions and Views of Urban Front-liners," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(13), pages 2647-2667, December.
    20. Redmond, Lothlorien, 2000. "Identifying and Analyzing Travel-Related Attitudinal, Personality, and Lifestyle Clusters in the San Francisco Bay Area," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0317h7v4, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt2ws1x83f. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.