IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cam/camdae/2421.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Renewable Integration: The Role of Market Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Davi-Arderius, D.
  • Jamasb, T.
  • Rosellon, J.

Abstract

The 2022 energy crisis highlighted the dependence of Europe electricity sector on imported gas and the need to accelerate the connection of renewables to the power system. However, the allocation of generation and demand in electricity markets is not always technically viable and, where needed, system operators must activate or curtail specific generators not cleared in the day-ahead markets to ensure system reliability. This is a well-known operational, but under-researched, issue related to high integration of renewables. In Spain, most activated units are combined cycle or coal, while an equivalent volume of scheduled renewables (wind) must be curtailed to balance generation and consumption. Most of these actions are not used to alleviate congestion or grid bottlenecks, but to ensure system stability which highlights new challenges, but little empirically analyzed, in efficient integration of renewables. These actions impact on social welfare since all customers bear the costs of these actions, resulting in additional gas imports and CO2 emissions. We estimate how these actions could evolve under different scenarios. We find that additional renewables have increased the costs and CO2 emissions related to network operational needs. Moreover, the installation of small generation behind the meter might become a regressive policy since all customers will bear the additional operational costs. Finally, higher electricity consumption decreases the costs of solving operational needs, which highlights another social welfare benefit associated with the electrification of demand. Until the renewable or storage technologies evolve further, conventional generators (coal, combined cycle or nuclear) are needed for safe operation of systems with high rate of renewables, and countries need to assess when they disconnect them from the network.

Suggested Citation

  • Davi-Arderius, D. & Jamasb, T. & Rosellon, J., 2024. "Renewable Integration: The Role of Market Conditions," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2421, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
  • Handle: RePEc:cam:camdae:2421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/research-files/repec/cam/pdf/cwpe2421.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simone Borghesi & Sergio Vergalli, 2022. "The European Green Deal, Energy Transition and Decarbonization," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(1), pages 1-3, September.
    2. Anaya, Karim L. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2020. "Reactive power procurement: A review of current trends," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    3. Janda, Karel & Málek, Jan & Rečka, Lukáš, 2017. "Influence of renewable energy sources on transmission networks in Central Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 524-537.
    4. Poplavskaya, Ksenia & Totschnig, Gerhard & Leimgruber, Fabian & Doorman, Gerard & Etienne, Gilles & de Vries, Laurens, 2020. "Integration of day-ahead market and redispatch to increase cross-border exchanges in the European electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    5. Keele, Luke & Kelly, Nathan J., 2006. "Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 186-205, April.
    6. Kwiatkowski, Denis & Phillips, Peter C. B. & Schmidt, Peter & Shin, Yongcheol, 1992. "Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root : How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 54(1-3), pages 159-178.
    7. Davi-Arderius, Daniel & Jamasb, Tooraj & Rosellon, Juan, 2024. "Network Operation and Constraints and the Path to Net Zero," Working Papers 8-2024, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
    8. Staudt, Philipp & Oren, Shmuel S., 2021. "Merchant transmission in single-price electricity markets with cost-based redispatch," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    9. Ambrosius, Mirjam & Egerer, Jonas & Grimm, Veronika & van der Weijde, Adriaan H., 2022. "Risk aversion in multilevel electricity market models with different congestion pricing regimes," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    10. Xing, Wei & Wang, Hewu & Lu, Languang & Han, Xuebing & Sun, Kai & Ouyang, Minggao, 2021. "An adaptive virtual inertia control strategy for distributed battery energy storage system in microgrids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davi-Arderius, Daniel & Jamasb, Tooraj & Rosellon, Juan, 2024. "Renewable Integration and Power System Operation: The Role of Market Conditions," Working Papers 3-2024, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
    2. Davi-Arderius, Daniel & Schittekatte, Tim, 2023. "Carbon emissions impacts of operational network constraints: The case of Spain during the Covid-19 crisis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    3. Davi-Arderius, Daniel & Jamasb, Tooraj & Rosellon, Juan, 2024. "Network Operation and Constraints and the Path to Net Zero," Working Papers 8-2024, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
    4. Berlemann, Michael & Enkelmann, Sören, 2014. "The economic determinants of U.S. presidential approval: A survey," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 41-54.
    5. Eicke, Anselm & Schittekatte, Tim, 2022. "Fighting the wrong battle? A critical assessment of arguments against nodal electricity prices in the European debate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Daniel Davi-Arderius & Tooraj Jamasb, 2024. "Measuring a paradox: zero-negative electricity prices," Working Papers EPRG2413, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    7. Patrick C. Meirick & Jill A. Edy, 2022. "Beyond polarization and priming: Public agenda diversity and trust in government," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(4), pages 934-944, July.
    8. Davi-Arderius, Daniel & Schittekatte, Tim, 2023. "Environmental Impacts of Redispatching in Decarbonizing Electricity Systems: A Spanish Case Study," Working Papers 1-2023, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
    9. Matteo Mogliani, 2010. "Residual-based tests for cointegration and multiple deterministic structural breaks: A Monte Carlo study," Working Papers halshs-00564897, HAL.
    10. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Hoang, Thi Hong Van & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar & Roubaud, David, 2017. "Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: New evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 199-212.
    11. Karim L. Anaya & Michael G. Pollitt, 2021. "How to Procure Flexibility Services within the Electricity Distribution System: Lessons from an International Review of Innovation Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    12. Antonia López Villavicencio & Josep Lluís Raymond Bara, 2006. "The short and long-run determinants of the real exchange rate in Mexico," Working Papers wpdea0606, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    13. Saaed, A.A.J., 2007. "Inflation and Economic Growth in Kuwait: 1985-2005. Evidence from Co-Integration and Error Correction Model," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 7(1).
    14. Demiralay, Sercan & Ulusoy, Veysel, 2014. "Value-at-risk Predictions of Precious Metals with Long Memory Volatility Models," MPRA Paper 53229, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. John Barkoulas & Christopher Baum & Mustafa Caglayan, 1999. "Fractional monetary dynamics," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(11), pages 1393-1400.
    16. Jan Babecký & Fabrizio Coricelli & Roman Horváth, 2009. "Assessing Inflation Persistence: Micro Evidence on an Inflation Targeting Economy," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 59(2), pages 102-127, June.
    17. Creel, Jerome & Bihan, Herve Le, 2006. "Using structural balance data to test the fiscal theory of the price level: Some international evidence," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 338-360, June.
    18. Deniz Aksoy, 2010. "Who gets what, when, and how revisited: Voting and proposal powers in the allocation of the EU budget," European Union Politics, , vol. 11(2), pages 171-194, June.
    19. Pulapre Balakrishnan & M Parameswaran, 2019. "Modeling the Dynamics of Inflation in India," Working Papers 16, Ashoka University, Department of Economics.
    20. Baum, Christopher F & Karasulu, Meral, 1998. "Modelling Federal Reserve Discount Policy," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 11(1-2), pages 53-70, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Renewables; decarbonization; generation mix; redispatching; renewable curtailment; synchronous generators; day-ahead market; network constraints; gas crisis; system operator; smart grids; digitalization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities
    • Q41 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Demand and Supply; Prices
    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cam:camdae:2421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake Dyer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.