IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2501.13324.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparative Withholding Behavior Analysis of Historical Energy Storage Bids in California

Author

Listed:
  • Neal Ma
  • Ningkun Zheng
  • Ning Qi
  • Bolun Xu

Abstract

The rapid growth of battery energy storage in wholesale electricity markets calls for a deeper understanding of storage operators' bidding strategies and their market impacts. This study examines energy storage bidding data from the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) between July 1, 2023, and October 1, 2024, with a primary focus on economic withholding strategies. Our analysis reveals that storage bids are closely aligned with day-ahead and real-time market clearing prices, with notable bid inflation during price spikes. Statistical tests demonstrate a strong correlation between price spikes and capacity withholding, indicating that operators can anticipate price surges and use market volatility to increase profitability. Comparisons with optimal hindsight bids further reveal a clear daily periodic bidding pattern, highlighting extensive economic withholding. These results underscore potential market inefficiencies and highlight the need for refined regulatory measures to address economic withholding as storage capacity in the market continues to grow.

Suggested Citation

  • Neal Ma & Ningkun Zheng & Ning Qi & Bolun Xu, 2025. "Comparative Withholding Behavior Analysis of Historical Energy Storage Bids in California," Papers 2501.13324, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2501.13324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.13324
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williams, Olayinka & Green, Richard, 2022. "Electricity storage and market power," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Chabok, Hossein & Roustaei, Mahmoud & Sheikh, Morteza & Kavousi-Fard, Abdollah, 2020. "On the assessment of the impact of a price-maker energy storage unit on the operation of power system: The ISO point of view," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Sioshansi, Ramteen, 2014. "When energy storage reduces social welfare," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 106-116.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farzad Hassanzadeh Moghimi & Yihsu Chen & Afzal S. Siddiqui, 2023. "Flexible supply meets flexible demand: prosumer impact on strategic hydro operations," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-35, December.
    2. Megy, Camille & Massol, Olivier, 2023. "Is Power-to-Gas always beneficial? The implications of ownership structure," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    3. De Vivero-Serrano, Gustavo & Bruninx, Kenneth & Delarue, Erik, 2019. "Implications of bid structures on the offering strategies of merchant energy storage systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Arfaoui, Nadia, 2023. "Exploring downside risk dependence across energy markets: Electricity, conventional energy, carbon, and clean energy during episodes of market crises," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PB).
    5. Martin Weibelzahl & Alexandra Märtz, 2020. "Optimal storage and transmission investments in a bilevel electricity market model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(2), pages 911-940, April.
    6. Yu, Yang & Chen, Lin & Liu, Rui, 2023. "The source of wind power producers’ market power," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    7. Arnold, Lutz G. & Arnold, Volker, 2024. "Energy imports and manufacturing exports with successive oligopolies and storage," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    8. Ting Zhang & Shuaishuai Cao & Lingying Pan & Chenyu Zhou, 2020. "A Policy Effect Analysis of China’s Energy Storage Development Based on a Multi-Agent Evolutionary Game Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-35, November.
    9. Ali Darudi & Hannes Weigt, 2024. "Review and Assessment of Decarbonized Future Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-38, September.
    10. Paul Neetzow & Roman Mendelevitch & Sauleh Siddiqui, 2018. "Modeling Coordination between Renewables and Grid: Policies to Mitigate Distribution Grid Constraints Using Residential PV-Battery Systems," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1766, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    11. Intini, Mario & Waterson, Michael, 2020. "Do British wind generators behave strategically in response to the Western Link interconnector?," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 455, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    12. Go, Roderick S. & Munoz, Francisco D. & Watson, Jean-Paul, 2016. "Assessing the economic value of co-optimized grid-scale energy storage investments in supporting high renewable portfolio standards," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 902-913.
    13. David Andrés‐Cerezo & Natalia Fabra, 2023. "Storing power: market structure matters," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 54(1), pages 3-53, March.
    14. Loisel, Rodica & Simon, Corentin, 2021. "Market strategies for large-scale energy storage: Vertical integration versus stand-alone player," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    15. Debia, Sébastien & Pineau, Pierre-Olivier & Siddiqui, Afzal S., 2021. "Strategic storage use in a hydro-thermal power system with carbon constraints," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    16. Jerry Anunrojwong & Santiago R. Balseiro & Omar Besbes & Bolun Xu, 2024. "Battery Operations in Electricity Markets: Strategic Behavior and Distortions," Papers 2406.18685, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    17. Mohamed, Mohamed A. & Jin, Tao & Su, Wencong, 2020. "An effective stochastic framework for smart coordinated operation of wind park and energy storage unit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    18. Ding, Jie & Xu, Yujie & Chen, Haisheng & Sun, Wenwen & Hu, Shan & Sun, Shuang, 2019. "Value and economic estimation model for grid-scale energy storage in monopoly power markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 986-1002.
    19. Lu, Xiaoxing & Li, Kangping & Xu, Hanchen & Wang, Fei & Zhou, Zhenyu & Zhang, Yagang, 2020. "Fundamentals and business model for resource aggregator of demand response in electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    20. Yangfang (Helen) Zhou & Alan Scheller-Wolf & Nicola Secomandi & Stephen Smith, 2016. "Electricity Trading and Negative Prices: Storage vs. Disposal," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 880-898, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2501.13324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.