IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2412.16126.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Scenario-Based Assessment of the Long-Term Funding Adequacy of the German Nuclear Waste Fund KENFO

Author

Listed:
  • Mahdi Awawda
  • Alexander Wimmers

Abstract

The German site selection process for high-level nuclear waste was initially planned to conclude in 2031, with the deep geological repository sealed around the year 2080. However, in 2022, substantial delays were announced by the responsible federal agency, pushing the site selection to 2046 or even 2068. With this delay come uncertainties regarding the duration, consequential knowledge management, and funding. German nuclear waste management activities are funded by the external segregated fund KENFO, which is designed to ensure sufficient funding via generating returns on investments (ROI) in the coming decades. Given recent developments, we assess the adequacy of the fund volume based on seven scenarios depicting potential process delays. We find that the target ROI of 3.7% will not suffice in any case, even if the site selection concludes in 2031, and that cash injections of up to EUR31.07 billion are necessary today to ensure that the fund volume will suffice. We conclude that cost estimations must be updated, KENFO must increase its target ROIs, potential capital injections must be openly discussed by policymakers, and a procedural acceleration should be implemented to ensure that financial liabilities for nuclear waste management are minimized for future taxpayers.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahdi Awawda & Alexander Wimmers, 2024. "A Scenario-Based Assessment of the Long-Term Funding Adequacy of the German Nuclear Waste Fund KENFO," Papers 2412.16126, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2412.16126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.16126
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rothwell, Geoffrey, 2021. "Spent nuclear fuel storage: What are the relationships between size and cost of the alternatives?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Briggs, Th. & Kunsch, P. L. & Mareschal, B., 1990. "Nuclear waste management: An application of the multicriteria PROMETHEE methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1-10, January.
    3. Alexander Wimmers & Rebekka Bärenbold & Muhammad Maladoh Bah & Rebecca Lordan-Perret & Björn Steigerwald & Christian von Hirschhausen & Hannes Weigt & Ben Wealer, 2023. "Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants: Regulation, Financing, and Production," Data Documentation 104, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juliana Martins Ruzante & Valerie J. Davidson & Julie Caswell & Aamir Fazil & John A. L. Cranfield & Spencer J. Henson & Sven M. Anders & Claudia Schmidt & Jeffrey M. Farber, 2010. "A Multifactorial Risk Prioritization Framework for Foodborne Pathogens," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 724-742, May.
    2. Wegel, Sebastian & Czempinski, Victoria & Oei, Pao-Yu & Wealer, Ben, 2019. "Transporting and Storing High-Level Nuclear Waste in the U.S.—Insights from a Mathematical Model," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23.
    3. Hokkanen, Joonas & Salminen, Pekka, 1997. "Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 19-36, April.
    4. Rothwell, Geoffrey, 2022. "Projected electricity costs in international nuclear power markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    5. Abu-Taleb, Maher F. & Mareschal, Bertrand, 1995. "Water resources planning in the Middle East: Application of the PROMETHEE V multicriteria method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 500-511, March.
    6. Mareschal, Bertrand & Mertens, Daniel, 1993. "Évaluation financière par la méthode multicritère GAIA : application au secteur de l’assurance en Belgique," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 69(1), pages 206-228, mars.
    7. Salminen, Pekka & Hokkanen, Joonas & Lahdelma, Risto, 1998. "Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 485-496, February.
    8. Fumin Deng & Yanjie Li & Huirong Lin & Jinrui Miao & Xuedong Liang, 2020. "A BWM-TOPSIS Hazardous Waste Inventory Safety Risk Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Wang, Guangchao & Jia, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng & Qi, Hang, 2014. "A rank-dependent bi-criterion equilibrium model for stochastic transportation environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 511-529.
    10. Yousaf Ali & Zain Aslam & Hammad Sajid Dar & UbaidUllah Mumtaz, 2018. "A multi-criteria decision analysis of solid waste treatment options in Pakistan: Lahore City—a case in point," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 528-543, December.
    11. Juan Carlos Leyva Lopez & Jesus Jaime Solano Noriega & Diego Alonso Gastelum Chavira, 2017. "A Multi-Criteria Approach to Rank the Municipalities of the States of Mexico by its Marginalization Level: The Case of Jalisco," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 473-513, March.
    12. Juan Carlos Leyva Lopez & Diego Alonso Gastelum Chavira & Margarita Urias Ruiz, 2016. "A comparative approach of economic sectors in Sinaloa, Mexico, based on multicriteria decision aiding," EconoQuantum, Revista de Economia y Finanzas, Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Economico Administrativas, Departamento de Metodos Cuantitativos y Maestria en Economia., vol. 13(1), pages 97-124, Enero-Jun.
    13. Behzadian, Majid & Kazemzadeh, R.B. & Albadvi, A. & Aghdasi, M., 2010. "PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 198-215, January.
    14. Renaud Caillet, 2003. "Analyse multicritère : Étude de comparaison des méthodes existantes en vue d'une application en analyse de cycle de vie," CIRANO Working Papers 2003s-53, CIRANO.
    15. Jairo Cugliari & Antoine Rolland, 2018. "Simulation of multicriteria data," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(1), pages 21-37, June.
    16. Pandey, P. C. & Kengpol, Athakorn, 1995. "Selection of an automated inspection system using multiattribute decision analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 289-298, May.
    17. Souleymane Daniel & Christian Ghiaus, 2023. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Energy Retrofit of Residential Buildings: Methodology and Feedback from Real Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-31, January.
    18. Tavana, Madjid & Behzadian, Majid & Pirdashti, Mohsen & Pirdashti, Hasan, 2013. "A PROMETHEE-GDSS for oil and gas pipeline planning in the Caspian Sea basin," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 716-728.
    19. Juan Carlos Leyva Lopez & Diego Alonso Gastelum Chavira & Margarita Urias Ruiz, 2016. "A comparative approach of economic sectors in Sinaloa, Mexico, based on multicriteria decision aiding," EconoQuantum, Revista de Economia y Negocios, Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Economico Administrativas, Departamento de Metodos Cuantitativos y Maestria en Economia., vol. 13(1), pages 97-124, Enero-Jun.
    20. Chareonsuk, Chaichan & Nagarur, Nagen & Tabucanon, Mario T., 1997. "A multicriteria approach to the selection of preventive maintenance intervals," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 55-64, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2412.16126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.