IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2412.16126.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Scenario-Based Assessment of the Long-Term Funding Adequacy of the German Nuclear Waste Fund KENFO

Author

Listed:
  • Mahdi Awawda
  • Alexander Wimmers

Abstract

The German site selection process for high-level nuclear waste was initially planned to conclude in 2031, with the deep geological repository sealed around the year 2080. However, in 2022, substantial delays were announced by the responsible federal agency, pushing the site selection to 2046 or even 2068. With this delay come uncertainties regarding the duration, consequential knowledge management, and funding. German nuclear waste management activities are funded by the external segregated fund KENFO, which is designed to ensure sufficient funding via generating returns on investments (ROI) in the coming decades. Given recent developments, we assess the adequacy of the fund volume based on seven scenarios depicting potential process delays. We find that the target ROI of 3.7% will not suffice in any case, even if the site selection concludes in 2031, and that cash injections of up to EUR31.07 billion are necessary today to ensure that the fund volume will suffice. We conclude that cost estimations must be updated, KENFO must increase its target ROIs, potential capital injections must be openly discussed by policymakers, and a procedural acceleration should be implemented to ensure that financial liabilities for nuclear waste management are minimized for future taxpayers.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahdi Awawda & Alexander Wimmers, 2024. "A Scenario-Based Assessment of the Long-Term Funding Adequacy of the German Nuclear Waste Fund KENFO," Papers 2412.16126, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2412.16126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.16126
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2412.16126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.