IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2412.08850.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Emulating the Global Change Analysis Model with Deep Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Holmes
  • Matt Jensen
  • Sarah Coffland
  • Hidemi Mitani Shen
  • Logan Sizemore
  • Seth Bassetti
  • Brenna Nieva
  • Claudia Tebaldi
  • Abigail Snyder
  • Brian Hutchinson

Abstract

The Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM) simulates complex interactions between the coupled Earth and human systems, providing valuable insights into the co-evolution of land, water, and energy sectors under different future scenarios. Understanding the sensitivities and drivers of this multisectoral system can lead to more robust understanding of the different pathways to particular outcomes. The interactions and complexity of the coupled human-Earth systems make GCAM simulations costly to run at scale - a requirement for large ensemble experiments which explore uncertainty in model parameters and outputs. A differentiable emulator with similar predictive power, but greater efficiency, could provide novel scenario discovery and analysis of GCAM and its outputs, requiring fewer runs of GCAM. As a first use case, we train a neural network on an existing large ensemble that explores a range of GCAM inputs related to different relative contributions of energy production sources, with a focus on wind and solar. We complement this existing ensemble with interpolated input values and a wider selection of outputs, predicting 22,528 GCAM outputs across time, sectors, and regions. We report a median $R^2$ score of 0.998 for the emulator's predictions and an $R^2$ score of 0.812 for its input-output sensitivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Holmes & Matt Jensen & Sarah Coffland & Hidemi Mitani Shen & Logan Sizemore & Seth Bassetti & Brenna Nieva & Claudia Tebaldi & Abigail Snyder & Brian Hutchinson, 2024. "Emulating the Global Change Analysis Model with Deep Learning," Papers 2412.08850, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2412.08850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.08850
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Flannery Dolan & Jonathan Lamontagne & Robert Link & Mohamad Hejazi & Patrick Reed & Jae Edmonds, 2021. "Evaluating the economic impact of water scarcity in a changing world," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Sobol’, I.M. & Kucherenko, S., 2009. "Derivative based global sensitivity measures and their link with global sensitivity indices," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(10), pages 3009-3017.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco A. Buendia-Hernandez & Maria J. Ortiz Bevia & Francisco J. Alvarez-Garcia & Antonio Ruizde Elvira, 2022. "Sensitivity of a Dynamic Model of Air Traffic Emissions to Technological and Environmental Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Kucherenko, Sergei & Song, Shufang & Wang, Lu, 2019. "Quantile based global sensitivity measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 35-48.
    3. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    4. Matieyendou Lamboni, 2020. "Uncertainty quantification: a minimum variance unbiased (joint) estimator of the non-normalized Sobol’ indices," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 1939-1970, October.
    5. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar & Rabitti, Giovanni, 2024. "The many Shapley values for explainable artificial intelligence: A sensitivity analysis perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(3), pages 911-926.
    6. Abbygail Jaccard & Lise Retat & Martin Brown & Laura Webber & Zaid Chalabi, 2018. "Global Sensitivity Analysis of a Model Simulating an Individual’s Health State through Their Lifetime," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 11(3), pages 100-121.
    7. Wei, Pengfei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Yuan, Xiukai, 2013. "Monte Carlo simulation for moment-independent sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 60-67.
    8. Li, Shangge & Jian, Jinfeng & Poopal, Rama Krishnan & Chen, Xinyu & He, Yaqi & Xu, Hongbin & Yu, Huimin & Ren, Zongming, 2022. "Mathematical modeling in behavior responses: The tendency-prediction based on a persistence model on real-time data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).
    9. Ge, Qiao & Menendez, Monica, 2017. "Extending Morris method for qualitative global sensitivity analysis of models with dependent inputs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 28-39.
    10. Omid Bozorg-Haddad & Mahdi Bahrami & Ayda Gholami & Xuefeng Chu & Hugo A. Loáiciga, 2024. "Investigation and classification of water resources management strategies: possible threats and solutions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(11), pages 9867-9892, September.
    11. A. L. Hamilton & P. M. Reed & R. S. Gupta & H. B. Zeff & G. W. Characklis, 2024. "Resilient water infrastructure partnerships in institutionally complex systems face challenging supply and financial risk tradeoffs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Paleari, Livia & Movedi, Ermes & Zoli, Michele & Burato, Andrea & Cecconi, Irene & Errahouly, Jabir & Pecollo, Eleonora & Sorvillo, Carla & Confalonieri, Roberto, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis using Morris: Just screening or an effective ranking method?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    13. Lamboni, Matieyendou, 2021. "Derivative-based integral equalities and inequality: A proxy-measure for sensitivity analysis," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 137-161.
    14. Matieyendou Lamboni, 2018. "Global sensitivity analysis: a generalized, unbiased and optimal estimator of total-effect variance," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 361-386, March.
    15. Elia Moretti & Michael Benzaquen, 2024. "Mitigating Farmland Biodiversity Loss: A Bio-Economic Model of Land Consolidation and Pesticide Use," Papers 2407.19749, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    16. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Donghui & Okolo N, Patrick & Hu, Fan & Zhang, Weihua, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis using a Gaussian Radial Basis Function metamodel," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 171-179.
    17. Patrick Steinmann & Koen van der Zwet & Bas Keijser, 2024. "Simulation‐based generation and analysis of multidimensional future scenarios with time series clustering," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(4), December.
    18. Fruth, J. & Roustant, O. & Kuhnt, S., 2019. "Support indices: Measuring the effect of input variables over their supports," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 17-27.
    19. Liu, Yaning & Yousuff Hussaini, M. & Ökten, Giray, 2016. "Accurate construction of high dimensional model representation with applications to uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 281-295.
    20. Wong, Chun Yui & Seshadri, Pranay & Parks, Geoffrey, 2021. "Extremum sensitivity analysis with polynomial Monte Carlo filtering," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2412.08850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.