IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2407.13688.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Deep learning for quadratic hedging in incomplete jump market

Author

Listed:
  • Nacira Agram
  • Bernt {O}ksendal
  • Jan Rems

Abstract

We propose a deep learning approach to study the minimal variance pricing and hedging problem in an incomplete jump diffusion market. It is based upon a rigorous stochastic calculus derivation of the optimal hedging portfolio, optimal option price, and the corresponding equivalent martingale measure through the means of the Stackelberg game approach. A deep learning algorithm based on the combination of the feedforward and LSTM neural networks is tested on three different market models, two of which are incomplete. In contrast, the complete market Black-Scholes model serves as a benchmark for the algorithm's performance. The results that indicate the algorithm's good performance are presented and discussed. In particular, we apply our results to the special incomplete market model studied by Merton and give a detailed comparison between our results based on the minimal variance principle and the results obtained by Merton based on a different pricing principle. Using deep learning, we find that the minimal variance principle leads to typically higher option prices than those deduced from the Merton principle. On the other hand, the minimal variance principle leads to lower losses than the Merton principle.

Suggested Citation

  • Nacira Agram & Bernt {O}ksendal & Jan Rems, 2024. "Deep learning for quadratic hedging in incomplete jump market," Papers 2407.13688, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2407.13688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.13688
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicolas Boursin & Carl Remlinger & Joseph Mikael & Carol Anne Hargreaves, 2022. "Deep Generators on Commodity Markets; application to Deep Hedging," Papers 2205.13942, arXiv.org.
    2. S. G. Kou, 2002. "A Jump-Diffusion Model for Option Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(8), pages 1086-1101, August.
    3. Nicolas Boursin & Carl Remlinger & Joseph Mikael, 2022. "Deep Generators on Commodity Markets Application to Deep Hedging," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Alexandre Carbonneau & Fr'ed'eric Godin, 2021. "Deep Equal Risk Pricing of Financial Derivatives with Multiple Hedging Instruments," Papers 2102.12694, arXiv.org.
    5. Alexandre Carbonneau & Frédéric Godin, 2021. "Equal risk pricing of derivatives with deep hedging," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 593-608, April.
    6. S. G. Kou & Hui Wang, 2004. "Option Pricing Under a Double Exponential Jump Diffusion Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1178-1192, September.
    7. Jiequn Han & Ruimeng Hu, 2021. "Recurrent Neural Networks for Stochastic Control Problems with Delay," Papers 2101.01385, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    8. Madan, Dilip B & Seneta, Eugene, 1990. "The Variance Gamma (V.G.) Model for Share Market Returns," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 63(4), pages 511-524, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nacira Agram & Bernt Øksendal & Jan Rems, 2024. "Deep learning for quadratic hedging in incomplete jump market," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 463-499, September.
    2. Michael C. Fu & Bingqing Li & Guozhen Li & Rongwen Wu, 2017. "Option Pricing for a Jump-Diffusion Model with General Discrete Jump-Size Distributions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3961-3977, November.
    3. Buckley, Winston & Long, Hongwei & Marshall, Mario, 2016. "Numerical approximations of optimal portfolios in mispriced asymmetric Lévy markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 676-686.
    4. Markus Leippold & Nikola Vasiljević, 2020. "Option-Implied Intrahorizon Value at Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 397-414, January.
    5. Svetlana Boyarchenko & Sergei Levendorskiĭ, 2019. "Sinh-Acceleration: Efficient Evaluation Of Probability Distributions, Option Pricing, And Monte Carlo Simulations," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(03), pages 1-49, May.
    6. Liming Feng & Vadim Linetsky, 2008. "Pricing Options in Jump-Diffusion Models: An Extrapolation Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(2), pages 304-325, April.
    7. Liming Feng & Vadim Linetsky, 2008. "Pricing Discretely Monitored Barrier Options And Defaultable Bonds In Lévy Process Models: A Fast Hilbert Transform Approach," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 337-384, July.
    8. Coqueret, Guillaume & Tavin, Bertrand, 2016. "An investigation of model risk in a market with jumps and stochastic volatility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(3), pages 648-658.
    9. Jang, H. & Lee, J., 2019. "Machine learning versus econometric jump models in predictability and domain adaptability of index options," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 513(C), pages 74-86.
    10. Weng, Chengguo, 2013. "Constant proportion portfolio insurance under a regime switching exponential Lévy process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 508-521.
    11. Vidal Nunes, João Pedro & Ruas, João Pedro & Dias, José Carlos, 2020. "Early exercise boundaries for American-style knock-out options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 753-766.
    12. Walter Farkas & Ludovic Mathys, 2020. "Geometric Step Options with Jumps. Parity Relations, PIDEs, and Semi-Analytical Pricing," Papers 2002.09911, arXiv.org.
    13. Chendi Ni & Yuying Li & Peter A. Forsyth, 2023. "Neural Network Approach to Portfolio Optimization with Leverage Constraints:a Case Study on High Inflation Investment," Papers 2304.05297, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    14. Dilip B. Madan & Wim Schoutens & King Wang, 2017. "Measuring And Monitoring The Efficiency Of Markets," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(08), pages 1-32, December.
    15. Pascal Franc{c}ois & Genevi`eve Gauthier & Fr'ed'eric Godin & Carlos Octavio P'erez Mendoza, 2024. "Enhancing Deep Hedging of Options with Implied Volatility Surface Feedback Information," Papers 2407.21138, arXiv.org.
    16. Boris Ter-Avanesov & Homayoon Beigi, 2024. "MLP, XGBoost, KAN, TDNN, and LSTM-GRU Hybrid RNN with Attention for SPX and NDX European Call Option Pricing," Papers 2409.06724, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    17. Gapeev, Pavel V., 2006. "On maximal inequalities for some jump processes," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2006-060, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    18. Alexandre Carbonneau & Fr'ed'eric Godin, 2021. "Deep equal risk pricing of financial derivatives with non-translation invariant risk measures," Papers 2107.11340, arXiv.org.
    19. Leippold, Markus & Vasiljević, Nikola, 2017. "Pricing and disentanglement of American puts in the hyper-exponential jump-diffusion model," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 78-94.
    20. Park, Yang-Ho, 2016. "The effects of asymmetric volatility and jumps on the pricing of VIX derivatives," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 313-328.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2407.13688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.