IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2405.09519.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cost-Benefit Analysis using Modular Dynamic Fault Tree Analysis and Monte Carlo Simulations for Condition-based Maintenance of Unmanned Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph M. Southgate
  • Katrina Groth
  • Peter Sandborn
  • Shapour Azarm

Abstract

Recent developments in condition-based maintenance (CBM) have helped make it a promising approach to maintenance cost avoidance in engineering systems. By performing maintenance based on conditions of the component with regards to failure or time, there is potential to avoid the large costs of system shutdown and maintenance delays. However, CBM requires a large investment cost compared to other available maintenance strategies. The investment cost is required for research, development, and implementation. Despite the potential to avoid significant maintenance costs, the large investment cost of CBM makes decision makers hesitant to implement. This study is the first in the literature that attempts to address the problem of conducting a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) for implementing CBM concepts for unmanned systems. This paper proposes a method for conducting a CBA to determine the return on investment (ROI) of potential CBM strategies. The CBA seeks to compare different CBM strategies based on the differences in the various maintenance requirements associated with maintaining a multi-component, unmanned system. The proposed method uses modular dynamic fault tree analysis (MDFTA) with Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) to assess the various maintenance requirements. The proposed method is demonstrated on an unmanned surface vessel (USV) example taken from the literature that consists of 5 subsystems and 71 components. Following this USV example, it is found that selecting different combinations of components for a CBM strategy can have a significant impact on maintenance requirements and ROI by impacting cost avoidances and investment costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph M. Southgate & Katrina Groth & Peter Sandborn & Shapour Azarm, 2024. "Cost-Benefit Analysis using Modular Dynamic Fault Tree Analysis and Monte Carlo Simulations for Condition-based Maintenance of Unmanned Systems," Papers 2405.09519, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2405.09519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.09519
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Poppe, Joeri & Boute, Robert N. & Lambrecht, Marc R., 2018. "A hybrid condition-based maintenance policy for continuously monitored components with two degradation thresholds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 515-532.
    2. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Staden, Heletjé E. & Deprez, Laurens & Boute, Robert N., 2022. "A dynamic “predict, then optimize” preventive maintenance approach using operational intervention data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 1079-1096.
    2. Vanderschueren, Toon & Boute, Robert & Verdonck, Tim & Baesens, Bart & Verbeke, Wouter, 2023. "Optimizing the preventive maintenance frequency with causal machine learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    3. van Staden, Heletjé E. & Boute, Robert N., 2021. "The effect of multi-sensor data on condition-based maintenance policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 585-600.
    4. Wu, Shaomin & Wu, Di & Peng, Rui, 2023. "Considering greenhouse gas emissions in maintenance optimisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1135-1145.
    5. Mai, Yuxi & Xue, Jianwu & Wu, Bei, 2023. "Optimal maintenance policy for systems with environment-modulated degradation and random shocks considering imperfect maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    6. Deprez, Laurens & Antonio, Katrien & Boute, Robert, 2021. "Pricing service maintenance contracts using predictive analytics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 530-545.
    7. Azizi, Fariba & Salari, Nooshin, 2023. "A novel condition-based maintenance framework for parallel manufacturing systems based on bivariate birth/birth–death processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    8. Li, Meiyan & Wu, Bei, 2024. "Optimal condition-based opportunistic maintenance policy for two-component systems considering common cause failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    9. Torrado, Nuria, 2022. "Optimal component-type allocation and replacement time policies for parallel systems having multi-types dependent components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    10. Kivanç, İpek & Fecarotti, Claudia & Raassens, Néomie & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2024. "A scalable multi-objective maintenance optimization model for systems with multiple heterogeneous components and a finite lifespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 567-579.
    11. Vladimir Rykov & Olga Kochueva & Yaroslav Rykov, 2021. "Preventive Maintenance of the k -out-of- n System with Respect to Cost-Type Criterion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Liu, Gehui & Chen, Shaokuan & Ho, Tinkin & Ran, Xinchen & Mao, Baohua & Lan, Zhen, 2022. "Optimum opportunistic maintenance schedule over variable horizons considering multi-stage degradation and dynamic strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    13. Voorberg, S. & van Jaarsveld, W. & Eshuis, R. & van Houtum, G.J., 2023. "Information acquisition for service contract quotations made by repair shops," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1166-1177.
    14. Jyrki Savolainen & Michele Urbani, 2021. "Maintenance optimization for a multi-unit system with digital twin simulation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 1953-1973, October.
    15. Kampitsis, Dimitris & Panagiotidou, Sofia, 2022. "A Bayesian condition-based maintenance and monitoring policy with variable sampling intervals," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    16. da Costa, Paulo & Verleijsdonk, Peter & Voorberg, Simon & Akcay, Alp & Kapodistria, Stella & van Jaarsveld, Willem & Zhang, Yingqian, 2023. "Policies for the dynamic traveling maintainer problem with alerts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1141-1152.
    17. Nooshin Salari & Viliam Makis, 2020. "Application of Markov renewal theory and semi‐Markov decision processes in maintenance modeling and optimization of multi‐unit systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(7), pages 548-558, October.
    18. Huynh, K.T., 2021. "An adaptive predictive maintenance model for repairable deteriorating systems using inverse Gaussian degradation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    19. Toon Vanderschueren & Robert Boute & Tim Verdonck & Bart Baesens & Wouter Verbeke, 2022. "Prescriptive maintenance with causal machine learning," Papers 2206.01562, arXiv.org.
    20. Mikhail, Mina & Ouali, Mohamed-Salah & Yacout, Soumaya, 2024. "A data-driven methodology with a nonparametric reliability method for optimal condition-based maintenance strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2405.09519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.