IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2403.00458.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Prices and preferences in the electric vehicle market

Author

Listed:
  • Chung Yi See
  • Vasco Rato Santos
  • Lucas Woodley
  • Megan Yeo
  • Daniel Palmer
  • Shuheng Zhang
  • and Ashley Nunes

Abstract

Although electric vehicles are less polluting than gasoline powered vehicles, adoption is challenged by higher procurement prices. Existing discourse emphasizes EV battery costs as being principally responsible for this price differential and widespread adoption is routinely conditioned upon battery costs declining. We scrutinize such reasoning by sourcing data on EV attributes and market conditions between 2011 and 2023. Our findings are fourfold. First, EV prices are influenced principally by the number of amenities, additional features, and dealer-installed accessories sold as standard on an EV, and to a lesser extent, by EV horsepower. Second, EV range is negatively correlated with EV price implying that range anxiety concerns may be less consequential than existing discourse suggests. Third, battery capacity is positively correlated with EV price, due to more capacity being synonymous with the delivery of more horsepower. Collectively, this suggests that higher procurement prices for EVs reflects consumer preference for vehicles that are feature dense and more powerful. Fourth and finally, accommodating these preferences have produced vehicles with lower fuel economy, a shift that reduces envisioned lifecycle emissions benefits by at least 3.26 percent, subject to the battery pack chemistry leveraged and the carbon intensity of the electrical grid. These findings warrant attention as decarbonization efforts increasingly emphasize electrification as a pathway for complying with domestic and international climate agreements.

Suggested Citation

  • Chung Yi See & Vasco Rato Santos & Lucas Woodley & Megan Yeo & Daniel Palmer & Shuheng Zhang & and Ashley Nunes, 2024. "Prices and preferences in the electric vehicle market," Papers 2403.00458, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2403.00458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.00458
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Wolfram & Stephanie Weber & Kenneth Gillingham & Edgar G. Hertwich, 2021. "Pricing indirect emissions accelerates low—carbon transition of US light vehicle sector," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Zachary A. Needell & James McNerney & Michael T. Chang & Jessika E. Trancik, 2016. "Potential for widespread electrification of personal vehicle travel in the United States," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 1(9), pages 1-7, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neaimeh, Myriam & Salisbury, Shawn D. & Hill, Graeme A. & Blythe, Philip T. & Scoffield, Don R. & Francfort, James E., 2017. "Analysing the usage and evidencing the importance of fast chargers for the adoption of battery electric vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 474-486.
    2. Pan, Shuai & Yu, Wendi & Fulton, Lewis M. & Jung, Jia & Choi, Yunsoo & Gao, H. Oliver, 2023. "Impacts of the large-scale use of passenger electric vehicles on public health in 30 US. metropolitan areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Zia Wadud & Muhammad Adeel & Jillian Anable, 2024. "Understanding the large role of long-distance travel in carbon emissions from passenger travel," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 9(9), pages 1129-1138, September.
    4. Yu, Zhen & Wang, Yilan & Ma, Xiaoqian & Shuai, Chuanmin & Zhao, Yujia, 2023. "How critical mineral supply security affects China NEVs industry? Based on a prediction for chromium and cobalt in 2030," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    5. Zarazua de Rubens, Gerardo, 2019. "Who will buy electric vehicles after early adopters? Using machine learning to identify the electric vehicle mainstream market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 243-254.
    6. Mandegari, Mohsen & Ebadian, Mahmood & Saddler, Jack (John), 2023. "The need for effective life cycle assessment (LCA) to enhance the effectiveness of policies such as low carbon fuel standards (LCFS's)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    7. Yifei Xie & Mazen Danaf & Carlos Lima Azevedo & Arun Prakash Akkinepally & Bilge Atasoy & Kyungsoo Jeong & Ravi Seshadri & Moshe Ben-Akiva, 2019. "Behavioral modeling of on-demand mobility services: general framework and application to sustainable travel incentives," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2017-2039, December.
    8. Zhang, Junjie & Jia, Rongwen & Yang, Hangjun & Dong, Kangyin, 2022. "Does electric vehicle promotion in the public sector contribute to urban transport carbon emissions reduction?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 151-163.
    9. Reda Cherif & Fuad Hasanov & Aditya Pande, 2021. "Riding the Energy Transition: Oil beyond 2040," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 16(1), pages 117-137, January.
    10. Alzaghrini, Nadine & Milovanoff, Alexandre & Roy, Riddhiman & Abdul-Manan, Amir F.N. & McKechnie, Jon & Posen, I. Daniel & MacLean, Heather L., 2024. "Closing the GHG mitigation gap with measures targeting conventional gasoline light-duty vehicles – A scenario-based analysis of the U.S. fleet," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    11. Habla, Wolfgang & Huwe, Vera & Kesternich, Martin, 2020. "Beyond monetary barriers to electric vehicle adoption: Evidence from observed usage of private and shared cars," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-026, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    12. Shang, Wen-Long & Chen, Yishui & Yu, Qing & Song, Xuewang & Chen, Yanyan & Ma, Xiaolei & Chen, Xiqun & Tan, Zhijia & Huang, Jianling & Ochieng, Washington, 2023. "Spatio-temporal analysis of carbon footprints for urban public transport systems based on smart card data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    13. Choi, Hyunhong & Lee, Jeongeun & Koo, Yoonmo, 2023. "Value of different electric vehicle charging facility types under different availability situations: A South Korean case study of electric vehicle and internal combustion engine vehicle owners," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    14. Liang, Jing & Qiu, Yueming (Lucy) & Xing, Bo, 2022. "Impacts of the co-adoption of electric vehicles and solar panel systems: Empirical evidence of changes in electricity demand and consumer behaviors from household smart meter data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. Comello, Stephen & Glenk, Gunther & Reichelstein, Stefan, 2020. "Cost-efficient transition to clean energy transportation services," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-054, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    16. Chunbo Zhang & Xiang Zhao & Romain Sacchi & Fengqi You, 2023. "Trade-off between critical metal requirement and transportation decarbonization in automotive electrification," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Kang, Jia-Ning & Wei, Yi-Ming & Liu, Lan-Cui & Han, Rong & Yu, Bi-Ying & Wang, Jin-Wei, 2020. "Energy systems for climate change mitigation: A systematic review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    18. Zhang, Haifeng & Tian, Ming & Zhang, Cong & Wang, Bin & Wang, Dai, 2021. "A systematic solution to quantify economic values of vehicle grid integration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    19. Maxwell Woody & Shawn A. Adderly & Rushabh Bohra & Gregory A. Keoleian, 2024. "Electric and gasoline vehicle total cost of ownership across US cities," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(2), pages 194-215, April.
    20. Zhang, Haoran & Song, Xuan & Xia, Tianqi & Yuan, Meng & Fan, Zipei & Shibasaki, Ryosuke & Liang, Yongtu, 2018. "Battery electric vehicles in Japan: Human mobile behavior based adoption potential analysis and policy target response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 527-535.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2403.00458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.