IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2402.14506.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Enhancing Rolling Horizon Production Planning Through Stochastic Optimization Evaluated by Means of Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Schlenkrich
  • Wolfgang Seiringer
  • Klaus Altendorfer
  • Sophie N. Parragh

Abstract

Production planning must account for uncertainty in a production system, arising from fluctuating demand forecasts. Therefore, this article focuses on the integration of updated customer demand into the rolling horizon planning cycle. We use scenario-based stochastic programming to solve capacitated lot sizing problems under stochastic demand in a rolling horizon environment. This environment is replicated using a discrete event simulation-optimization framework, where the optimization problem is periodically solved, leveraging the latest demand information to continually adjust the production plan. We evaluate the stochastic optimization approach and compare its performance to solving a deterministic lot sizing model, using expected demand figures as input, as well as to standard Material Requirements Planning (MRP). In the simulation study, we analyze three different customer behaviors related to forecasting, along with four levels of shop load, within a multi-item and multi-stage production system. We test a range of significant parameter values for the three planning methods and compute the overall costs to benchmark them. The results show that the production plans obtained by MRP are outperformed by deterministic and stochastic optimization. Particularly, when facing tight resource restrictions and rising uncertainty in customer demand, the use of stochastic optimization becomes preferable compared to deterministic optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Schlenkrich & Wolfgang Seiringer & Klaus Altendorfer & Sophie N. Parragh, 2024. "Enhancing Rolling Horizon Production Planning Through Stochastic Optimization Evaluated by Means of Simulation," Papers 2402.14506, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2402.14506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.14506
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Almeder & Margaretha Preusser & Richard F. Hartl, 2009. "Simulation and optimization of supply chains: alternative or complementary approaches?," Springer Books, in: Herbert Meyr & Hans-Otto Günther (ed.), Supply Chain Planning, pages 29-53, Springer.
    2. Curcio, Eduardo & Amorim, Pedro & Zhang, Qi & Almada-Lobo, Bernardo, 2018. "Adaptation and approximate strategies for solving the lot-sizing and scheduling problem under multistage demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 81-96.
    3. Francisco Campuzano-Bolarín & Josefa Mula & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero & Álvar-Ginés Legaz-Aparicio, 2020. "A rolling horizon simulation approach for managing demand with lead time variability," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(12), pages 3800-3820, June.
    4. Klaus Altendorfer & Thomas Felberbauer & Herbert Jodlbauer, 2016. "Effects of forecast errors on optimal utilisation in aggregate production planning with stochastic customer demand," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(12), pages 3718-3735, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giscard Valonne Mouafo Nebot & Haiyan Wang, 2022. "RETRACTED: Port Terminal Performance Evaluation and Modeling," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Huang, Shiyang & Hu, Guiping & Chennault, Carrie & Su, Liu & Brandes, Elke & Heaton, Emily & Schulte, Lisa & Wang, Lizhi & Tyndall, John, 2016. "Agent-based modeling of bioenergy crop adoption and farmer decision-making," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1188-1201.
    3. Romauch, Martin & Hartl, Richard F., 2017. "Capacity planning for cluster tools in the semiconductor industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 167-180.
    4. Nasreddine Saadouli, 2021. "Stochastic programming model for production planning with stochastic aggregate demand and spreadsheet-based solution heuristics," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31(4), pages 117-127.
    5. Li, Yuchen & Liu, Ming & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco & Yang, Zaoli, 2024. "Risk-averse two-stage stochastic programming for assembly line reconfiguration with dynamic lot sizes," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    6. Matt Bassett & Leslie Gardner, 2013. "Designing optimal global supply chains at Dow AgroSciences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 187-216, March.
    7. Eren Özceylan & Cihan Çetinkaya & Neslihan Demirel & Ozan Sabırlıoğlu, 2017. "Impacts of Additive Manufacturing on Supply Chain Flow: A Simulation Approach in Healthcare Industry," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Fabian Dunke & Stefan Nickel, 2021. "Online optimization with gradual look-ahead," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 2489-2523, December.
    9. Huang, Shiyang & Hu, Guiping, 2018. "Biomass supply contract pricing and environmental policy analysis: A simulation approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 557-566.
    10. Zeiträg, Yannik & Figueira, José Rui & Pereira, Miguel Alves, 2024. "A web-based interactive decision support system for a multi-objective lot-sizing and production scheduling model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    11. Bakker, Hannah & Dunke, Fabian & Nickel, Stefan, 2020. "A structuring review on multi-stage optimization under uncertainty: Aligning concepts from theory and practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    12. Li, Yuchen & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco & Liu, Ming & Yang, Zaoli, 2023. "A risk-averse two-stage stochastic programming model for a joint multi-item capacitated line balancing and lot-sizing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 353-365.
    13. Bertha Maya Sopha & Sekar Sakti & Ari Carisza Graha Prasetia & Marselina Winda Dwiansarinopa & Kevin Cullinane, 2021. "Simulating long-term performance of regional distribution centers in archipelagic logistics systems," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(4), pages 697-725, December.
    14. Yumihito Otsubo & Andrew J. Chapman, 2023. "Assessing Corporate Vendor Selection in the Oil and Gas Industry: A Review of Green Strategies and Carbon Reduction Options," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Andres F. Osorio & Sally C. Brailsford & Honora K. Smith & Sonia P. Forero-Matiz & Bernardo A. Camacho-Rodríguez, 2017. "Simulation-optimization model for production planning in the blood supply chain," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 548-564, December.
    16. Mahyar Alimian & Vahidreza Ghezavati & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam & Reza Ramezanian, 2024. "On the availability and changeover cases of the general lot-sizing and scheduling problem with maintenance modelling: a Lagrangian-based heuristic approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1-43, June.
    17. Bilge Bilgen & Yelda Çelebi, 2013. "Integrated production scheduling and distribution planning in dairy supply chain by hybrid modelling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 55-82, December.
    18. Linsen Chong & Carolina Osorio, 2018. "A Simulation-Based Optimization Algorithm for Dynamic Large-Scale Urban Transportation Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 637-656, June.
    19. Martin Hrušovský & Emrah Demir & Werner Jammernegg & Tom Woensel, 2018. "Hybrid simulation and optimization approach for green intermodal transportation problem with travel time uncertainty," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 486-516, September.
    20. MacCarthy, Bart L. & Ovutmen, Tamer, 2015. "Using a central Vehicle Holding Compound (VHC) in an open pipeline automotive order fulfilment system: A simulation study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 590-601.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2402.14506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.