IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2312.16710.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Health-related Quality of life, Financial Toxicity, Productivity Loss and Catastrophic Health Expenditures After Lung Cancer Diagnosis in Argentina

Author

Listed:
  • Lucas Gonzalez
  • Andrea Alcaraz
  • Carolina Gabay
  • Monica Castro
  • Silvina Vigo
  • Eduardo Carinci
  • Federico Augustovski

Abstract

Objective: About 12,000 people are diagnosed with lung cancer (LC) each year in Argentina, and the diagnosis has a significant personal and family. The objective of this study was to characterize the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and the economic impact in patients with LC and in their households. Methods: Observational cross-sectional study, through validated structured questionnaires to patients with a diagnosis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in two referral public health care centers in Argentina. Questionnaries used: Health-Related Quality of life (EuroQol EQ-5D-3L questionnaire); financial toxicity (COST questionnaire); productivity loss (WPAI-GH, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: General Health), and out-of-pocket expenses. Results: We included 101 consecutive patients (mean age 67.5 years; 55.4% men; 57.4% with advanced disease -stage III/IV-). The mean EQ-VAS was 68.8 (SD:18.3), with 82.2% describing fair or poor health. The most affected dimensions were anxiety/depression, pain, and activities of daily living. Patients reported an average 59% decrease in their ability to perform regular daily activities as measured by WPAI-GH. 54.5% reported a reduction in income due to the disease, and 19.8% lost their jobs. The annual economic productivity loss was estimated at USD 2,465 per person. 70.3%) of patients reported financial toxicity. The average out-of-pocket expenditure was USD 100.38 per person per month, which represented 18.5% of household income. Catastrophic expenditures were present in 37.1% of households. When performing subgroup analysis by disease severity, all outcomes were worse in the subpopulation with advanced disease. Conclusions Patients with NSCLC treated in public hospitals in Argentina have significant health-related quality of life and economic impact, worsening in patients with advanced disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucas Gonzalez & Andrea Alcaraz & Carolina Gabay & Monica Castro & Silvina Vigo & Eduardo Carinci & Federico Augustovski, 2023. "Health-related Quality of life, Financial Toxicity, Productivity Loss and Catastrophic Health Expenditures After Lung Cancer Diagnosis in Argentina," Papers 2312.16710, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2312.16710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.16710
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louisa G. Gordon & Katharina M. D. Merollini & Anthony Lowe & Raymond J. Chan, 2017. "A Systematic Review of Financial Toxicity Among Cancer Survivors: We Can’t Pay the Co-Pay," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 10(3), pages 295-309, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katharina M. D. Merollini & Louisa G. Gordon & Joanne F. Aitken & Michael G. Kimlin, 2020. "Lifetime Costs of Surviving Cancer—A Queensland Study (COS-Q): Protocol of a Large Healthcare Data Linkage Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Annie Bygrave & Kate Whittaker & Christine Paul & Elizabeth A. Fradgley & Megan Varlow & Sanchia Aranda, 2021. "Australian Experiences of Out-of-Pocket Costs and Financial Burden Following a Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-19, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2312.16710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.