IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2302.05677.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Tractable Truthful Profit Maximization Mechanism Design with Autonomous Agents

Author

Listed:
  • Mina Montazeri
  • Hamed Kebriaei
  • Babak N. Araabi

Abstract

Task allocation is a crucial process in modern systems, but it is often challenged by incomplete information about the utilities of participating agents. In this paper, we propose a new profit maximization mechanism for the task allocation problem, where the task publisher seeks an optimal incentive function to maximize its own profit and simultaneously ensure the truthful announcing of the agent's private information (type) and its participation in the task, while an autonomous agent aims at maximizing its own utility function by deciding on its participation level and announced type. Our mechanism stands out from the classical contract theory-based truthful mechanisms as it empowers agents to make their own decisions about their level of involvement, making it more practical for many real-world task allocation scenarios. It has been proven that by considering a linear form of incentive function consisting of two decision functions for the task publisher the mechanism's goals are met. The proposed truthful mechanism is initially modeled as a non-convex functional optimization with the double continuum of constraints, nevertheless, we demonstrate that by deriving an equivalent form of the incentive constraints, it can be reformulated as a tractable convex optimal control problem. Further, we propose a numerical algorithm to obtain the solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Mina Montazeri & Hamed Kebriaei & Babak N. Araabi, 2023. "A Tractable Truthful Profit Maximization Mechanism Design with Autonomous Agents," Papers 2302.05677, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2302.05677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.05677
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nasimeh Heydaribeni & Achilleas Anastasopoulos, 2019. "Distributed Mechanism Design for Network Resource Allocation Problems," Papers 1904.01222, arXiv.org.
    2. Barucci, Emilio & Gozzi, Fausto & Swiech, Andrzej, 2000. "Incentive compatibility constraints and dynamic programming in continuous time," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 471-508, December.
    3. J. Preininger & P. T. Vuong, 2018. "On the convergence of the gradient projection method for convex optimal control problems with bang–bang solutions," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 221-238, May.
    4. Kosenok, Grigory & Severinov, Sergei, 2008. "Individually rational, budget-balanced mechanisms and allocation of surplus," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 126-161, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Satterthwaite, Mark A. & Williams, Steven R. & Zachariadis, Konstantinos E., 2014. "Optimality versus practicality in market design: A comparison of two double auctions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 248-263.
    2. Eric van Damme & Xu Lang, 2022. "Two-Person Bargaining when the Disagreement Point is Private Information," Papers 2211.06830, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    3. M. Yenmez, 2015. "Incentive compatible market design with applications," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(3), pages 543-569, August.
    4. Bierbrauer, Felix & Ockenfels, Axel & Pollak, Andreas & Rückert, Désirée, 2017. "Robust mechanism design and social preferences," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 59-80.
    5. Yekini Shehu & Lulu Liu & Qiao-Li Dong & Jen-Chih Yao, 2022. "A Relaxed Forward-Backward-Forward Algorithm with Alternated Inertial Step: Weak and Linear Convergence," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 959-990, December.
    6. Johannes Hörner & Satoru Takahashi & Nicolas Vieille, 2015. "Truthful Equilibria in Dynamic Bayesian Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83(5), pages 1795-1848, September.
    7. Jin Xi & Haitian Xie, 2021. "Strength in Numbers: Robust Mechanisms for Public Goods with Many Agents," Papers 2101.02423, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    8. Neeman, Zvika & Pavlov, Gregory, 2008. "Renegotiation-Proof Mechanism Design," Foerder Institute for Economic Research Working Papers 275717, Tel-Aviv University > Foerder Institute for Economic Research.
    9. Yuval Salant & Ron Siegel, 2016. "Reallocation Costs and Efficiency," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(1), pages 203-227, February.
    10. Krähmer, Daniel, 2012. "Auction design with endogenously correlated buyer types," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 118-141.
    11. Freni, Giuseppe & Gozzi, Fausto & Pignotti, Cristina, 2008. "Optimal strategies in linear multisector models: Value function and optimality conditions," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 55-86, January.
    12. Martin F. Hellwig, 2021. "Public-Good Provision with Macro Uncertainty about Preferences: Efficiency, Budget Balance, and Robustness," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2021_19, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    13. Rokhforoz, Pegah & Gjorgiev, Blazhe & Sansavini, Giovanni & Fink, Olga, 2021. "Multi-agent maintenance scheduling based on the coordination between central operator and decentralized producers in an electricity market," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    14. Guo, Huiyi, 2024. "Collusion-proof mechanisms for full surplus extraction," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 263-284.
    15. Kuzmics, Christoph & Steg, Jan-Henrik, 2017. "On public good provision mechanisms with dominant strategies and balanced budget," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 56-69.
    16. Neeman, Zvika & Pavlov, Gregory, 2013. "Ex post renegotiation-proof mechanism design," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(2), pages 473-501.
    17. Liu, Heng, 2018. "Efficient dynamic mechanisms in environments with interdependent valuations: the role of contingent transfers," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(2), May.
    18. , & ,, 2015. "Implementation with interdependent valuations," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(3), September.
    19. Mylovanov, Timofiy & Troger, Thomas E., 2012. "Informed principal problems in generalized private values environments," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 7(3), September.
    20. Bing Tan & Xiaolong Qin & Jen-Chih Yao, 2022. "Strong convergence of inertial projection and contraction methods for pseudomonotone variational inequalities with applications to optimal control problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 82(3), pages 523-557, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2302.05677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.