IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2209.01138.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Time Evolution of a Supply Chain Network: Kinetic Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Biswajit Debnath
  • Rihab El-Hassani
  • Amit K Chattopadhyay
  • T Krishna Kumar
  • Sadhan K Ghosh
  • Rahul Baidya

Abstract

Resilient supply chains are often inherently dependent on the nature of their complex interconnected networks that are simultaneously multi-dimensional and multi-layered. This article presents a Supply Chain Network (SCN) model that can be used to regulate downstream relationships towards a sustainable SME using a 4-component cost function structure - Environmental (E), Demand (D), Economic (E), and Social (S). As a major generalization to the existing practice of using phenomenological interrelationships between the EDES cost kernels, we propose a complementary time varying model of a cost function, based on Lagrangian mechanics (incorporating SCN constraints through Lagrange multipliers), to analyze the time evolution of the SCN variables to interpret the competition between economic inertia and market potential. Multicriteria decision making, based on an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), ranks performance quality, identifying key business decision makers. The model is first solved numerically and then validated against real data pertaining to two Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) from diverse domains, establishing the domain-independent nature of the model. The results quantify how increases in a production line without appropriate consideration of market volatility can lead to bankruptcy, and how high transportation cost together with increased production may lead to a break-even state. The model also predicts the time it takes a policy change to reinvigorate sales, thereby forecasting best practice operational procedure that ensures holistic sustainability on all four sustainability fronts.

Suggested Citation

  • Biswajit Debnath & Rihab El-Hassani & Amit K Chattopadhyay & T Krishna Kumar & Sadhan K Ghosh & Rahul Baidya, 2022. "Time Evolution of a Supply Chain Network: Kinetic Modeling," Papers 2209.01138, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2209.01138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.01138
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mar Fuentes-Fuentes, M. & Albacete-Sáez, Carlos A. & Lloréns-Montes, F. Javier, 2004. "The impact of environmental characteristics on TQM principles and organizational performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 425-442, December.
    2. Carter, Craig R. & Jennings, Marianne M., 2002. "Social responsibility and supply chain relationships," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 37-52, January.
    3. Woonghee Tim Huh & Kun Soo Park, 2013. "Impact of transfer pricing methods for tax purposes on supply chain performance under demand uncertainty," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(4), pages 269-293, June.
    4. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    5. Santoso, Tjendera & Ahmed, Shabbir & Goetschalckx, Marc & Shapiro, Alexander, 2005. "A stochastic programming approach for supply chain network design under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(1), pages 96-115, November.
    6. Haddadsisakht, Ali & Ryan, Sarah M., 2018. "Closed-loop supply chain network design with multiple transportation modes under stochastic demand and uncertain carbon tax," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 118-131.
    7. Rahman, Shams & Subramanian, Nachiappan, 2012. "Factors for implementing end-of-life computer recycling operations in reverse supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 239-248.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Biswajit Debnath & Amit K. Chattopadhyay & T. Krishna Kumar, 2024. "An Economic Optimization Model of an E-Waste Supply Chain Network: Machine Learned Kinetic Modelling for Sustainable Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-25, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan Xu & Chung-Hsing Yeh, 2017. "Sustainability-based selection decisions for e-waste recycling operations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 531-552, January.
    2. Chen, Lujie & Zhao, Xiande & Tang, Ou & Price, Lydia & Zhang, Shanshan & Zhu, Wenwen, 2017. "Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: A literature review and future research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 73-87.
    3. Vivek Agrawal & Rajendra P. Mohanty & Sucheta Agarwal & Jitendra Kumar Dixit & Anand M. Agrawal, 2023. "Analyzing critical success factors for sustainable green supply chain management," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8233-8258, August.
    4. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Güleryüz, Sezin, 2016. "An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 435-448.
    5. Mingqiang Yin & Min Huang & Xiaohu Qian & Dazhi Wang & Xingwei Wang & Loo Hay Lee, 2023. "Fourth-party logistics network design with service time constraint under stochastic demand," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1203-1227, March.
    6. T. Prabhuram & M. Rajmohan & Youchao Tan & R. Robert Johnson, 2020. "Performance evaluation of Omni channel distribution network configurations using multi criteria decision making techniques," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(1), pages 435-456, May.
    7. Alzaman, Chaher & Zhang, Zhi-Hai & Diabat, Ali, 2018. "Supply chain network design with direct and indirect production costs: Hybrid gradient and local search based heuristics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 203-215.
    8. Riya Sureka & Satish Kumar & Deepraj Mukherjee & Christina Theodoraki, 2023. "What restricts SMEs from adopting sophisticated capital budgeting practices?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 265-290, January.
    9. Chandra Prakash & Mukesh Kumar Barua, 2016. "A Multi-criteria Decision-making Approach for Prioritizing Reverse Logistics Adoption Barriers under Fuzzy Environment: Case of Indian Electronics Industry," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(5), pages 1107-1124, October.
    10. Ouhimmou, Mustapha & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Bouchard, Mathieu & Bricha, Naji, 2019. "Design of robust distribution network under demand uncertainty: A case study in the pulp and paper," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 96-105.
    11. Farooque, Muhammad & Zhang, Abraham & Liu, Yanping & Hartley, Janet L., 2022. "Circular supply chain management: Performance outcomes and the role of eco-industrial parks in China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    12. Songtao Zhang & Chunyang Zhang & Siqi Zhang & Min Zhang, 2018. "Discrete Switched Model and Fuzzy Robust Control of Dynamic Supply Chain Network," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-11, January.
    13. Lin, Cheng-Chang & Wu, Yi-Chen, 2013. "Optimal pricing for build-to-order supply chain design under price-dependent stochastic demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 31-49.
    14. Banai, Reza, 2010. "Evaluation of land use-transportation systems with the Analytic Network Process," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(1), pages 85-112.
    15. Fatih Yiğit & Şakir Esnaf, 2021. "A new Fuzzy C-Means and AHP-based three-phased approach for multiple criteria ABC inventory classification," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 1517-1528, August.
    16. M. Jenabi & S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi & S. A. Torabi & Moeen Sammak Jalali, 2022. "An accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm for stochastic power system expansion planning using sample average approximation," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(4), pages 1304-1336, December.
    17. Rachele Corticelli & Margherita Pazzini & Cecilia Mazzoli & Claudio Lantieri & Annarita Ferrante & Valeria Vignali, 2022. "Urban Regeneration and Soft Mobility: The Case Study of the Rimini Canal Port in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    18. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    19. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    20. Ahumada, Omar & Rene Villalobos, J. & Nicholas Mason, A., 2012. "Tactical planning of the production and distribution of fresh agricultural products under uncertainty," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 17-26.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2209.01138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.